点击蓝字 ● 关注我们
New Program
《公共行政》微信公众号开始向之前在《公共行政》上发表过文章的作者征集之前发表的文章简介，如果您有兴趣在本公众号上推广您的文章，您可以将您文章的简介发送至邮箱：larsonse@miamioh.edu。唯一的要求是需要作者本人提供文章简介。
我们期待您的投稿！
今天为大家带来的是Aaron Deslatte, Elizabeth A. Koebele, Adam Wiechman的研究：《拥抱模糊性：追踪城市水管理中气候响应的多样性》。
摘要
气候变化是一项管理和治理挑战，需要采取多种潜在应对措施。本文强调了公共管理者在应对这种治理系统的多样性时所起的关键作用。响应多样性是指应对意外服务中断时可用的基于规则的选项集，它不同于模糊性，后者在公共管理中具有负面含义。我们首先从公共管理、弹性和认知科学研究中提出理论假设，探讨制度如何影响响应多样性。然后，我们使用制度语法和制度网络分析工具，实证追踪了美国两个城市水务公司的费率制定过程。我们得出结论，制度设计确实显著影响响应多样性，因此是评估高度工程化基础设施系统气候适应性的关键。具体而言，我们发现了在选择投资策略时使用的信息、参与和启发法多样性方面的重要差异。
Climate change is a management and governance challenge requiring diverse potential responses. This article highlights the critical role public managers play in navigating the response diversity of such governance systems. Response diversity is the rule-based set of options available for responding to unexpected service disruptions and is distinguished from ambiguity, which holds a negative valence within public administration. We first develop theoretical propositions about how institutions influence response diversity, drawing on public administration, resilience, and cognitive science research. Then, we use the Institutional Grammar and Institutional Network Analysis tools to empirically trace the rate-making processes in two U.S. urban water utilities. We conclude that institutional designs do distinctively influence response diversity and are therefore key for evaluating the climate adaptability of heavily engineered infrastructure systems. Specifically, we identify important differences in the diversity of information, participation, and heuristics used for selecting investment strategies.
文章来源：
Deslatte, A., Koebele, E. A., & Wiechman, A. (2024). Embracing the ambiguity: Tracing climate response diversity in urban water management. Public Administration, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13017
原文链接：
https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13017（或点击文末“阅读原文”查看）
《公共行政》微信公众号刚刚上线不久，我们期待来自各界的宝贵意见，您可将您的建议发送给后台。如果您对我们推送的文章感兴趣，也可在下方留言评论，与其他读者一起交流。
