导读
2024年10月14日,2024年诺贝尔经济学奖揭晓获奖结果,Daron Acemoglu,Simon Johnson和James A. Robinson获奖。他们的研究指出社会制度对一个国家繁荣的重要性,法治不佳的社会和剥削人口的制度不会带来经济增长与社会发展。诺贝尔奖委员会认为,在面临国家间巨大的收入差距下,获奖者的研究凸显了社会制度的关键作用。为使大家更好了解本届诺贝尔经济学奖获得者的学术成果,IMI大金融思想特别精选了三位教授代表性文章,以飨读者。其中,Daron Acemoglu教授部分精选的7篇论文与本届诺奖主题密切相关,Simon Johnson教授部分精选了关于产权制度与金融制度对经济行为主体的研究,James A. Robinson教授部分则精选了公共资源与政治激励之间相互关系的研究。
Daron Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu,现为美国麻省理工学院教授。1967 年出生于土耳其伊斯坦布尔,于1992 年毕业于英国伦敦政治经济学院,获得博士学位。研究方向与研究兴趣包括政治经济学、经济发展与经济增长、技术创新、收入与工资不平等、劳动经济学等。截至2024年9月,出版著作6部,内容涵盖经济增长理论、社会制度与发展等,研究论文发表于American Economic Review(18篇)、Quarterly Journal of Economics(15篇)、Journal of Political Economy(19篇)、Review of Economic Studies(16篇)、Econometrica(9篇)等国际一流经济学期刊。
内容与摘要
1
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation(发展差异的殖民地起源:实证调查)
Authors
Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, James A. Robinson
American Economic Review, 2001, 91(05)
Abstract
We exploit differences in European mortality rates to estimate the effect of institutions on economic performance. Europeans adopted very different colonization policies in different colonies, with different associated institutions. In places where Europeans faced high mortality rates, they could not settle and were more likely to set up extractive institutions. These institutions persisted to the present. Exploiting differences in European mortality rates as an instrument for current institutions, we estimate large effects of institutions on income per capita. Once the effect of institutions is controlled for, countries in Africa or those closer to the equator do not have lower incomes.
摘要
我们利用欧洲人死亡率的差异来估算制度对经济表现的影响。欧洲人在不同的殖民地采取了截然不同的殖民政策,并建立了不同的相关制度。在欧洲人面临高死亡率的地方,他们无法定居,更有可能建立采掘机构。这些制度一直延续至今。利用欧洲人死亡率的差异作为当前制度的工具,我们估计了制度对人均收入的巨大影响。一旦控制了制度的影响,非洲国家或更靠近赤道的国家的收入并不会更低。
原文链接
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
2
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply(发展差异的殖民地起源:实证调查:答复)
Authors
Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, James A. Robinson
American Economic Review, 2012, 102(06)
Abstract
Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001) established that economic institutions today are correlated with expected mortality of European colonialists. David Albouy argues this relationship is not robust. He drops all data from Latin America and much of the data from Africa, making up almost 60 percent of our sample, despite much information on the mortality of Europeans in those places during the colonial period. He also includes a "campaign" dummy that is coded inconsistently; even modest corrections undermine his claims. We also show that limiting the effect of outliers strengthens our results, making them robust to even extreme versions of Albouy's critiques.
摘要
Acemoglu、Johnson和Robinson(2001)认为,当今的经济体制与欧洲殖民者的预期死亡率相关。David Albouy认为这种关系并不稳健。他放弃了拉丁美洲的所有数据和非洲的大部分数据(占我们样本的近60%),尽管这些地方有很多关于殖民时期欧洲人死亡率的信息。他还加入了一个编码不一致的“运动”虚拟变量;即使是适度的修正也会削弱他的说法。我们还证明,限制异常值的影响会加强我们的结果,使其即使面对阿尔布伊的极端批评也能保持稳健。
原文链接
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.102.6.3077
3
Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution(命运的逆转:现代世界收入分配的地理与制度形成)
Authors
Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, James A. Robinson
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, 117(04)
Abstract
Among countries colonized by European powers during the past 500 years, those that were relatively rich in 1500 are now relatively poor. We document this reversal using data on urbanization patterns and population density, which, we argue, proxy for economic prosperity. This reversal weighs against a view that links economic development to geographic factors. Instead, we argue that the reversal reflects changes in the institutions resulting from European colonialism. The European intervention appears to have created an “institutional reversal” among these societies, meaning that Europeans were more likely to introduce institutions encouraging investment in regions that were previously poor. This institutional reversal accounts for the reversal in relative incomes. We provide further support for this view by documenting that the reversal in relative incomes took place during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, and resulted from societies with good institutions taking advantage of the opportunity to industrialize.
摘要
在过去500年间被欧洲列强殖民的国家中,那些在1500年还相对富裕的国家现在却相对贫穷。我们利用城市化模式和人口密度的数据记录了这一逆转,我们认为,城市化模式和人口密度代表了经济繁荣程度。这种逆转否定了将经济发展与地理因素联系起来的观点。相反,我们认为这种逆转反映了欧洲殖民主义导致的制度变化。欧洲的干预似乎在这些社会中造成了“制度逆转”,这意味着欧洲人更有可能在以前贫穷的地区引入鼓励投资的制度。这种制度逆转解释了相对收入的逆转。我们通过记录相对收入的逆转发生在18世纪末和19世纪初,是制度良好的社会利用机会实现工业化的结果,从而为这一观点提供了进一步的支持。
原文链接
https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/117/4/1231/1875948
4
The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change, and Economic Growth(欧洲的崛起:大西洋贸易、制度变革与经济增长)
Authors
Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, James A, Robinson
American Economic Review, 2005, 95(03)
Abstract
The rise of Western Europe after 1500 is due largely to growth in countries with access to the Atlantic Ocean and with substantial trade with the New World, Africa, and Asia via the Atlantic. This trade and the associated colonialism affected Europe not only directly, but also indirectly by inducing institutional change. Where "initial" political institutions (those established before 1500) placed significant checks on the monarchy, the growth of Atlantic trade strengthened merchant groups by constraining the power of the monarchy, and helped merchants obtain changes in institutions to protect property rights. These changes were central to subsequent economic growth.
摘要
1500年后,西欧的崛起主要归功于那些能够通往大西洋并通过大西洋与新大陆、非洲和亚洲进行大量贸易的国家的发展。这种贸易和与之相关的殖民主义不仅直接影响了欧洲,还通过引发制度变革间接影响了欧洲。在“初始”政治体制(1500年前建立的政治体制)对君主政体形成重大制约的情况下,大西洋贸易的增长通过限制君主政体的权力而加强了商人群体,并帮助商人获得了保护财产权的体制变革。这些变革对后来的经济增长至关重要。
原文链接
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/0002828054201305
5
Persistence of Power, Elites, and Institutions(权力、精英和制度的持久性)
Authors
Daron Acemoglu, James A. Robinson
American Economic Review, 2008, 98(01)
Abstract
We construct a model to study the implications of changes in political institutions for economic institutions. A change in political institutions alters the distribution of de jure political power, but creates incentives for investments in de facto political power to partially or even fully offset change in de jure power. The model can imply a pattern of captured democracy, whereby a democratic regime may survive but choose economic institutions favoring an elite. The model provides conditions under which economic or policy outcomes will be invariant to changes in political institutions, and economic institutions themselves will persist over time.
摘要
我们构建了一个模型来研究政治体制变革对经济体制的影响。政治体制的变化会改变法律上政治权力的分配,但也会刺激对事实上政治权力的投资,从而部分甚至完全抵消法律上权力的变化。该模型可能意味着一种被俘获的民主模式,即民主政权可能会存活下来,但会选择有利于精英阶层的经济体制。该模型提供了一些条件,在这些条件下,经济或政策结果将不受政治体制变化的影响,而经济体制本身也将长期存在。
原文链接
https://benny.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.98.1.267
6
Income and Democracy(收入与民主)
Author
Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, James A. Robinson, Pierre Yared
American Economic Review, 2008, 98(03)
Abstract
Existing studies establish a strong cross-country correlation between income and democracy but do not control for factors that simultaneously affect both variables. We show that controlling for such factors by including country fixed effects removes the statistical association between income per capita and various measures of democracy. We present instrumental-variables estimates that also show no causal effect of income on democracy. The cross-country correlation between income and democracy reflects a positive correlation between changes in income and democracy over the past 500 years. This pattern is consistent with the idea that societies embarked on divergent political-economic development paths at certain critical junctures.
摘要
现有研究在收入与民主之间建立了很强的跨国相关性,但没有控制同时影响这两个变量的因素。我们的研究表明,通过加入国家固定效应来控制这些因素,可以消除人均收入与各种民主指标之间的统计关联。我们提出的工具变量估计值也表明收入对民主没有因果影响。收入与民主之间的跨国相关性反映了过去500年中收入变化与民主之间的正相关性。这种模式与社会在某些关键时刻走上不同的政治经济发展道路的观点是一致的。
原文链接
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.98.3.808
7
The Consequences of Radical Reform: The French Revolution(激进改革的后果:法国大革命)
Author
Daron Acemoglu, Davide Cantoni, Simon Johnson, James A. Robinson
American Economic Review, 2011, 101(07)
Abstract
The French Revolution had a momentous impact on neighboring countries. It removed the legal and economic barriers protecting oligarchies, established the principle of equality before the law, and prepared economies for the new industrial opportunities of the second half of the 19th century. We present within-Germany evidence on the long-run implications of these institutional reforms. Occupied areas appear to have experienced more rapid urbanization growth, especially after 1850. A two-stage least squares strategy provides evidence consistent with the hypothesis that the reforms instigated by the French had a positive impact on growth.
摘要
法国大革命对周边国家产生了重大影响。它消除了保护寡头的法律和经济壁垒,确立了法律面前人人平等的原则,并为19世纪下半叶新的工业机遇做好了经济准备。我们提供了德国国内关于这些制度改革长期影响的证据。占领区似乎经历了更快速的城市化增长,尤其是在1850年之后。两阶段最小二乘法策略提供的证据与法国人发起的改革对经济增长产生积极影响的假设一致。
原文链接
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.101.7.3286
Simon Johnson
Simon Johnson现为麻省理工学院斯隆管理学院罗纳德-库尔茨创业学教授,研究方向为行为与政策科学。于1984年、1986年、1989年在牛津大学、曼彻斯特大学、麻省理工学院获得经济学与政治学学士学位、经济学硕士学位、经济学博士学位。曾就职于杜克大学,曾担任华盛顿特区彼得森国际经济研究所的高级研究员、国会预算办公室经济顾问小组的成员、联邦存款保险公司系统性解决咨询委员会成员、美国财政部金融研究办公室金融研究咨询委员会成员。研究成果发表于American Economic Review、Journal of Political Economy、Quarterly Journal of Economics、Review of Economics Studies、Journal of Finance、Journal of Financial Economics等期刊。
内容与摘要
1
Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis(亚洲金融危机中的公司治理)
Author
Simon Johnson, Peter Boone, Alasdair Breach, Eric Friedman
Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 58(1–2).
Abstract
The “Asian Crisis” of 1997–98 affected all the “emerging markets” open to capital flows. Measures of corporate governance, particularly the effectiveness of protection for minority shareholders, explain the extent of exchange rate depreciation and stock market decline better than do standard macroeconomic measures. A possible explanation is that in countries with weak corporate governance, worse economic prospects result in more expropriation by managers and thus a larger fall in asset prices.
摘要
1997-1998年的“亚洲危机”影响了所有向资本流动开放的“新兴市场”。公司治理措施,特别是对小股东保护的有效性,比标准的宏观经济措施更能解释汇率贬值和股市下跌的程度。一种可能的解释是,在公司治理薄弱的国家,较差的经济前景导致管理者更多的征用,从而使资产价格下跌更多。
原文链接
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X00000696
2
Property Rights and Finance(产权与金融)
Author
Simon Johnson, John McMillan, Christopher Woodruff
American Economic Review, 2002, 92(05)
Abstract
Which is the tighter constraint on private sector investment: weak property rights or limited access to external finance? From a survey of new firms in post-communist countries, we find that weak property rights discourage firms from reinvesting their profits, even when bank loans are available. Where property rights are relatively strong, firms reinvest their profits; where they are relatively weak, entrepreneurs do not want to invest from retained earnings.
摘要
薄弱的产权和有限的外部融资渠道哪个对私营部门投资的制约更大?通过对后共产主义国家新成立企业的调查,我们发现,产权薄弱阻碍了企业对利润进行再投资,即使在可以获得银行贷款的情况下也是如此。在产权相对较强的地方,企业会对利润进行再投资;在产权相对较弱的地方,企业家不愿用留存收益进行投资。
原文链接
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/000282802762024539
James A. Robinson
James A. Robinson,现为美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥大学教授,皮尔逊全球冲突研究与解决研究所所长,分别于1982年、1986年、1993年在伦敦政治经济学院、英国华威大学、耶鲁大学获得学士学位、硕士学位、博士学位。研究方向为政治经济学与比较政治学,经济与政治发展,主要研究兴趣包括政治和经济发展以及政治权力和制度与繁荣之间的关系。
内容与摘要
1
Political foundations of the resource curse(资源诅咒的政治基础)
Author
James A. Robinson, Ragnar Torvik, Thierry Verdier
Journal of Development Economics, 2006, 79, 2
Abstract
In this paper we argue that the political incentives that resource endowments generate are the key to understanding whether or not they are a curse. We show: (1) politicians tend to over-extract natural resources relative to the efficient extraction path because they discount the future too much, and (2) resource booms improve the efficiency of the extraction path. However, (3) resource booms, by raising the value of being in power and by providing politicians with more resources which they can use to influence the outcome of elections, increase resource misallocation in the rest of the economy. (4) The overall impact of resource booms on the economy depends critically on institutions since these determine the extent to which political incentives map into policy outcomes. Countries with institutions that promote accountability and state competence will tend to benefit from resource booms since these institutions ameliorate the perverse political incentives that such booms create. Countries without such institutions however may suffer from a resource curse.
摘要
在本文中,我们认为资源禀赋所产生的政治激励是理解资源禀赋是否是一种诅咒的关键。我们的研究表明:(1)相对于有效的开采路径,政治家倾向于过度开采自然资源,因为他们对未来打了太多折扣;(2)资源繁荣提高了开采路径的效率。然而,(3)资源繁荣提高了掌权者的价值,为政治家提供了更多的资源,他们可以利用这些资源来影响选举结果,从而增加了经济其他部分的资源错配。(4)资源繁荣对经济的总体影响主要取决于体制,因为体制决定了政治激励在多大程度上体现为政策结果。拥有促进问责制和国家能力的体制的国家往往会从资源繁荣中获益,因为这些体制可以改善这种繁荣所产生的不正常的政治激励。然而,没有这种体制的国家可能会受到资源诅咒的影响。
原文链接
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387806000137
2
The political economy of public income volatility: With an application to the resource curse(公共收入波动的政治经济学:资源诅咒的应用)
Author
James A. Robinson, Ragnar Torvik, Thierry Verdier
Journal of Public Economics, 2017, 145
Abstract
In recent years many countries have witnessed a great deal of volatility in public budgets, be it due to volatility in the access to foreign loans in Greece, or to unstable oil prices in Venezuela. We study the political consequences of such public income volatility. As is standard, in our model political incentives create inefficient policies to increase re-election probabilities, but we show that making public income uncertain creates specific new effects. Future volatility reduces the benefit of being in power, making policy more efficient. Yet at the same time it also reduces the re-election probability of an incumbent and since some of the policy inefficiencies are concentrated in the future, this makes inefficient policy, such as patronage public employment, less costly. Our model highlights a new political economy connection between the volatility of the public budget and economic growth. In the case where volatility comes from natural resource prices, a characteristic of many developing countries, we show that volatility in itself may be a source of inefficient resource extraction, jointly interacting with increased patronage employment.
摘要
近年来,许多国家的公共预算都出现了很大的波动,无论是希腊获得外国贷款的波动,还是委内瑞拉不稳定的石油价格。我们研究了这种公共收入波动的政治后果。按照惯例,在我们的模型中,政治激励会产生低效政策以提高连任概率,但我们的研究表明,公共收入的不确定性会产生特定的新影响。未来的不确定性会降低执政的收益,从而使政策更有效率。但与此同时,它也降低了在位者的连任概率,而且由于一些政策的低效集中在未来,这就使得低效政策(如赞助性公共就业)的成本降低。我们的模型强调了公共预算波动与经济增长之间新的政治经济学联系。在波动来自自然资源价格(这是许多发展中国家的特点)的情况下,我们表明,波动本身可能是低效资源开采的一个来源,并与赞助性就业的增加共同作用。
原文链接
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272716302006
(选文、整理:陆森)
阅读原文,获取更多文章信息
编辑 王静萱
监制 安然
关于我们
黄达教授是新中国“大金融”思想体系的首倡者和设计者。世纪之交,他针对经济金融全球化对中国金融学科建设提出的新挑战与新要求,重构基于中国实际的金融学科框架,首倡并系统设计“大金融”学科体系;几代学人在此基础上不断传承发扬,主张金融与实体经济相结合、宏观金融与微观金融相结合,具有鲜明“人大学派”特色的重大理论创新体系日渐形成。
本公众号由中国人民大学国际货币研究所(IMI)负责维护及推送,围绕大金融理念,专注传播优秀学术研究成果,加强大金融学术研究交流。
中国人民大学国际货币研究所(IMI)成立于2009年12月20日,是专注于货币金融理论、政策与战略研究的非营利性学术研究机构和新型专业智库。
研究所长期聚焦国际金融、货币银行、宏观经济、金融监管、金融科技、地方金融等领域,与国内外金融机构、科研院所、政策部门多次开展研究合作与学术交流,形成了《人民币国际化报告》《天府金融指数报告》《金融机构国际化报告》《中国财富管理能力评价报告》《宏观经济月度分析报告》等一大批具有重要理论和政策影响力的学术成果。
IMI定期举办国际货币论坛、货币金融(青年)圆桌会议、大金融思想沙龙、麦金农大讲坛、陶湘国际金融讲堂、IMF经济展望报告发布会、金融科技公开课等高层次系列论坛或讲座,形成了内参要报、学术月刊、中英文周报等系列研究产品。
微信号:大金融思想
(点击识别下方二维码关注我们)
文章推荐/投稿/合作 ☎️010-62516755
联系方式 📮imi@ruc.edu.cn