《公共行政》微信公众号开始向之前在《公共行政》上发表过文章的作者征集之前发表的文章简介，如果您有兴趣在本公众号上推广您的文章，您可以将您文章的简介发送至邮箱：larsonse@miamioh.edu。唯一的要求是需要作者本人提供文章简介。
我们期待您的投稿！
今天为大家带来的是Eva M. Heims的研究：《欧盟机构中各国监管机构之间的协调：正式和非正式社会组织的作用》。
欧盟机构中各国监管机构之间的协调基于多种机制——如相互交流和等级制度——现有文献对此已有大量记录。然而，现有文献较少关注对这种差异的解释。本文提出，文化理论可以将各种协调机制的观察系统地整合到一个框架中。更重要的是，文化理论还指出了正式和非正式社会组织的重要性，从而为协调机制的差异提供了连贯的理论解释：国家监管机构的网格和团体边界，即欧盟机构和其专业社区的共享规范对它们施加的限制，可以解释政策部门出现不同类型的协调。文章通过介绍对三个案例的原创实证研究证明了这一点，这三个案例分别是欧盟机构中负责食品和海事安全以及银行监管的国家监管机构之间的协调。
Coordination between national regulators in EU agencies is based on a variety of mechanisms - such as mutual exchange and hierarchy - which the existing literature has extensively documented. However, it has paid less attention to explaining such variation. This article suggests that cultural theory can systematically integrate the observation of varied coordination mechanisms into one framework. More crucially, cultural theory also provides a coherent theoretical explanation for variation of coordination mechanisms by pointing to the importance of formal and informal social organization: the grid and group boundedness of national regulators, namely the constraints exercised on them by EU bodies and by the shared norms of their professional communities, can account for the emergence of different types of coordination across policy sectors. The article demonstrates this by presenting original empirical research on three cases, namely coordination between national regulators in the EU agencies responsible for food and maritime safety, as well as banking regulation.
![]()
Heims, E. M. (2015). Explaining coordination between national Regulators in EU agencies: the role of formal and informal social organization. Public Administration, 94(4), 881–896.
https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12223（或点击文末“阅读原文”查看）《公共行政》微信公众号刚刚上线不久，我们期待来自各界的宝贵意见，您可将您的建议发送给后台。如果您对我们推送的文章感兴趣，也可在下方留言评论，与其他读者一起交流。
翻译｜钟灵佳
编辑｜钟灵佳
审核｜Sarah E. Larson
欢迎扫描二维码关注我们！
