世界法哲学大会
IVR-World Congress 2024
International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy
国际法哲学与社会哲学协会 2024年世界大会
https://ivr2024.org/
Special
Workshop 119
第119号专题工作坊
IVR 2024 : Special Workshop
https://ivr2024.org/sub.php?menu_number=569
https://ivr2024.org/html_file.php?file=sw_119.html&file2=sw_default.html
Convenors 召集人
Fei Xiaobing
费小兵（重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院）
Fei Xiaobing (Law School of Chongqing University, China)
cicisunxiaoxi@gmail.com
SCHEDULE 议 程
This Special Workshop will be held on 12th (Tuesday) and 11th (Thursday) July 2024. Each Speaker would have 20 minutes for presentation, with 5 minutes for further discussion.
本次专题工作坊将于2024年7月12日北京时间（周五）13:00~15:00,线上召开（线下会议在韩国首尔，所以通知的首尔时间是周五下午2:00~4:00）。主讲人发言人的报告时间为40分钟，并有50分钟的后续讨论。
12thJuly 2024, 13:00~15:00（首尔时间14:00-16:00）
ZOOM线上会议：
https://zoom.us/j/99354753989?pwd=QXYdL0kIH0eFTOhvF8EOimnDcth7f3.1
Human-Subjects Rights and Artificial
Intelligence
第一单元：人类主体权利与人工智能
Moderator:Chen Jin
主持人：陈进
报告人及论文题目：
The Life First Principle: A New Benchmark for Testing Artificial Intelligence based on Replacing the Turing Test
生命优先原则：基于代替图灵测试检验人工智能的新基准
1. Fei Xiaobing（School of Cyberspace Security and Information Law, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications）
费小兵 （重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院）
SunXiaoxi (Law School of Chongqing University)
孙晓曦 （重庆大学）
Dai Yuxia(School of Cyberspace Security and Information Law, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications)
代渝霞 （重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院）
Presenters:
• Fei Xiaobing (Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications)
• Sun Xiaoxi
• Dai Yuxia
Reflecting on views such as dualism (e.g., functionalism, connectionism) that serve as justifications for strong AI based on non-dualistic neo-Daoism and other new philosophies of science and technology, this paper finds that Searle's sense of the problem consists in refuting the residual dualistic justifications of AGI theorists, who assert that the mind is dichotomous from the body and AGI is capable of egoenabled birth to a mind-consciousness. Is it really the case? The problem of the Turing test is that as long as mental consciousness is not introduced in AI, which doesn’t have the same quintessential structure as life, how can it as a third-person know whether the first-person AI's understanding is really based on consciousness or on an inorganic anthropomorphic programmed evolution?
By reflecting on this and analyzing the differences between human life and unconscious AI, this paper deduces that the Dao in the phenomenal realm presents itself as a hierarchical development from inorganic, organic to spiritual life. Non-living AI has only inorganic matter and energy as its two elements, while life of the plant has only organic matter and structural energy, and spiritual life has its spirit, that is, a system chemically combined and isomorphized by three elements as organic matter, structural energy, and spirit. Therefore, the differences between life and unconscious AI is that life has one more element, namely, "God" (spirit, consciousness) than AI that only has matter and energy, and thus unconscious AI can be programmed to "measure accuracy" and react spontaneously, while Life enjoys the flexibility, imperceptible "conscious" response and its physical -mental interactions, that is, life is an internal process of change, not an entity. Algorithms cannot be capable of abiding by the law of nature and covering the whole range of the world in that there is a possibility for the human spirit to reach pure conscience, but conscience is born in response to something and perishes without human spirit in that it not an entity. Besides, algorithms are expressed only through logic symbols. Human life can have "extra-verbal meanings", which are not expressed through language, and one of the characteristics of life is that its energy is a life-sustaining, structural energy (qi) that can be transformed into organic matter.
Therefore, to be a self-consistent living being, AI should also be an isomorphism and an incarnation of essence (matter, energy, and consciousness), but not just a sufficiency of life when intelligence mimics the functional traces of the psyche of life as understood by Rehoboth Functionalism. Whether it is based on carbon or silicon, if a strong artificial intelligence is born, it will not be based on dualistic thinking, but will only be born under non-dualistic thinking by scientists putting consciousness into AI, which will result in a synthesized life feature with a body and mind that are isomorphic with essence, energy and spirit, as well as its true intuition and consciousness. The Turing test should be replaced by this integrated life feature as a new benchmark for testing artificial intelligence. The deeper reason for "robots must not harm individual human beings" is based on the principle of the priority of life, i.e., the principle of the priority of life means that whether it is carbon-based, siliconbased, or whatever, it must be characterized by the indivisibility of mind and matter, or the inseparability of essence and spirit and their mutual interaction to be visible life on Earth, so that life is prioritized over non-life. Related to this, the subject of criminal punishment has a comprehensive life characteristic such as essence, spirit, emotion and will, and so does civil law and other laws. If they do not have this comprehensive life characteristic, they cannot be subjects of law.
The END
龙登高教授讲座三场｜听民自便-基层自治 & 分家与否-中西之别 & 产权理论创新
龙登高教授爱丁堡大学&曼彻斯特中国研究院演讲|地权制度及变迁&英文新书-【历史上的土地·租佃·社会】专题【地权篇】之【特别篇】
中国学术在全球 | 龙登高牛津讲座：本土传统与海外演化：华人社会自发秩序及其适应力
卜正民线上谈全球17世纪｜法与交叉学科国际学会+全球研究论坛+北大高研院合办
6.27早9点直播｜卜正民打开【法与交叉学科国际学会】首次讲座-北大高研院 全球研究论坛合办
Premier Historian Lecture: Tim Brook on the Global 17th Century
【法与交叉学科国际学会】第二次活动｜北大高研院+北大出版社主办圆桌：《人类进化中的宗教》新书谈
【法与交叉学科国际学会】合办|北大高研院+北大出版社主办圆桌：《人类进化中的宗教》新书谈
汇集海内外名校名家！【法与交叉学科国际学会】各委员会名单，欢迎加入学会！
【法与交叉学科国际学会】指导委员会委员-中英文简介，欢迎加入学会！
欢迎加入【法与交叉学科国际学会】及编辑团队！官方微信号【法与交叉学科】启航
International Association for Law and Interdisciplinary Studies!
IALIS Advisory Council Members-Profiles
声明
【法与交叉学科国际学会】及官方微信公众号【法与交叉学科】所发布、转载、组织的著作、文章、演讲、发言，所有内容与看法仅属于原作者与原讲者，不代表【法与交叉学科】的立场和观点。
