行政区划调整影响区域经济增长的双重效应——基于新一轮撤县设市政策的实证分析
文摘
财经
2024-09-30 14:39
上海
行政区划调整影响区域经济增长的双重效应——基于新一轮撤县设市政策的实证分析
The Dual Effects of Administrative Division Adjustment on Regional Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis Based on the New Round of County-to-City Upgrading Policy
《财经研究》2024年50卷第8期 页码:79-93 online:2024年8月3日
中:赵红军 , 侯蓉 , 张欣然
英:Zhao Hongjun, Hou Rong, Zhang Xinran
作者单位:上海师范大学 商学院,上海 200234
摘要:改革开放以来,行政区划调整一直是我国政府推动经济发展与社会治理的有效政策举措之一,但学界有关近年来新一轮撤县设市政策效应的研究尚未充分展开。为此,文章基于我国2011—2020年246个县市的面板数据,使用双重差分法考察了新一轮撤县设市对区域经济增长的影响。结果发现,此轮撤县设市政策的影响效应喜忧参半。一方面,新一轮撤县设市政策主要通过招商引资、促进劳动力就业、提高金融发展水平和改善公共服务等渠道给当地经济发展带来了红利;另一方面,如果原有产业基础薄弱,加之地方官员在现有晋升激励机制下只将撤县设市作为施政目标,往往注重短期内达到设市目标而忽视长期发展,注重设市后城市基础设施建设而“挤占”了当地其他工业和第三产业发展空间,那么区域经济产出在设市后呈现负向增长。从负向影响的异质性来看,那些发展水平越落后的地区,这种负向影响越明显;从时间动态效应来看,这种负向影响在短期内较为显著,随着时间延长而变得不显著。因此,经济相对落后的县级政府应理性看待撤县设市,要基于当地发展的产业基础等实际条件而客观评估撤县设市的必要性和科学性,在此基础上采取务实、持续的改革举措来释放相关的政策红利,避免因注重短期面子工程而导致负面影响显现。
关键词:撤县设市;行政区划调整;经济增长;双重差分法
Summary: Since the reform and opening up, administrative division adjustment has been an effective policy measure to promote economic development and social governance. However, the academic circles have not fully studied the effects of the new round of county-to-city upgrading policy in recent years. In view of this, it is of great significance to investigate the effects of the new round of county-to-city upgrading policy to promote the effective release of the policy dividend and give full play to its positive policy effects. Based on the county-level panel data of 246 counties and cities in China from 2011 to 2020, this paper empirically analyzes the effects and mechanisms of the new round of county-to-city upgrading policy on regional economic growth by constructing a DID method. The findings reveal that the policy effects are mixed. On the one hand, the policy generates dividends for local economic development through channels such as attracting investment, promoting employment, enhancing financial development, and improving public services. However, due to the weak industrial foundations and the incentive mechanism for local officials to prioritize achieving the city-level status in the short term at the expense of long-term development vision, there is a greater emphasis on the significant increase in urban infrastructure construction after the policy, resulting in negative growth of regional economic output. On the other hand, the less developed regions experience a more pronounced negative impact. Regarding the time dynamics, the negative impact is more significant in the short term and becomes less significant over time. This paper makes several potential contributions: First, it provides the latest empirical analysis of the effects of the new round of county-to-city upgrading policy, filling the gap in existing literature that mostly focuses on descriptive interpretations of the policy at the theoretical level. Second, it reveals that the policy has a short-term negative impact on local economic growth, but this effect diminishes over time. It differs significantly from the previous research, which suggests that the effect of the previous round of policy is insignificant in the short term or can promote local economic growth in the long term. Third, the current policy guidance for regional macroeconomics aims to promote the quality and efficiency of new urbanization, emphasize the coordinated development of cities, prevent a focus on short-term political performance goals while neglecting long-term performance tracking, and promote the high-quality development of the national economy. Under this background, this paper hopes to provide corresponding policy references for relatively backward regions to consolidate the industrial foundation and reverse the distortion of incentives.
Key words: county-to-city upgrading policy; administrative division adjustment; economic growth; DID
DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20240223.201
收稿日期:2023-08-17
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重点项目(23AZD008);国家社会科学基金重大项目(22&ZD067);国家社会科学基金一般项目(18BJL003)