Cerambyx argentatus Dalman, 1817: 151.
Chelidonium argentatum: Thomson, 1864: 176.
别名：桔光绿天牛
鉴别特征：体长20.0~30.0 mm。体墨绿色，有光泽；腹面绿色，被银灰色绒毛，足和触角深蓝色或黑紫色，跗节黑褐色；腹面有灰褐色绒毛。触角柄节上密布刻点，第5~10节端部有尖刺，雄虫触角略长于身体，前胸长宽约相等；侧刺突端部略钝；前胸背板具刻点和细密皱纹，两侧刻点细密而皱纹较少；前胸面前后缘、侧刺突和小盾片均平滑而有光泽。鞘翅上布满细密刻点和皱纹。腿节刻点细密；雄虫后腿节略超过鞘翅的末端，第1跗节长相当第2、第3节之和。雄虫腹部第5节后缘凹陷，雌虫腹部第5节后缘拱凸呈圆形。
文献记录：湖南湘南（华立中等，1992）；江西九连山（章士美等，1989；丁冬荪，2002）。
标本检视：广东1♀，乳源县南岭，詹程辉（CZCH）；1♂1♀，连州大东山，2011.Ⅴ.29-31（SYSU, En-348577，348585）。广西1♀，兴安县猫儿山十里大峡谷，2003.Ⅶ.13，刘星月（史宏亮个人收藏）；1♂，阳朔，1959.Ⅴ（SYSU, Ce-002841）。
分布：广东（乳源、连州）、广西（兴安、阳朔）、湖南（湘南）、江西（九连山）、陕西、河南、江苏、安徽、浙江、福建、海南，香港、澳门、四川、云南；越南，老挝，印度，缅甸，斯里兰卡。
寄主：柠檬、雪柑、桶桔、芦柑、红桔。
生活习性：在福建每年发生一代，只有少数二年完成一代者，成虫于5—6月出现，产卵在树枝末端的细枝间的交叉口或叶柄与枝的交叉口上，幼虫孵化后向树枝蛀入，蛀食方向系由上向下，至12月成熟，开始进入休眠越冬时期，翌年4月进入预蛹期，身体缩短，头部下垂，3~5日后蜕皮化蛹，5—6月羽化成虫（陈世骧 等，1959）。
Leontium sinense: Gahan, 1894a: 17.
Chelidonium sinense: Gahan, 1906: 212.
Polyzonus sinensis: Gressitt & Rondon, 1970: 156, 157.
Polyzonus (Polyzonus) sinense: Bentanachs, 2012a: 48, 95, figs. 121-126.
澳门记录
别名：中华绿天牛
鉴别特征：体长16.0~29.0 mm。体墨绿色，有光泽；腹面绿色，被银灰色绒毛，足和触角深蓝色或紫绿色，跗节黑褐色；额刻点细密，在唇基和额之间没有光滑区域；额区上有一中沟伸向头顶区；触角柄节上密布刻点，7~10节端部有齿，雄虫触角略长于身体，前胸长宽约相等；侧刺突端部略钝；前胸背板两侧、基部和中线均平滑而有光泽；中线两侧明显可见深色斑区。鞘翅上布满细密刻点和皱纹，末端钝圆。雄虫后腿节略超过鞘翅的末端，后足第1跗节长约等于其后各节之和。雄虫腹部腹面可见6节，第5节后缘凹陷，雌虫腹部腹面只见5节，第5节后缘明显凹切。
文献记录：Taam-yuen-tung, Lien District (Gressitt, 1939b)；广东连县（华立中 等，1993）；广西猫儿山（黄建华 等，2002）。
标本检视：广东1♂，Lin-hsian, Tam Yuen Tung, 1934.Ⅵ.4-6, F. K.To（SYSU, En-419084）。广西1♀，兴安漠川久中，588m，2019.Ⅵ.11，卢彦权（CCCC）；1♀，兴安漠川久中，588m，2019.Ⅵ.12，卢彦权（CCCC）；1♀，兴安漠川久中，588m，2019.Ⅵ.13，卢彦权（CCCC）。
分布：广东（连州）、广西（兴安）、湖南、江西、福建、海南、香港、澳门、重庆、四川、贵州、云南；越南，老挝，泰国，印度，缅甸。
越南标本图片参考
这图的鉴定者，有在研究绿天牛族
这号有疑问的澳门标本，保存在美国
近期从美国寄到了澳门大学
以下图片由澳门大学的李斯辰拍摄
澳门天牛里的判断：
Remarks.Easton (1993) reported this species as “Chelidonium sinense(Hope)”but it seems most likely that the main species involved in his observations was actually C. argentatum and not Polyzonus sinensis, given the laterally expanded metatibia and short tarsal segments exhibited by the typical specimen illustrated in his work (Easton 1993: 47).
综上，目前我能给的结论是：维持Easton (1993)的原判，是中华多带天牛Polyzonus sinensis (Hope, 1842)。我们文章里的结论，是根据文献图片得出的，误判为之前鉴定为绿天牛Chelidonium argentatum，我们错了。
更多讨论细节
Easton 1992年的报道
Easton 1993年的报道和图片
澳门报道里面错误的推论的相关讨论：
我的讨论：
Perissinotto, Renzo的回复：Now, regarding Polyzonus sinensis, we have reported it as occurring in Macau (Taipa Island) in our 2021 ZooKey census paper, with illustrations and recent records. So, in my view the issue of the identification of Easton's specimen is of relative minor importance. It is very clear from the photos you have sent that the specimen illustrated in there is indeed P. sinensis. Unfortunately, when I analysed the Easton Collection at the University of Macao, there were no specimens of either P. sinensis or Chelidonium argentatum in any of the cabinets I was given access to at the time. So, I don't really know where this specimen comes from - was it outside Macau and now it has been returned, or what else? What we looked at was the old and poor quality photo included in Easton 1993 (see attached PDF copy), and then considering that we had observed many specimens of C. argentatum but hardly any of P. sinensis during our 3-year survey, we became convinced that Easton may have actually confused the two species in his account. In his paper of 1992 (see attached PDF copy), he specifically mentions having observed/collected the species at least on two different occasions (28 May and 30 May). In summary, I don't think we need to do anything at this stage, as we reported that "it seems most likely that the main species involved in his observations was actually C. argentatum and not Polyzonus sinensis". The word "main", unequivocally does not exclude P. sinensis. Perhaps what can be done at the next opportunity, when this species is mentioned in a relevant context, is to write a little note specifying that a specimen of P. sinensis from the Easton's Collection has now been traced and confirms that this species was indeed correctly reported in his publications.
图片11月22日就发来了，我想着尽快回复的，但是做到一半，我被打断去处理其他事情了，然后我就把这件事情给忘记了。抱歉！
同时被忘记的，是答应11月19日回复的一个稿子，被我忘得一干二净，今天才匆忙处理。
怎么办呢？忘事的频率越来越高。
最不能战胜的，是时间这把无情之剑。
以前看见发生在前辈身上的事情，当年不能理解
如今一件件加在自己身上
恍然大悟的同时
对各种断崖式衰老现象无能无力
