八大国际油气巨头气候行动表现如何?

文摘   2024-06-01 02:02   北京  

星标「宜减煤」🌟,锁定精彩好文

国际石油变革组织(Oil Change International)5月发布题为《石油巨头真相核查》(Big Oil Reality Check)的报告。该报告从雄心、诚信和以人为本的转型三大维度出发,对总部位于欧美的八大国际石油和天然气生产商的气候和可持续相关倡议与计划进行了评估。通过对英国石油(BP)、雪佛龙(Chevron)、康菲石油(ConocoPhillips)、埃尼石油(Eni)、艾诺(Equinor)、埃克森美孚(ExxonMobil)、壳牌石油(Shell)和道达尔能源(TotalEnergies)等公司的深入案例分析,报告揭示了一个令人遗憾的现实:


按照从“极度不足”到“完全符合”的五级评价体系,八家公司的气候计划几乎在所有标准上都被评为“严重不足”或“不足”。


而报告所设定的十条标准,仅为与《巴黎协定》1.5℃温控目标相适应的最低要求。


报告认为,鉴于对气候危机负有重要历史责任的油气公司难以信任,想要脱离化石燃料,实现公正、快速、全面且有资金支持的转型,需要政府和投资者,尤其是全球北方国家实施更有力的政策和干预策略。


一边“洗绿”,一边继续获利

尽管COP28达成了转型脱离化石燃料的倡议,且自《巴黎协定》以来,大型石油和天然气公司接连发布气候承诺和计划,但其内容缺乏雄心。这些公司还尤其擅长在财务报告上故弄玄虚、进行信息误导和“洗绿”。将石油、天然气和煤炭保留在地下的论据从未如此确凿和充分,但事实是,油气巨头们仍在抵制和阻碍向清洁和可再生能源的快速、公正转型。

图1 八家公司的评估结果一览,其气候计划在十项考察方面几乎均表现为不足甚至极度不足


气候雄心方面,在分析的8家公司中,有6家明确表示要增加石油和天然气产量。即使没有相关计划的公司也正在推进新的化石燃料项目并出售污染资产,而不是关停项目,将他们的行为伪装为对能源转型的贡献,同时持续造成气候污染。


而诚信也是很大的问题。报告分析的所有公司都没有设定全面目标,以确保它们的总排放量能从现在开始持续快速下降。这八家公司打算依靠碳捕集和储存(CCS)、碳抵消措施,和/或其他推迟终止化石燃料的进程,并转移重点,从而使得这些“肮脏能源”继续损害健康和群体安全。


此外,在以人为本的转型方面也表现不佳。所有公司都未能满足公正转型的基本标准,包括为其经营地区的员工和社区提供支持,就安全和环境清理等关键问题建立对话机制、进行资助和补偿等,这构成其气候行动不可信的另一个原因。


雷斯塔能源(Rystad Energy)的数据显示,总部位于欧美的这八大主要生产商计划到2030年将其总产量较2023年水平增加17%。从现在到2050年,这八家公司累积的油气产量有可能消耗为实现1.5度温控目标全球剩余碳预算的30%以上。


图2 为实现1.5度温控目标,当前碳预算仅210兆吨,而当前已开发油气和煤碳储量所造成的二氧化碳排放量就将达到936兆吨。


全球范围内油气生产的大幅增加将使全球变暖走向升温超过2°C的方向,进一步加剧对脆弱社区和生态系统的破坏,造成难以挽回的局面。相反,若这些公司停止钻探新的石油和天然气,它们的产量预计将在2030年前集体减少17%,更接近1.5°C温控路径的速度。


图3 八大油气公司产量预期与多种温控路径要求趋势的比较


还能做什么来补救?

全球需要一个公平、迅速、全面、有资金支持的转型,摆脱对化石燃料生产和使用的依赖,关闭部分现有油气田和矿山。那些对气候危机有巨大历史责任、从数十年石油、天然气和煤炭开采获得巨大利润得大型油气公司必须最先行动,提供资金支持他人。但不能指望它们逐步淘汰自己的产品或促进自身的衰退。这需要同时从需求和供给两方面进行干预,因此投资者和政府必须介入,法院也需追究这些公司的责任。特别是经济多样化程度高的富裕国家应当率先快速行动。


报告建议,急需加强以下方面的政策力度:


  • 停止颁发针对化石燃料开采或相关基础设施建设的新许可;

  • 明确符合1.5°C温控目标的终止油气生产期限,且符合全球国家间公平原则。发达国家生产者应最快最先行动;

  • 取消对化石燃料开采或基础设施的补贴以及国内外公共财政支持,包括延续行业污染的CCS等技术;

  • 制定税收政策,减少对新型化石燃料的投资,将公共资金最大化用于为公正转型和应对国内外气候影响承担应有的费用;

  • 建立政策框架,确保受影响的工人和社区能公正过渡。包括:使公司承担清理、恢复和退役化石燃料资产成本的责任、追究公司向受影响社区支付赔偿的责任;

  • 通过立法保护当地居民权利,确保存在法律途径供人们寻求禁令救济和/或赔偿。


滑动或点击“阅读原文”查看英文原文

Executive Summary


Since the Paris Agreement especially, big oil and gas companies have published a succession of climate pledges and plans. What they lack in ambition, they make up for in questionable accounting, misleading information, and greenwashing. The case for keeping oil, gas, and coal in the ground has never been stronger, but the reality is that big oil and gas companies continue to resist and block a fast and fair transition to clean, renewable energy.


Ambition: Of the 8 analyzed companies, 6 have explicit goals to increase oil and gas production. Even those without such plans are advancing new fossil fuel projects and selling polluting assets rather than shutting them down, masking their actions as contributing to an energy transition while perpetuating climate pollution.


Integrity: None of the companies we analyzed have set comprehensive targets to ensure their total emissions decline rapidly and consistently, starting now. Every company intends to rely on carbon capture and storage (CCS), offsets, and/or other methods that delay and distract from ending fossil fuels, and prolong the health and community safety impacts of dirty energy.


People-Centered Transitions: All companies fail to meet basic criteria for just transition plans for workers and communities where they operate. All companies fail to meet basic criteria on upholding human rights.


Rystad Energy data indicate that the eight largest U.S.- and Europeanbased producers are on track to increase their combined production by 17 percent above 2023 levels by 2030 (Figure 2). Such an increase in production on a global scale would put the world on a path towards global heating well beyond 2°C locking in destruction of vulnerable communities and ecosystems. Conversely, if these companies were to cease drilling for new oil and gas, their production would be expected to decline by 17 percent collectively by 2030 – a pace much closer to aligning with a 1.5°C pathway, though still not a fast-enough pace.


These eight companies’ cumulative oil and gas production between now and 2050 threatens to exhaust more than 30 percent of the entire world’s remaining carbon budget for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C.


CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The companies that have collectively done the most to fuel the climate crisis cannot be trusted to meaningfully confront it. Six of the eight big oil and gas companies analyzed expressly plan to grow oil and gas production this decade – and independent forecasts show that all eight combined are on track to produce more oil and gas in 2030 than now. Big oil and gas companies will not phase out their own products or manage their own decline. Investors and governments must intervene. Additionally, courts must hold these companies accountable.


The world needs a fair, fast, full, and funded transition away from fossil fuel production and use, with some existing fields and mines being closed early alongside meaningful just transition measures. This will require both demand- and supply-side interventions. It is crucial that these interventions are based on equity, and in particular that the wealthiest countries with diversified economies should act first and fastest. Those big oil and gas companies with huge historical responsibility for the climate crisis, and wealth derived from many decades of oil, gas, and coal extraction, must act first and fastest, and must be required to provide finance to support others.


Ending new licensing and permitting of fossil fuel extraction or infrastructure;


Setting a 1.5°C-aligned phaseout date for ending oil and gas production, consistent with principles of global equity between countries, with Global North producers moving first and fastest;


Eliminating subsidies and domestic and international public finance for fossil fuel extraction or infrastructure, including technologies like CCS that perpetuate the industry’s pollution;


Putting tax policies in place to disincentivize investment in new fossil fuels and maximize public funds, in order to pay their fair share for a just transition and climate impacts at home and abroad;


Establishing policy frameworks that guarantee a just transition for affected workers and communities. This includes: Holding companies accountable for cleanup, restoration, and decommissioning costs in phasing out fossil fuel assets; and Holding companies accountable for paying reparations to impacted communities;


Adopting legislation to protect human rights and Indigenous Peoples’ rights and to ensure that legal avenues exist for people to seek injunctive relief, compensation, or both.



文章内容主要摘选自Oil Change International发布的Big Oil Reality Check报告,并增加了该机构5月21日发布的媒体公开稿中的部分内容。文章仅代表作者观点,不代表本公众号立场。

文章内容有删减,点击“左下角”获取原文链接

封面图源:unsplash

翻译/李斯吟   审校/杨鹂 汪燕辉    编辑/包林洁

END


报告精华 | 退煤趋势下,印度尼西亚和越南转型出路何在?

智利公正转型的战略与启示

七国集团确定2035年前停止使用煤电

哪些银行仍在大力支持煤炭行业?

宜减煤 Farewell Coal
关注能源转型,汇集国际资讯和学术研究,促进跨行业对话。
 最新文章