文献分享·第109期|通过EAPVVS-E对护理专业学生对HIV/AIDS感染者的态度的描述性分析

文摘   2024-11-08 12:00   新加坡  

文献分享 |Attitudes towards people living with HIV/AIDS through the EAPVVS-E: A descriptive analysis in nursing students

来源Nurse Education Today 

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106418

IF:3.9



Abstract 摘要

BackgroundDespite advances in antiretroviral treatment, stigma towards people with HIV/AIDS continues to exist. Nursing students, as future key players in health care, must advocate for the elimination of stigma through education, empathy and the creation of a supportive environment. This holistic approach is crucial to improving their quality of life and moving towards the eradication of HIV/AIDS.

背景尽管抗逆转录病毒治疗取得了进展,但对艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者的污名仍然存在。护理专业的学生,作为未来卫生保健的关键参与者,必须通过教育、同情和创造支持性环境来倡导消除耻辱。这种整体办法对于提高他们的生活质量和走向消灭HIV/AIDS至关重要。


Aim:To identify nursing students' attitudes towards people living with HIV or AIDS and their relationship with sociodemographic and academic-cultural variables of the participants.

目的:了解护生对HIV/AIDS感染者的态度及其与社会人口学和学术文化变量的关系。


Design:A cross-sectional study was performed.

实验设计:进行横断面研究。


Settings:The research was carried out in the Nursing Degree of the Faculty of Health Sciences of the Ceuta Campus of the University of Granada.

环境:本研究在格拉纳达大学休达校区健康科学学院护理学位课程中进行。


Participants:Convenience sampling was used to recruit 284 students of the degree in Nursing.

研究对象:采用方便抽样法,共招募护理专业学生284名。


Methods:Data were collected voluntarily and on an anonymous basis, using the “Attitudes Towards People Living with HIV/AIDS Scale in Nursing Students”. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

方法:采用“护生对HIV/AIDS感染者态度量表”,采用自愿、匿名方式收集数据。进行了双变量和多变量分析。


Results:Factors 1 (Professional Practice), 2 (Social Integration) and 3 (Partner and Family) exhibited mean scores considered to be favourable attitudes (>4 points). In contrast, Factor 4, called Benevolent Stigma, had a mean score of 3.68 ± 0.97. Religious beliefs, academic year, sexual orientation, academic practices and age are considered influential variables in the different factors.

结果:因素1(专业实践)、2(社会融合)和3(伴侣和家庭)的平均得分被认为是有利的态度(>4分)。相比之下,因子4,称为仁慈的耻辱,平均得分为3.68±0.97。宗教信仰、学年、性取向、学术实践和年龄被认为是不同因素中的影响变量。


Conclusions:Nursing students present attitudes with favourable scores. However, these results highlight the importance of influencing the different factors, especially in the second year of the Bachelor's Degree in Nursing in our sample. Thus, an educational intervention in this area would be necessary to reinforce the values of humanised care.

结论:护生态度较好。然而,这些结果凸显了影响不同因素的重要性,尤其是在我们的样本中护理学士学位的第二年。因此,有必要在这方面进行教育干预,以强化人性化护理的价值。


Keywords: Attitude; Social discrimination; HIV/AIDS; Nursing students; Surveys and questionnaires

关键词:态度;社会歧视;艾滋病毒/艾滋病;护理学生;调查及问卷

(译文仅供参考)


END

关于我们


我们因护理相识

我们以热爱相聚

一起探索和成长

“医路漫长,我们双向奔赴”

护理小白编辑部
Share Together,Grow Together 一起分享,一起成长
 最新文章