点击蓝字 ● 关注我们
New Program
《公共行政》微信公众号开始向之前在《公共行政》上发表过文章的作者征集之前发表的文章简介，如果您有兴趣在本公众号上推广您的文章，您可以将您文章的简介发送至邮箱：larsonse@miamioh.edu。唯一的要求是需要作者本人提供文章简介。
我们期待您的投稿！
今天为大家带来的是Vivien Schmidt, Matthew Wood的研究：《概念化通过量合法性：欧盟治理中的问责、透明、包容和开放的程序机制》。
摘要
本次专题讨论展示了通过量合法性（throughput legitimacy）这一概念在揭示多层级治理的优势和弱点方面的潜力，同时也在理论上对这一概念提出了挑战。本文通过将通过量合法性概念化为一个“伞式概念”来介绍本专题，认为这一概念涵盖了一系列不一定在实证上相互关联的规范性标准。文章认为，要全面探讨多层级治理过程的复杂性，我们需要制定一套不对多层级治理中权力行使的实证现实或其与合法性相互作用方式抱有天真态度的规范性标准。我们主张，尽管通过量合法性在规范性上存在一定局限性，但在这些目的上它仍具有实质性作用。尽管不能替代输入和输出合法性，通过量合法性提供了独特的规范性标准——问责制、透明度、包容性和开放性——并指出了实质性的制度改革方向。
This symposium demonstrates the potential for throughput legitimacy as a concept for shedding empirical light on the strengths and weaknesses of multi-level governance, as well as challenging the concept theoretically. This article introduces the symposium by conceptualizing throughput legitimacy as an ‘umbrella concept’, encompassing a constellation of normative criteria not necessarily empirically interrelated. It argues that in order to interrogate multi-level governance processes in all their complexity, it makes sense for us to develop normative standards that are not naïve about the empirical realities of how power is exercised within multi-level governance, or how it may interact with legitimacy. We argue that while throughput legitimacy has its normative limits, it can be substantively useful for these purposes. While being no replacement for input and output legitimacy, throughput legitimacy offers distinctive normative criteria—accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness—and points towards substantive institutional reforms.
文章来源：
Schmidt V, Wood M. Conceptualizing throughput legitimacy: Procedural mechanisms of accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness in EU governance. Public Admin. 2019; 97: 727–740.
原文链接：
https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12615（或点击文末“阅读原文”查看）
《公共行政》微信公众号刚刚上线不久，我们期待来自各界的宝贵意见，您可将您的建议发送给后台。如果您对我们推送的文章感兴趣，也可在下方留言评论，与其他读者一起交流。
