浙大机械陶凯等 | 创新引领发展：以色列生物3D打印一瞥

上下滑动以阅览

1. Feiner R, Dvir T (2017) Tissue–electronics interfaces: from implantable devices to engineered tissues. Nat Rev Mater 3(1):17076. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.76

2. Chen K, Ren JY, Chen CY et al (2020) Safety and effectiveness evaluation of flexible electronic materials for next generation wearable and implantable medical devices. Nano Today 35:100939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100939

3. Wang LL, Jiang K, Shen GZ (2021) Wearable, implantable, and interventional medical devices based on smart electronic skins. Adv Mater Technol 6(6):2100107. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202100107

4. Lee S, Wang H, Peh WYX et al (2019) Mechano-neuromodulation of autonomic pelvic nerve for underactive bladder: a triboelectric neurostimulator integrated with flexible neural clip interface. Nano Energy 60:449–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.082

5. Sultana A, Alam MM, Garain S et al (2015) An effective electrical throughput from PANI supplement ZnS nanorods and PDMS-based flexible piezoelectric nanogenerator for power up portable electronic devices: an alternative of MWCNT filler. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(34):19091–19097. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b04669

6. Elder B, Neupane R, Tokita E et al (2020) Nanomaterial patterning in 3D printing. Adv Mater 32(17):e1907142. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201907142

7. Yang E, Miao SD, Zhong J et al (2018) Bio-based polymers for 3D printing of bioscaffolds. Polym Rev 58(4):668–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2018.1484761

8. Li JH, Pumera M (2021) 3D printing of functional microrobots. Chem Soc Rev 50(4):2794–2838. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs01062f

9. Maity N, Mansour N, Chakraborty P et al (2021) A personalized multifunctional 3D printed shape memory-displaying, drug releasing tracheal stent. Adv Funct Mater 31(50):2108436. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202108436

10. Dey M, Ozbolat IT (2020) 3D bioprinting of cells, tissues and organs. Sci Rep 10(1):14023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70086-y

11. Tamay DG, Usal TD, Alagoz AS et al (2019) 3D and 4D printing of polymers for tissue engineering applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 7:164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00164

12. Sithole MN, Mndlovu H, du Toit LC et al (2023) Advances in stimuli-responsive hydrogels for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications: a review towards improving structural design for 3D printing. Curr Pharm Des 29(40):3187–3205. https://doi.org/10.2174/0113816128246888230920060802

13. Zhu YZ, Joralmon D, Shan WT et al (2021) 3D printing biomimetic materials and structures for biomedical applications. Bio-Des Manuf 4(2):405–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00117-0

14. Wangpraseurt D, You ST, Azam F et al (2020) Bionic 3D printed corals. Nat Commun 11(1):1748. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15486-4

15. Kong YL, Gupta MK, Johnson BN et al (2016) 3D printed bionic nanodevices. Nano Today 11(3):330–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2016.04.007

16. Mader M, Hambitzer L, Schlautmann P et al (2021) Melt-extrusion-based additive manufacturing of transparent fused silica glass. Adv Sci 8(23):e2103180. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202103180

17. Shahzad A, Lazoglu I (2021) Direct ink writing (DIW) of structural and functional ceramics: recent achievements and future challenges. Compos Part B Eng 225:109249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109249

18. Tricot F, Venet C, Beneventi D et al (2018) Fabrication of 3D conductive circuits: print quality evaluation of a direct ink writing process. RSC Adv 8(46):26036–26046. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra03380c

19. Friedrich L, Begley M (2018) In situ characterization of low-viscosity direct ink writing: stability, wetting, and rotational flows. J Colloid Interface Sci 529:599–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.05.110

20. Lawson S, Farsad A, Rezaei F et al (2021) Direct ink writing of metal oxide/H-ZSM-5 catalysts for n-hexane cracking: a new method of additive manufacturing with high metal oxide loading. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(1):781–794. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c20752

21. Tan JJY, Lee CP, Hashimoto M (2020) Preheating of gelatin improves its printability with transglutaminase in direct ink writing 3D printing. Int J Bioprint 6(4):296. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i4.296

22. Ebers LS, Laborie MP (2020) Direct ink writing of fully bio-based liquid crystalline lignin/hydroxypropyl cellulose aqueous inks: optimization of formulations and printing parameters. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3(10):6897–6907. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c00800

23. Gleuwitz FR, Sivasankarapillai G, Siqueira G et al (2020) Lignin in bio-based liquid crystalline network material with potential for direct ink writing. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3(9):6049–6058. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c00661

24. Wan X, Luo L, Liu YJ et al (2020) Direct ink writing based 4D printing of materials and their applications. Adv Sci 7(16):2001000. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202001000

25. Pinargote NWS, Smirnov A, Peretyagin N et al (2020) Direct ink writing technology (3D printing) of graphene-based ceramic nanocomposites: a review. Nanomaterials 10(7):1300. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10071300

26. Mondal D, Willett TL (2020) Mechanical properties of nanocomposite biomaterials improved by extrusion during direct ink writing. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 104:103653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103653

27. Masuda T, Nakayama M, Saito K et al (2020) Inkjet printing of liquid silicon. Macromol Rapid Commun 41(23):e2000362. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202000362

28. Cesarano J, Grieco S (1997) Robocasting: a new technique for the freeform fabrication of near-net-shape ceramics. Mater Technol 12(3–4):98–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.1997.11752736

29. Chen X, Zhao GB, Wu YL et al (2017) Cellular carbon microstructures developed by using stereolithography. Carbon 123:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.043

30. Kim YT, Ahmadianyazdi A, Folch A (2023) Addendum: a ‘print-pause-print’ protocol for 3D printing microfluidics using multimaterial stereolithography. Nat Protoc 18(4):1377. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00818-7

31. Choi C, Okayama Y, Morris PT et al (2022) Digital light processing of dynamic bottlebrush materials. Adv Funct Mater 32(25):2200883. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202200883

32. Chiappone A, Roppolo I, Scavino E et al (2023) Three-dimensional printing of triboelectric nanogenerators by digital light processing technique for mechanical energy harvesting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15(46):53974–53983. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c13323

33. Kordi O, Behravesh AH, Hasannia S et al (2023) Additive manufacture of PLLA scaffolds reinforced with graphene oxide nano-particles via digital light processing (DLP). J Biomater Appl 38(4):484–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/08853282231202734

34. Wang H, Xia Y, Zhang ZX et al (2023) 3D gradient printing based on digital light processing. J Mater Chem B 11(37):8883–8896. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3tb00763d

35. Cazin I, Rossegger E, Roppolo I et al (2023) Digital light processing 3D printing of dynamic magneto-responsive thiol-acrylate composites. RSC Adv 13(26):17536–17544. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra02504g

36. Feng ZX, Li JS, Zhou DS et al (2023) A novel photocurable pullulan-based bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Int J Bioprint 9(2):657. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.657

37. Pongwisuthiruchte A, Dubas ST, Aumnate C et al (2022) Mechanically tunable resins based on acrylate-based resin for digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing. Sci Rep 12(1):20025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24667-8

38. Gong JX, Qian Y, Lu KJ et al (2022) Digital light processing (DLP) in tissue engineering: from promise to reality, and perspectives. Biomed Mater 17(6):062004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ac96ba

39. Mo XW, Ouyang LL, Xiong Z et al (2022) Advances in digital light processing of hydrogels. Biomed Mater 17(4):042002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ac6b04

40. Wang M, Li W, Mille LS et al (2021) Digital light processing based bioprinting with composable gradients. Adv Mater 34(1):2107038. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202107038

41. Fang ZZ, Shi YP, Zhang YH et al (2021) Reconfigurable polymer networks for digital light processing 3D printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(13):15584–15590. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c23107

42. Krkobabic M, Medarevic D, Pesic N et al (2020) Digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing of atomoxetine hydrochloride tablets using photoreactive suspensions. Pharmaceutics 12(9):833. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12090833

43. Kim SH, Kim DY, Lim TH et al (2020) Silk fibroin bioinks for digital light processing (DLP) 3D bioprinting. In: Chun HJ, Reis RL, Motta A et al (Eds.), Bioinspired Biomaterials. Springer, Singapore, p. 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3258-0_4

44. Chapter Traugutt NA, Mistry D, Luo CQ et al (2020) Liquid-crystal-elastomer-based dissipative structures by digital light processing 3D printing. Adv Mater 32(28):e2000797. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202000797

45. Hong H, Seo YB, Kim DY et al (2020) Digital light processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 232:119679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119679

46. Kuang X, Wu JT, Chen KJ et al (2019) Grayscale digital light processing 3D printing for highly functionally graded materials. Sci Adv 5(5):eaav5790. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav5790

47. Zhao TT, Yu R, Li S et al (2019) Superstretchable and processable silicone elastomers by digital light processing 3D printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(15):14391–14398. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b03156

48. Huang BX, Hu R, Xue ZH et al (2020) Continuous liquid interface production of alginate/polyacrylamide hydrogels with supramolecular shape memory properties. Carbohydr Polym 231:115736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115736

49. Decante G, Costa JB, Silva-Correia J et al (2021) Engineering bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 13:032001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abec2c

50. Chang R, Zhao LY, Xing RR et al (2023) Functional chromopeptide nanoarchitectonics: molecular design, self-assembly and biological applications. Chem Soc Rev 52(8):2688–2712. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cs00675h

51. Zhang Y, Li Q, Wu HR et al (2023) Racemic amino acid assembly enables supramolecular β-sheet transition with property modulations. ACS Nano 17(3):2737–2744. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c11006

52. Kam D, Braner A, Abouzglo A et al (2021) 3D printing of cellulose nanocrystal-loaded hydrogels through rapid fixation by photopolymerization. Langmuir 37(21):6451–6458. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00553

53. Pujals S, Tao K, Terradellas A et al (2017) Studying structure and dynamics of self-assembled peptide nanostructures using fluorescence and super resolution microscopy. Chem Commun 53(53):7294–7297. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cc02176c

54. Jia Y, Yan XH, Li JB (2022) Schiff base mediated dipeptide assembly toward nanoarchitectonics. Angew Chem 61(43):e202207752. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202207752

55. Tao K, Levin A, Adler-Abramovich L et al (2016) Fmoc-modified amino acids and short peptides: simple bio-inspired building blocks for the fabrication of functional materials. Chem Soc Rev 45(14):3935–3953. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00889a

56. Wang J, Zou QL, Yan XH (2017) Peptide supramolecular self-assembly: structural precise regulation and functionalization. Acta Chim Sinica 75(10):933–942 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.6023/A17060272

57. Chen Y, Tao K, Ji W et al (2022) Histidine as a key modulator of molecular self-assembly: peptide-based supramolecular materials inspired by biological systems. Mater Today 60:106–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2022.08.011

58. Sun BB, Tao K, Jia Y et al (2019) Photoactive properties of supramolecular assembled short peptides. Chem Soc Rev 48(16):4387–4400. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cs00085b

59. Wang YX, Geng Q, Zhang Y et al (2023) Fmoc-diphenylalanine gelating nanoarchitectonics: a simplistic peptide self-assembly to meet complex applications. J Colloid Interface Sci 636:113–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.12.166

60. Yuan CQ, Ji W, Xing RR et al (2019) Hierarchically oriented organization in supramolecular peptide crystals. Nat Rev Chem 3(10):567–588. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-019-0129-8

61. Ge Q, Chen Z, Cheng JX et al (2021) 3D printing of highly stretchable hydrogel with diverse UV curable polymers. Sci Adv 7(2):eaba4261. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba4261

62. Hartgerink JD, Beniash E, Stupp SI (2002) Peptide-amphiphile nanofibers: a versatile scaffold for the preparation of self-assembling materials. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(8):5133–5138. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072699999

63. Kumar M, Ing NL, Narang V et al (2018) Amino-acid-encoded biocatalytic self-assembly enables the formation of transient conducting nanostructures. Nat Chem 10(7):696–703. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0047-2

64. Liu YM, Xing RR, Li JB et al (2023) Covalently triggered self-assembly of peptide-based nanodrugs for cancer theranostics. iScience 26(1):105789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105789

65. Wang AH, Yang Y, Yan XH et al (2016) Preparation of multicompartment silica-gelatin nanoparticles with self-decomposability as drug containers for cancer therapy in vitro. RSC Adv 6(74):70064–70071. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA10743E

66. Yan XH, Zhu PL, Li JB (2010) Self-assembly and application of diphenylalanine-based nanostructures. Chem Soc Rev 39(6):1877–1890. https://doi.org/10.1039/b915765b

67. Li H, Zhao YY, Jia Y et al (2020) pH-responsive dopamine-based nanoparticles assembled via Schiff base bonds for synergistic anticancer therapy. Chem Commun 56(87):13347–13350. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cc04656f

68. Liu K, Xing RR, Zou QL et al (2016) Simple peptide-tuned self-assembly of photosensitizers towards anticancer photodynamic therapy. Angew Chem 55(9):3036–3039. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201509810

69. Ding X, Zhao HM, Li YZ et al (2020) Synthetic peptide hydrogels as 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 160:78–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.10.005

70. Oliver-Cervello L, Martin-Gomez H, Gonzalez-Garcia C et al (2023) Protease-degradable hydrogels with multifunctional biomimetic peptides for bone tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 11:1192436. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1192436

71. Hao ZW, Chen RX, Chai C et al (2022) Antimicrobial peptides for bone tissue engineering: diversity, effects and applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10:1030162. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1030162

72. Brun P, Zamuner A, Cassari L et al (2021) Chitosan covalently functionalized with peptides mapped on vitronectin and BMP-2 for bone tissue engineering. Nanomaterials 11(11):2784. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112784

73. Hao ZW, Li JF (2021) Local administration of parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related peptides for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Eng 38(5):1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.7507/1001-5515.202104045

74. Singhatanadgit W, Sungkhaphan P, Theerathanagorn T et al (2019) Analysis of sequential dual immobilization of type I collagen and BMP-2 short peptides on hydrolyzed poly(buthylene succinate)/beta-tricalcium phosphate composites for bone tissue engineering. J Biomater Appl 34(3):351–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328219852820

75. Visser R, Rico-Llanos GA, Pulkkinen H et al (2016) Peptides for bone tissue engineering. J Contr Release 244(Pt A):122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.10.024

76. Brun P, Ghezzo F, Roso M et al (2011) Electrospun scaffolds of self-assembling peptides with poly(ethylene oxide) for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 7(6):2526–2532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.025

77. Wang T, Liu Q, Chang YT et al (2023) Designed peptide-grafted hydrogels for human pluripotent stem cell culture and differentiation. J Mater Chem B 11:1434–1444. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb02521c

78. He L, Lan SJ, Cheng QF et al (2023) Self-assembling peptide SCIBIOIII hydrogel for three-dimensional cell culture that promotes wound healing in diabetic mice. Gels 9(4):265. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9040265

79. Li JL, Xue Y, Wang AH et al (2022) Polyaniline functionalized peptide self-assembled conductive hydrogel for 3D cell culture. Gels 8(6):372. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8060372

80. Restu WK, Yamamoto S, Nishida Y et al (2020) Hydrogel formation by short D-peptide for cell-culture scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 111:110746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110746

81. Harper MM, Connolly ML, Goldie L et al (2018) Biogelx: cell culture on self-assembling peptide gels. In: Nilsson BL, Doran TM (Eds.), Peptide Self-assembly: Methods and Protocols. Springer, New York, p. 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7811-3_18

82. Chapter Bennink LL, Li Y, Kim B et al (2018) Visualizing collagen proteolysis by peptide hybridization: from 3D cell culture to in vivo imaging. Biomaterials 183:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.039

83. Dou XQ, Feng CL (2017) Amino acids and peptide-based supramolecular hydrogels for three-dimensional cell culture. Adv Mater 29(16):1604062. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604062

84. Worthington P, Pochan DJ, Langhans SA (2015) Peptide hydrogels—versatile matrices for 3D cell culture in cancer medicine. Front Oncol 5:92. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00092

85. Modepalli VN, Rodriguez AL, Li R et al (2014) In vitro response to functionalized self-assembled peptide scaffolds for three-dimensional cell culture. Biopolymers 102(2):197–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.22469

86. Reis LA, Chiu LLY, Liang Y et al (2012) A peptide-modified chitosan-collagen hydrogel for cardiac cell culture and delivery. Acta Biomater 8(3):1022–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.030

87. Ma K, Xing RR, Jiao TF et al (2016) Injectable self-assembled dipeptide-based nanocarriers for tumor delivery and effective in vivo photodynamic therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(45):30759–30767. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b10754

88. Kim JH, Park CK, Park JE et al (2021) 3D print material study to reproduce the function of pig heart tissue. Technol Health Care 29(1):27–34. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-218003

89. Maier J, Weiherer M, Huber M et al (2019) Imitating human soft tissue on basis of a dual-material 3D print using a support-filled metamaterial to provide bimanual haptic for a hand surgery training system. Quant Imaging Med Surg 9(1):30–42. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2018.09.17

90. Haffner M, Quinn A, Hsieh TY et al (2018) Optimization of 3D print material for the recreation of patient-specific temporal bone models. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 127(5):338–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489418764987

91. Weeks RD, Truby RL, Uzel SGM et al (2023) Embedded 3D printing of multimaterial polymer lattices via graph-based print path planning. Adv Mater 35(30):e2305232. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202305232

92. Guo T, Holzberg TR, Lim CG et al (2017) 3D printing PLGA: a quantitative examination of the effects of polymer composition and printing parameters on print resolution. Biofabrication 9(2):024101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa6370

93. Li HJ, Zheng H, Tan YJ et al (2021) Development of an ultrastretchable double-network hydrogel for flexible strain sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(11):12814–12823. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c19104

94. Xiang SL, Su YX, Yin H et al (2021) Visible-light-driven isotropic hydrogels as anisotropic underwater actuators. Nano Energy 85:105965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105965

95. Le XX, Lu W, Zhang JW et al (2019) Recent progress in biomimetic anisotropic hydrogel actuators. Adv Sci 6(5):1801584. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201801584

96. Zheng BH, Zhou HW, Wang Z et al (2023) Fishing net-inspired mutiscale ionic organohydrogels with outstanding mechanical robustness for flexible electronic devices. Adv Funct Mater 33(28):2213501. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202213501

97. Liang YL, Xu YB, Ye W et al (2018) Multi-stage hydrogel rockets with stage dropping-off by thermal/light stimulation. J Mater Chem A 6(35):16838–16843. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA06715E

98. Liu H, Nguyen H, Lin C (2017) Dynamic PEG–oeptide hydrogels via visible light and FMN-induced tyrosine dimerization. Adv Healthc Mater 7(22):1800954. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201800954

99. Xue P, Bisoyi HK, Chen YH et al (2021) Near-infrared light-driven shape-morphing of programmable anisotropic hydrogels enabled by MXene nanosheets. Angew Chem 60(7):3390–3396. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202014533

100. Pu S, Su JX, Li LX et al (2018) Bioinspired sweating with temperature sensitive hydrogel to passively dissipate heat from high-end wearable electronics. Energy Convers Manag 180:747–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.027

101. .Zhou HW, Wang MC, Jin XL, et al (2021) Capacitive pressure sensors containing reliefs on solution-processable hydrogel electrodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(1):1441–1451. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c18355

102. Ma XZ, Yang ZQ, Wang YJ et al (2017) Remote controlling DNA hydrogel by magnetic field. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(3):1995–2000. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b12327

103. Caprioli M, Roppolo I, Chiappone A et al (2021) 3D-printed self-healing hydrogels via digital light processing. Nat Commun 12(1):2462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22802-z

104. Zhou Y, Layani M, Wang SC et al (2018) Fully printed flexible smart hybrid hydrogels. Adv Funct Mater 28(9):1705365. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201705365

105. Zhang B, Li SY, Hingorani H et al (2018) Highly stretchable hydrogels for UV curing based high-resolution multimaterial 3D printing. J Mater Chem B 6(20):3246–3253. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8tb00673c

106. Taherzadeh M, Baghani M, Baniassadi M et al (2016) Modeling and homogenization of shape memory polymer nanocomposites. Compos Part B Eng 91:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.12.044

107. Cooper CB, Nikzad S, Yan HP et al (2021) High energy density shape memory polymers using strain-induced supramolecular nanostructures. ACS Central Sci 7(10):1657–1667. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00829

108. Delaey J, Dubruel P, Van Vlierberghe S (2020) Shape-memory polymers for biomedical applications. Adv Funct Mater 30(44):1909047. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201909047

109. Mu T, Liu LW, Lan X et al (2018) Shape memory polymers for composites. Compos Sci Technol 160:169–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.018

110. Tao R, Ji LT, Li Y et al (2020) 4D printed origami metamaterials with tunable compression twist behavior and stress–strain curves. Compos B Eng 201:108344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108344

111. Zarek M, Layani M, Cooperstein I et al (2016) 3D printing of shape memory polymers for flexible electronic devices. Adv Mater 28(22):4449–4454. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503132

112. Keneth ES, Lieberman R, Rednor M et al (2020) Multi-material 3D printed shape memory polymer with tunable melting and glass transition temperature activated by heat or light. Polymers 12(3):710. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030710

113. Zhao YQ, Zhu JZ, He WY et al (2023) 3D printing of unsupported multi-scale and large-span ceramic via near-infrared assisted direct ink writing. Nat Commun 14:2381. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38082-8

114. Nguyen AK, Narayan RJ (2017) Two-photon polymerization for biological applications. Mater Today 20(6):314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.06.004

115. Cooperstein I, Indukuri SRKC, Bouketov A et al (2020) 3D printing of micrometer-sized transparent ceramics with on-demand optical-gain properties. Adv Mater 32(28):e2001675. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202001675

116. Dosovitskiy GA, Karpyuk PV, Evdokimov PV et al (2017) First 3D-printed complex inorganic polycrystalline scintillator. Cryst Eng Comm 19(30):4260–4264. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CE00541E

117. Wang S, Feng Y, Zhang H et al (2021) Highly stable and printable Ag NWs/GO/PVP composite ink for flexible electronics. Flex Print Electron 6(2):024002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-8585/abf847

118. Jayathilaka WADM, Chinnappan A, Ramakrishna S (2017) A review of properties influencing the conductivity of CNT/Cu composites and their applications in wearable/flexible electronics. J Mater Chem C 5(36):9209–9237. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tc02965a

119. Altay BN, Turkani VS, Pekarovicova A et al (2021) One-step photonic curing of screen-printed conductive Ni flake electrodes for use in flexible electronics. Sci Rep 11(1):3393. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82961-3

120. Wallin TJ, Pikul J, Shepherd RF (2018) 3D printing of soft robotic systems. Nat Rev Mater 3(6):84–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0002-2

121. Jiang JK, Bao B, Li MZ et al (2015) Fabrication of transparent multilayer circuits by inkjet printing. Adv Mater 28(7):1523. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201670047

122. Zub K, Hoeppener S, Schubert US (2022) Inkjet printing and 3D printing strategies for biosensing, analytical, and diagnostic applications. Adv Mater 34(31):e2105015. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202105015

123. Layani M, Cooperstein I, Magdassi S (2013) UV crosslinkable emulsions with silver nanoparticles for inkjet printing of conductive 3D structures. J Mater Chem C 1(19):3244–3249. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tc30253a

124. Agarwala S, Lee JM, Ng WL et al (2018) A novel 3D bioprinted flexible and biocompatible hydrogel bioelectronic platform. Biosens Bioelectron 102:365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.11.039

125. Shin SR, Zihlmann C, Akbari M et al (2016) Reduced graphene oxide-gelma hybrid hydrogels as scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Small 12(27):3677–3689. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201600178

126. Magdassi S, Grouchko M, Berezin O et al (2010) Triggering the sintering of silver nanoparticles at room temperature. ACS Nano 4(4):1943–1948. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn901868t

127. Zhou XR, Parida K, Halevi O et al (2020) All 3D-printed stretchable piezoelectric nanogenerator with non-protruding kirigami structure. Nano Energy 72:104676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104676

128. Whitesides GM (2018) Soft robotics. Angew Chem 57(16):4258–4273. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201800907

129. Patel DK, Sakhaei AH, Layani M et al (2017) Highly stretchable and UV curable elastomers for digital light processing based 3D printing. Adv Mater 29(15):1606000. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201606000

130. Baman JR, Ahmad FS (2020) Heart failure. JAMA 324(10):1015. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.13310

131. Radisic M (2015) Biomaterials for cardiac tissue engineering. Biomed Mater 10(3):030301. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/10/3/030301

132. Kitsuka T, Takahashi F, Reinhardt J et al (2022) Advances in cardiac tissue engineering. Bioengineering 9(11):696. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9110696

133. Zhao PC, Wang BL, Wang L et al (2023) Rapid printing of 3D porous scaffolds for breast reconstruction. Bio-Des Manuf 6(6):691–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-023-00253-3

134. Zhang Y, Kumar P, Lv SW et al (2020) Recent advances in 3D bioprinting of vascularized tissues. Mater Des 199:109398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109398

135. Noor N, Shapira A, Edri R et al (2019) 3D printing of personalized thick and perfusable cardiac patches and hearts. Adv Sci 6(11):1900344. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900344

136. Asulin M, Michael I, Shapira A et al (2021) One-step 3D printing of heart patches with built-in electronics for performance regulation. Adv Sci 8(9):2004205. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202004205

137. Silberman E, Oved H, Namestnikov M et al (2023) Post-maturation reinforcement of 3D-printed vascularized cardiac tissues. Adv Mater 35(31):e2302229. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202302229

138. Motoki K, Park J, Spence C et al (2022) Contextual acceptance of novel and unfamiliar foods: insects, cultured meat, plant-based meat alternatives, and 3D printed foods. Food Qual Prefer 96:104368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104368

139. Israeli D, Goldfriend YP, Dikovsky D et al (2023) Novel plant proteins used in 3D printed meat analogues: relationship between protein physicochemical and functional characteristics. Eur Food Res Technol 249:2335–2347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-023-04297-8

140. Redefinemeat precisely the same, entirely different. Redefinemeat. https://www.redefinemeat.com/technology. Accessed 20 Nov 2023

141. Steakholderfoods eat meat. Be a steakholder. Steakholderfoods. https://steakholderfoods.com/#scroll_page. Accessed 20 Nov 2023

142. Askew K (2020) Redefine meat targets ‘meat-lovers’ with 3D printed plant-based solutions: ‘we’re closer than you think’. https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2020/06/04/Redefine-Meat-targets-meat-lovers-with-3D-printed-plant-based-solutions-We-re-closer-than-you-think. Accessed 20 Nov 2023

143. Wang L, Lyu H, Zhang XY et al (2022) Revealing the aggregation behaviors of mesostructured collagen by the evaluation of reconstituted collagen performance. Food Hydrocoll 130:107700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107700

144. CollPlant a new era in regenerative medicine. CollPlant. https://collplant.com/. Accessed 19 Dec 2023

145. Shoseyov O, Posen Y, Grynspan F (2013) Human recombinant type I collagen produced in plants. Tissue Eng Pt A 19(13–14):1527–1533. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0347

146. Seror J, Stern M, Zarka R et al (2021) The potential use of novel plant-derived recombinant human collagen in aesthetic medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 148(6S):32s–38s. https://doi.org/10.1097/Prs.0000000000008784

147. Shilo S, Roth S, Amzel T et al (2013) Cutaneous wound healing after treatment with plant-derived human recombinant collagen flowable gel. Tissue Eng Pt A 19(13–14):1519–1526. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0345

148. Mediavilla D (2022) Meat without slaughter? Three eco-friendly alternatives are on the table. EL PAÍS. https://english.elpais.com/usa/2022-02-01/meat-without-slaughter-three-eco-friendly-alternatives-are-on-the-table.html. Accessed 20 Nov 2023

149. Lavon N (2022) New technologies for cultivated meat production. Trends Biotechnol 40(5):632–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.02.001

150. Ianovici I, Zagury Y, Redenski I et al (2022) 3D-printable plant protein-enriched scaffolds for cultivated meat development. Biomaterials 284:121487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121487

151. Pasitka L, Cohen M, Ehrlich A et al (2023) Spontaneous immortalization of chicken fibroblasts generates stable, high-yield cell lines for serum-free production of cultured meat. Nat Food 4:35–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00658-w

152. Toker A, Carmel IJ (2023) Autologous 3D neural implants for spinal cord injury. Tissue Eng Pt A 25(6):S141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1465-3249(23)00397-3

153. MASSIVIT. https://www.massivit3d.com/about-us/. Accessed 30 Dec 2023

154. Levi H (2018) Additive manufacturing in technical ceramics. Interceram Int Ceram Rev 67:12–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42411-018-0009-0

155. Li M, Yang Y, Nulman J et al (2022) Unique multi-level metal layer electronics solutions offered by advanced 3D printing. In: Proceeding of the 6th IEEE Electron Devices Technology & Manufacturing Conference, p. 144–144. https://doi.org/10.1109/edtm53872.2022.9798133

156. Sokol D, Yamada M, Nulman J (2021) Design and performance of additively manufactured in-circuit board planar capacitors. IEEE Trans Electron Dev 68(11):5747–5752. https://doi.org/10.1109/ted.2021.3117934

157. Macy B (2011) Rapid/affordable composite tooling strategies utilizing fused deposition modeling. SAMPE J 47(4):37–44

158. Schniepp TJ (2016) Design guide development for additive manufacturing (FDM) of composite tooling. SAMPE J 52(6):22–28

159. Türk D, Kussmaul R, Zogg M (2017) Composites part production with additive manufacturing technologies. Proc CIRP 66:306–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.359

160. Afshar A, Mihut D (2020) Enhancing durability of 3D printed polymer structures by metallization. J Mater Sci Tech 53(15):185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.072

161. Zhou SX, Mei H, Chang P et al (2020) Molecule editable 3D printed polymer-derived ceramics. Coordin Chem Rev 422:213486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213486

162. Maravola M, Conner B, Walker J et al (2019) Epoxy infiltrated 3D printed ceramics for composite tooling applications. Addit Manuf 25:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.036

163. Tao K, Xue B, Li Q et al (2019) Stable and optoelectronic dipeptide assemblies for power harvesting. Mater Today 30:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2019.04.002

164. Ji W, Yuan CQ, Chakraborty P et al (2020) Coassembly-induced transformation of dipeptide amyloid-like structures into stimuli-responsive supramolecular materials. ACS Nano 14(6):7181–7190. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c02138

165. Chen Y, Tao K, Ji W et al (2020) Self-assembly of cyclic dipeptides: platforms for functional materials. Protein Pept Lett 27(8):688–697. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929866527666200212123542

166. Reches M, Gazit E (2003) Casting metal nanowires within discrete self-assembled peptide nanotubes. Science 300(5619):625–627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082387

167. Ji W, Tang YM, Makam P et al (2021) Expanding the structural diversity and functional scope of diphenylalanine-based peptide architectures by hierarchical coassembly. J Am Chem Soc 143(42):17633–17645. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c07915

168. Chakraborty P, Tang YM, Yamamoto T et al (2020) Unusual two-step assembly of a minimalistic dipeptide-based functional hypergelator. Adv Mater 32(9):e1906043. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201906043

169. Tikhonova TN, Cohen-Gerassi D, Arnon ZA et al (2022) Tunable self-assembled peptide hydrogel sensor for pharma cold supply chain. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14(50):55392–55401. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c17609

170. Guerin S, Stapleton A, Chovan D et al (2017) Control of piezoelectricity in amino acids by supramolecular packing. Nat Mater 17(2):180–186. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat5045

171. Ji W, Xue B, Arnon ZA et al (2019) Rigid tightly packed amino acid crystals as functional supramolecular materials. ACS Nano 13(12):14477–14485. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b08217

172. Makam P, Yamijala SSRKC, Tao K et al (2019) Non-proteinaceous hydrolase comprised of a phenylalanine metallo-supramolecular amyloid-like structure. Nat Catal 2(11):977–985. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0348-x

173. Makam P, Yamijala SSRKC, Bhadram VS et al (2022) Single amino acid bionanozyme for environmental remediation. Nat Commun 13(1):1505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28942-0

174. Cordero RJB, Casadevall A (2020) Melanin. Curr Biol 30(4):R142–R143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.042

175. Nicolai MPJ, Shawkey MD, Porchetta S et al (2020) Exposure to UV radiance predicts repeated evolution of concealed black skin in birds. Nat Commun 11(1):2414. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15894-6

176. Lampel A, McPhee SA, Park HA et al (2017) Polymeric peptide pigments with sequence-encoded properties. Science 356(6342):1064–1068. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal5005

177. Reddy SMM, Rasslenberg E, Sloan-Dennison S et al (2020) Proton-conductive melanin-like fibers through enzymatic oxidation of a self-assembling peptide. Adv Mater 32(46):e2003511. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202003511

178. Lampel A, McPhee SA, Kassem S et al (2021) Melanin-inspired chromophoric microparticles composed of polymeric peptide pigments. Angew Chem 60(14):7564–7569. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202015170

179. Jones JC, Turpin EA, Bultmann H et al (2006) Inhibition of influenza virus infection by a novel antiviral peptide that targets viral attachment to cells. J Virol 80(24):11960–11967. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01678-06

180. Nir S, Zanuy D, Zada T et al (2019) Tailoring the self-assembly of a tripeptide for the formation of antimicrobial surfaces. Nanoscale 11(18):8752–8759. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nr10043h

181. Hu T, Agazani O, Nir S et al (2021) Antiviral activity of peptide-based assemblies. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(41):48469–48477. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c16003

182. Sun L, Dick A, Meuser ME et al (2020) Design, synthesis, and mechanism study of benzenesulfonamide-containing phenylalanine derivatives as novel HIV-1 capsid inhibitors with improved antiviral activities. J Med Chem 63(9):4790–4810. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00015

183. Baltina LA, Fairushina AI, Baltina LA et al (2017) Synthesis and antiviral activity of glycyrrhizic-acid conjugates with aromatic amino acids. Chem Nat Compd 53(6):1096–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-017-2209-7

184. Adler-Abramovich L, Gazit E (2008) Controlled patterning of peptide nanotubes and nanospheres using inkjet printing technology. J Pept Sci 14(2):217–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.963

185. Mohanraj G, Mao CW, Armine A et al (2018) Ink-jet printing-assisted modification on polyethersulfone membranes using a UV-reactive antimicrobial peptide for fouling-resistant surfaces. ACS Omega 3(8):8752–8759. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00916

186. Yang J, Chen MJ, Lee H et al (2021) Three-dimensional printing of self-assembled dipeptides. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(17):20573–20580. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c03062