点击蓝字 ● 关注我们
New Program
《公共行政》微信公众号开始向之前在《公共行政》上发表过文章的作者征集之前发表的文章简介，如果您有兴趣在本公众号上推广您的文章，您可以将您文章的简介发送至邮箱：larsonse@miamioh.edu。唯一的要求是需要作者本人提供文章简介。
我们期待您的投稿！
今天为大家带来的是Tineke Abma的研究：《响应式评估：对公共行政的意义和特殊贡献》。
摘要
响应式评估为评估提供了一个新的视角和逻辑依据。在本文介绍的响应式评估样式中，评估从根据决策者提出的问题对政策干预措施进行评估，转变为以实现相互理解和接受的不同利益相关者之间的对话。鉴于目前存在的复杂性问题以及与互动和参与性政策方法的潜在协同作用，这种评估方法尤其适合公共行政领域。对公共政策问题的响应式评估和互动方法有着共同的民主目标，即参与和影响，这些概念之间的一致性使这两套思想和活动更加有效和有意义。本文以一个案例研究说明了响应式评估的价值和意义，以及这种评估方法与关于重要公共问题的公众对话概念之间的协同作用。该案例涉及对荷兰航空基础设施未来发展的有组织政策对话的响应式评估，该对话被广泛熟知为“史基浦讨论”。
Responsive evaluation offers an emerging vision and rationale for evaluation. In the version of responsive evaluation presented here, evaluation is reframed from the assessment of policy interventions on the basis of policy-makers’ questions to a dialogue among diverse stakeholder interests that moves towards reciprocal understanding and acceptance. This approach to evaluation is especially appropriate for the field of public administration, given the existing problems of complexity and the potential synergy with interactive and participatory policy approaches. Responsive evaluation and interactive approaches to public policy issues share the same democratic goals of participation and influence, and the alignment between these concepts make both sets of ideas and activities more effective and meaningful. The value and meaning of responsive evaluation and the synergy of this evaluation approach with the concept of public dialogue about important public issues is illustrated by a case study. This concerns a responsive evaluation of an organized policy dialogue about the future of the Dutch aviation infrastructure, known publicly as the Schiphol discussion.
文章来源：
Abma, T. (2004). Responsive Evaluation: the Meaning and Special Contribution to Public Administration. Public Administration, 82(4), 993–1012.
原文链接：
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00428.x（或点击文末“阅读原文”查看）
《公共行政》微信公众号刚刚上线不久，我们期待来自各界的宝贵意见，您可将您的建议发送给后台。如果您对我们推送的文章感兴趣，也可在下方留言评论，与其他读者一起交流。
