不如小学生?成年人计算和读写能力下降 | 外刊精读

文摘   2024-12-19 16:27   江苏  
⭐️阅读提示
本篇文章【精读+翻译PDF】见阅读训练营
免费【原文PDF】文末扫码进读者群



01 选文来源 

The Economist-20241214LeadersBrain drain: Can you read as well as a ten-year-old?


02 全文梳理    

【Para1】引入话题👉经合组织每隔约十年就会对各国成年人解决问题的能力进行测试。

【Para2】最新测试👉结果表明,越来越多发达国家的成年人数学和读写能力确实下降了。

【Para3-4】原因分析

       -para3 表层原因👉人口结构变化如新移民的涌入及人口老龄化、新媒体的发展、教育系统等。

       -para4 深层原因👉技术变革使得人们不太重视基础能力的培养,当前教育主要围绕软技能和技术。

【Para5】不良后果👉技术发展并未使得基本能力的重要性下降,且基本技能较差的人在社会上也更为弱势。

【Para6-7】改变策略

       -para6 改进方案👉政府应该对青少年制定更严格的考试制度和内容,并要求学生通过基本测试。

       -para7 完善系统👉政府还应该完善成人教育系统,提升他们的技能。

【Para8】作者点评👉抓紧提升年轻人的教育质量同时给年长者提供机会,双管齐下才是明智之举。

03 原文阅读 678words

Brain drain: Can you read as well as a ten-year-old?

Adults in rich countries are less literate than they were a decade ago. That requires attention


[1] DOES IT OFTEN feel as if the world is getting stupider? Data released on December 10th by the OECD, a club of mostly rich countries, suggest this may not be all in your head. Roughly every ten years the organisation asks adults in dozens of places to sit tests in numeracy and literacy. The questions it poses are not abstract brainteasers, spelling tests or mental arithmetic. They aim to mimic problems people aged 16-65 face in daily life, whether they are working in a factory or an office, or simply trying to make sense of the news.


[2] The latest tests were carried out in 31 rich countries, and their findings are unnerving. They suggest that a fifth of adults do no better in maths and reading than might be expected of a primary-school child. The direction of travel is even less encouraging. In maths, average scores have risen in a few places over the past ten years, but fallen in almost as many. In literacy, a lot more countries have seen scores decline than advance, despite the fact that adults hold more and higher educational qualifications than ever before.


[3] 

Demographic change offers some explanation. New immigrants often struggle with a new language. The native-born have ageing brains. But even after adjusting for this, trends remain gloomy, especially in literacy. Some speculate that Netflix, video games and social media are sapping acuity. It is just as likely that education and training systems have misfired.

[4] These disappointing results deserve more attention than they are likely to get. Basic numeracy and literacy are oddly unfashionable causes—especially when adults lack them. Students of education prefer to debate how to teach fashionable “soft skills”. Hype around generative artificial intelligence does not help: harping on about the importance of times-tables seems even more fuddy-duddy when talking robots promise to do all the hard work.

[5] 

Yet a century of technological upheaval has not cut demand for people who are good with numbers, or who have a way with words. Adults who do badly in the OECD’s tests earn vastly less than those who ace them. They are also in poorer health, less satisfied with their life, less trusting of others and more likely to feel that they have no voice in politics. In many countries the gap in ability between the highest- and lowest-skilled grown-ups is widening (not because smarty-pants are doing better, but because the least able are doing worse). Writ large, such trends lead nowhere good.

[6] What to do? Improving lessons for children is the surest way of creating more capable grown-ups; governments ought to start there. England’s adults have crept up the OECD’s league table, mostly because the youngest ones (aged 16-24) are scoring better than before. That may reflect reforms which have made exams for older teenagers more difficult, and begun requiring youngsters who fail them to try again. In America, which has done fairly badly, states are junking tests that were in the past used to determine who graduated from high school. Grades there are inflating unchecked.


[7] The second task is to oil creaking systems for educating adults. These hand dropouts second chances; they also serve people who change careers and help migrants integrate. Yet politicians grant them paltry budgets, in part because they underestimate the trickiness of what they are being asked to accomplish. People with the weakest skills tend to have the least time and money for self-improvement. They are less likely to attend adult classes, or get training, even though they are the most in need.


[8] In too many places a mania for universities has sapped funding and focus from all the other kinds of lessons that people aged 18 and above could be offered. Degrees are becoming less meaningful: the OECD has found that even some university graduates post numeracy and literacy scores that might embarrass a child. Meanwhile, oldies who want to return to class without embarking on long, expensive university courses often find good alternatives are lacking. Accelerating efforts to fix all these problems seems like a bright idea.  


--END--
原文为转载不代表本公众号观点

每天一篇经济学人团队

来自北大、复旦、南大、人大、

北外、上外、外交学院

重点高校专业的学长学姐CATTI一笔二笔

多年教学经验的留学老师

十余年外刊翻译经验的英语大牛

专注打磨阅读训练营1700天+

输出高质量内容、高水平译文

扫码了解双语阅读训练营

每天一篇经济学人
【每天一篇外刊精读】一个经济学人爱好者的聚集地。团队成员有来自北大、复旦、上交、南大、人大、上外、北外等高校专业的学长学姐,每天一篇外刊精读,从本质上提升英语阅读能力!
 最新文章