研究生学历加速贬值,该怎么办?| 外刊精读

文摘   2024-12-02 16:42   江苏  
⭐️阅读提示
本篇文章【精读+翻译PDF】见阅读训练营
免费【原文PDF】文末扫码进读者群



01 选文来源 

The Economist-20241123LeadersHigher education: Diminishing returns


02 全文梳理    

【para1】学位激增👉年轻人不再满足于学士学位,美国和英国的研究生教育需求大增。

【para2】硕士热潮👉硕士课程因就业需要而备受追捧,但许多学生仅因竞争环境趋于激烈而追求更高学历。

【para3-4】盲目追求硕士学位的隐患

      -para3 回报有限👉研究发现部分硕士学位对收入的提升作用甚微,甚至带来经济负担。

      -para4 债务隐患👉高昂学费和低效课程让许多学生背负沉重债务,而政府贷款和减免政策加重了财政负担。

【para5-6】两大应对措施

      -para5 调整政策👉政府应调整政策,避免研究生教育市场扭曲。

      -para6 提升信息透明度👉政府应公开如不同专业回报率、辍学率和未来收入的具体数据,以帮助学生做出明智选择。

【para7】规范改革👉美国尝试通过新规要求高校警示低收益、高负债课程,其他国家也应考虑类似政策。


03 原文阅读 598words

Higher education: Diminishing returns

The benefits of doing a master's degree are smaller than they appear


[1] FOR YOUNG people with big ambitions, bagging a measly bachelor’s degree no longer seems enough. Students in America have been rushing into postgraduate courses, even as demand for higher education among the general public has declined. These days nearly 40% of university-educated Americans boast at least two degrees. In Britain a surge in demand from foreign students has created a huge boom in postgraduate education. Universities there now dole out four postgraduate qualifications for every five undergraduate ones.

[2] Master’s degrees lasting one or two years are the biggest draw. These courses are necessary for jobs, such as teaching in academia, that are appealing even if poorly paid. Yet many of the people who enroll in postgraduate study are taking part in an educational arms race. Now that undergraduate degrees are common, goes the thinking, it takes extra credentials to get ahead. The hope is that advanced qualifications will boost all manner of careers.


[3] That is often a mistake. New data are helping researchers compare the earnings of postgraduates with those of peers who are equally bright but have only a bachelor’s degree. One analysis suggests that more than 40% of America’s master’s courses provide graduates with no financial return or leave them worse off, after considering costs and what they might have earned anyway. A study in Britain concludes that completing a master’s has, on average, almost no effect on earnings by the time graduates are 35.


[4] Dreadful returns to lofty qualifications should worry students and politicians alike. Governments are right to think that investing in skills can pep up growth—but not when universities are flabby and inefficient. It is not just students who suffer if poor courses burden them with outrageous debts; taxpayers do, too. About half the money the American government lends to students each year is for postgraduate degrees. Generous repayment and forgiveness schemes mean a big chunk of that will never be repaid.


[5] Governments should respond in two ways. First, they should abandon policies that are distorting the market for postgraduate study. America does not limit what it will lend postgraduates for tuition fees. This blank cheque has created a culture of profligacy in which universities raise fees, obliterating the financial returns students might ultimately make. Britain has also slipped up, though in a different and sneaky way. For a decade it has mostly declined to let universities increase fees for undergraduates, even as inflation has caused their costs to rise. In order to make up for that financial shortfall, vice-chancellors have vastly expanded expensive postgraduate programmes, some of which are of dubious quality.


[6] The second priority for governments should be to give students the data they need to make better choices. A chasm divides the riches that flow from getting the most lucrative master’s, such as in computer science, from the meagre returns of English or film studies. Fees vary wildly by institution, even for very similar programmes. And yet people shopping for postgraduate education find it much harder to get hold of informationon matters such as drop-out rates or probable future earnings—than people applying for their first degrees.


Masterstroke

[7] America is trying to change this. Under new rules, graduate colleges may soon be compelled to warn applicants before they sign up for courses that have a record of saddling students with low wages and high debts. Donald Trump, who likes to lambast college presidents, should make sure these changes take place. And regulators in other countries should consider similar schemes. Higher education ought to make students brainier and richer. It too often fails to do either 



--END--
原文为转载不代表本公众号观点

每天一篇经济学人团队

来自北大、复旦、南大、人大、

北外、上外、外交学院

重点高校专业的学长学姐CATTI一笔二笔

多年教学经验的留学老师

十余年外刊翻译经验的英语大牛

专注打磨阅读训练营1700天+

输出高质量内容、高水平译文

扫码了解双语阅读训练营

每天一篇经济学人
【每天一篇外刊精读】一个经济学人爱好者的聚集地。团队成员有来自北大、复旦、上交、南大、人大、上外、北外等高校专业的学长学姐,每天一篇外刊精读,从本质上提升英语阅读能力!
 最新文章