JAERE
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (JAERE)于2014年创刊,是环境与资源经济学家协会(Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, AERE)主办的双月刊,是资源与环境经济学领域公认的国际顶级期刊。
1. 间歇性或不确定性?可再生能源对电力市场的影响
2. 市场失灵是否会在循环经济中造成“耐久性差距”?
3. 备用电源:私人替代品对电网可靠性的公共影响(JAERE主编推荐文章)
4. 太阳能地球工程、学习和实验
5. 禁止低能效产品:市场反应与调整成本
6. 中国废物进口禁令与美国固体废物管理:废物“避风港”消失的影响
7. 网约车服务加剧了交通拥堵和空气污染?Uber进入加州的证据
8. 爆“火”:亚马逊地区的大众关注度和环境保护行动
JAERE主编推荐文章
本期导读
01
可再生能源资源具有独特的特性——间歇性和不确定性,这给电网运营带来了挑战。我们的研究表明,相较于间歇性(以每小时风力发电变化表示),不确定性(以风力预测误差表示)对电网的影响更为显著。与准确预测的风力发电相比,不确定性会导致电网运行的边际成本几乎翻倍。同时,由于常规发电机需要启动以维持电网平衡,调度成本也会随之增加。考虑到研究期间风力发电不确定性的持续存在,这一发现尤为重要:如果将风力预测误差降低到与需求预测误差相当的水平,每年可节省约五十万美元的成本。
原文:Weber, P., & Woerman, M. (2024). Intermittency or Uncertainty? Impacts of Renewable Energy in Electricity Markets. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 11(6), 1351-1385. https://doi.org/10.1086/729841
题目:Do Market Failures Create a “Durability Gap” in the Circular Economy?(市场失灵是否会在循环经济中造成“耐久性差距”?)
作者:Don Fullerton, Shan He
摘要:The interdisciplinary circular economy literature recommends longer-lasting products, to reduce pollution from repeated production and disposal. For any type of appliance, we assume that consumers choose among variants with different durability. Firms are competitive. Standard Pigouvian analysis shows that optimal taxes depend on pollution and not on product life. Here, we find conditions where consumers choose lives that are too short—a “durability gap.” First, we show that suboptimal existing output taxes imply suboptimal durability. An increase in uniform tax on all variants encourages purchase of a more durable variant and raises welfare. Second, welfare also is raised by a subsidy for choosing a more durable variant or by a marginally binding durability mandate. Third, we find that a social discount rate less than the private rate is the strongest case for policy to favor durability. Fourth, the consumer misperceptions we study have ambiguous implications for durability policy.
跨学科的循环经济文献建议生产更耐用的产品,以减少因重复生产和处置而产生的污染。对于任何类型的电器,我们假设消费者在不同耐用性的型号之间进行选择,且企业处于竞争性的市场。标准的庇古税分析表明,最优税收应基于污染程度而非产品寿命。然而,我们发现消费者选择的产品寿命往往过短,形成了“耐用性差距”。首先,现有的次优产出税导致了次优的耐用性。增加对所有型号的统一税收可以鼓励购买更耐用的型号,从而提升整体福利水平。其次,通过对选择更耐用型号实施补贴或设定边际约束的强制购买耐用性型号电器要求,也能提高整体福利。第三,我们发现社会折现率低于私人折现率是政策支持耐用性的最有力理由。最后,消费者认知偏差对耐用性政策的影响尚不明确。
原文:Fullerton, D., & He, S. (2024). Do Market Failures Create a “Durability Gap” in the Circular Economy? Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 11(6), 1387-1417. https://doi.org/10.1086/729541
题目:Backup Power: Public Implications of Private Substitutes for Electric Grid Reliability(备用电源:私人替代品对电网可靠性的公共影响)
作者:Paul A. Brehm, Sarah Johnston, Ross Milton
摘要:Private substitutes for electric grid reliability are common. We study their adoption and distributional implications. We first show that US households buy substitutes in response to a perceived decrease in grid reliability and that higher-income households are more likely to adopt them. We then develop a theoretical model of public provision of grid reliability in the presence of private substitutes that is consistent with these facts. The existence of substitutes increases aggregate welfare and reduces the efficient level of reliability spending. Using a calibrated version of the model, we find that, even though only a few households adopt batteries, most nonadopting households benefit from their availability. Battery adoption reduces utilities’ reliability spending, resulting in lower electricity bills for all customers. Most nonadopting households value these bill savings more than the reduced grid reliability.
通过安装私人备用电源以提升电网可靠性的做法十分常见。我们研究了这些私人替代方案的使用情况及对不同人群的影响。首先,我们发现感知到公共电网可靠性下降的家庭和高收入的家庭更可能使用私人电源。我们基于上述事实构建了一个理论模型,以模拟在考虑存在私人备用电源的情况下公共电网的可靠性供应情况。结果发现,替代方案的存在不仅提高了社会整体福利,还降低了实现电网可靠性的有效支出水平。通过对模型进行校准,我们进一步发,即便只有少数家庭安装私人备用电源,大多数未安装的家庭也会从中受益。私人备用电源的使用减少了公共电网在可靠性方面的支出,从而降低了所有居民的电费。相较于电网可靠性的降低,大多数未安装私人替代电网的家庭更看重节省电费带来的收益。
原文:Brehm, P. A., Johnston, S., & Milton, R. (2024). Backup Power: Public Implications of Private Substitutes for Electric Grid Reliability. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 11(6), 1419-1445. https://doi.org/10.1086/730158
题目:Solar Geoengineering, Learning, and Experimentation(太阳能地球工程、学习和实验)
作者:David L. Kelly, Garth Heutel, Juan B. Moreno-Cruz, Soheil Shayegh
摘要:Solar geoengineering (SGE) can offset climate change by directly reducing temperatures. Both SGE and climate change itself are surrounded by great uncertainties. Implementing SGE affects learning about these uncertainties. We model endogenous learning over two uncertainties: the sensitivity of temperatures to carbon concentrations (the climate sensitivity) and the effectiveness of SGE in lowering temperatures. We present both theoretical and simulation results from an integrated assessment model, focusing on the informational value of SGE experimentation. Surprisingly, under current calibrated conditions, SGE deployment slows learning, causing a less informed decision. For any reasonably sized experimental SGE deployment, the temperature change becomes closer to zero and thus more obscured by noisy weather shocks. Still, some SGE use is optimal despite, not because of, its informational value. The optimal amount of SGE is very sensitive to beliefs about both uncertainties.
太阳能地球工程 (SGE) 可以通过直接降低温度来缓解气候变化。然而,SGE和气候变化本身都充满巨大的不确定性。实施SGE会影响对这些不确定性的学习。我们构建了一个内生学习模型,考虑了主要的两种不确定性:(1)温度对碳浓度的敏感性(气候敏感性)的不确定性;(2)SGE降低温度效果的不确定性。通过综合评估模型的理论和模拟结果,我们重点关注SGE实验的信息价值。令人意外的是,在当前校准条件下,SGE的实施会减缓对不确定性的学习速度,进而导致不明智的决策。这是因为任何合理规模的实验性SGE的实施都会使得温度变化接近于零,且更容易受到天气冲击噪音的干扰。然而,尽管SGE的价值有限,一些 SGE实验项目仍然是最佳方案。SGE的最佳部署规模对这两种不确定性的信念非常敏感。
原文:Kelly, D. L., Heutel, G., Moreno-Cruz, J. B., & Shayegh, S. (2024). Solar Geoengineering, Learning, and Experimentation. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 11(6), 1447–1486. https://doi.org/10.1086/729608
题目:Banning Products with Low Energy Efficiency: Market Response and Adjustment Cost(禁止低能效产品:市场反应与调整成本)
作者:Thiess Buettner, Anne Kesselring
摘要:This study analyzes a regulation that banned household appliances with energy efficiency below a minimum standard from the European Union’s common market in 2014. Based on a dataset reporting unit sales at product level, we conduct an empirical analysis of the product-characteristics space. This permits us to explore the market response in terms of energy efficiency and size of products and to estimate the adjustment cost. Though our results show that the product ban induced a sizable market transformation toward products with higher energy efficiency, we find that the minimum standard is set inefficiently low: if the regulation banned a larger segment of the market, higher energy savings could be obtained at lower adjustment cost.
本研究分析了2014年欧盟实施的一项法规,该法规禁止能效低于最低标准的家用电器进入市场。基于产品层面的单位销售额数据集,我们对产品特征空间进行了实证分析。我们探索市场对能效和产品规模的反应,并估算了企业的调整成本。我们的结果表明,虽然产品能效禁令推动了市场向能效更高的产品转型,但目前设置的最低标准远低于最优水平:如果将最低能效标准进一步提高,可以在较低的调整成本下实现更大的能源节约。
原文:Buettner, T., & Kesselring, A. (2024). Banning Products with Low Energy Efficiency: Market Response and Adjustment Cost. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 11(6), 1487–1526. https://doi.org/10.1086/730148
题目:China’s Waste Import Ban and US Solid Waste Management: Effects of the Loss of a Waste Haven(中国废物进口禁令与美国固体废物管理:废物“避风港”消失的影响)
作者:Hilary Sigman, Rachel Strow
摘要:China banned imports of several types of postconsumer recyclable waste beginning in 2018. We examine the effects of this ban on municipal solid waste management in the United States, using affected exports before the ban to measure differential exposure. We find that the ban increased the amount of waste disposed in landfills but had at most a small effect on solid waste combustion. Exposure to the ban is associated with declines in postconsumer recycling activity. Over 20% of the displaced scrap paper was diverted to other importing countries, whereas plastic exports to other countries fell, perhaps because of the ban’s broader impact on recycling. The results are consistent with the waste havens hypothesis: restricting trade in postconsumer waste shifted environmental damage to the exporting country.
中国从2018年开始禁止进口多种消费后可回收的废物。我们使用禁令前受影响的出口量,评估了该政策对美国城市固体废物管理的差异化影响。研究发现,禁令增加了垃圾填埋场的垃圾量,但对固体废物的燃烧几乎没有影响。禁令暴露与消费后回收活动的减少密切相关。禁令对回收产生了更广泛的影响,超过20%的废纸被转移到其他进口国,而塑料的出口显著减少。我们的结果与“废物避风港”假说一致:限制消费后废物贸易将环境损害转移到了出口国。
原文:Sigman, H., & Strow, R. (2024). China’s Waste Import Ban and US Solid Waste Management: Effects of the Loss of a Waste Haven. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 11(6), 1527–1557. https://doi.org/10.1086/729899
题目:Do Ride-Hailing Services Worsen Freeway Congestion and Air Quality? Evidence from Uber’s Entry in California(网约车服务加剧了交通拥堵和空气污染?Uber进入加州的证据)
作者:Chandra Kiran B. Krishnamurthy, Nicole S. Ngo
摘要:We investigate the effects of Uber’s entry into California on freeway traffic and pollution. We use a panel difference-in-differences design and exploit variation in the timing and occurrence of Uber’s entry into different counties using hourly freeway traffic data and daily pollution data between 2009 and 2017. We find reductions in weekday freeway congestion and PM2.5 concentration in the average county entered. However, this reduction occurs at off-peak times and in less populated counties. During the evening rush hour and in the most populated counties, we find increases in congestion and air pollution. We estimate that Uber’s entry resulted in an overall net congestion cost varying between $1.4 and $13.9 million for counties where and time periods that already experience the highest congestion.
我们调查了Uber进入加州对高速公路交通和污染的影响。通过利用Uber进入的时间和地点的差异,我们设计了面板双重差分模型,并使用了2009年至2017年间每小时高速公路的交通数据和每日污染数据。我们发现,平均而言,Uber进入的地区在工作日的高速公路拥堵和PM2.5污染均有所降低,但这种改善主要发生在非高峰时段和人口较少的县。在晚高峰和人口密集的县,拥堵和空气污染反而有所增加。我们估计,在已经经历严重拥堵的县和时间段,Uber的进入导致了140万到1390万美元的净拥堵成本。
原文:Krishnamurthy, C. K. B., & Ngo, N. S. (2024). Do Ride-Hailing Services Worsen Freeway Congestion and Air Quality? Evidence from Uber’s Entry in California. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 11(6), 1559–1603. https://doi.org/10.1086/729901
题目:Going Viral: Public Attention and Environmental Action in the Amazon(爆“火”:亚马逊地区的大众关注度和环境保护行动)
作者:Rafael Araujo, Francisco Costa, Teevrat Garg
摘要:International agreements to reduce anthropogenic environmental disasters rely on public pressure to drive local action. We study whether focused media and increased public attention can drive local environmental action, reducing environmental damage. Although an annual affair, forest fires in the Brazilian Amazon went viral in August 2019, receiving unprecedented public scrutiny. Comparing active fires in Brazil versus those in Peru and Bolivia in a difference-in-differences design, we find that increased public attention reduced fires by 22%, avoiding 24.8 million tons of CO2 in emissions. Our results highlight the power of public attention to compel local action on pressing environmental issues.
减少人为环境灾害的国际协议依靠公众压力来推动当地行动。我们研究媒体报道和公众关注度的提高能否推动当地的环境保护行动,减少环境破坏。尽管巴西亚马逊地区每年都会发生森林大火,但2019年8月的森林大火却迅速蔓延,引发了前所未有的公众关注。使用双重差分设计,我们比较了巴西、秘鲁和玻利维亚的火灾数据,发现公众关注度的提高使火灾减少了22%,从而避免了2480万吨二氧化碳排放。我们的研究结果强调了公众关注在激励当地采取行动、解决环境问题方面的重要力量。
原文:Araujo, R., Costa, F., & Garg, T. (2024). Going Viral: Public Attention and Environmental Action in the Amazon. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 11(6), 1605–1627. https://doi.org/10.1086/731080
阅读原文,获取更多文章信息
图片来源网络,侵删
关于我们
更多信息请见E3M主页:
https://www.cityu.edu.hk/see_eeem/index.html
本期作者:林安岚,香港城市大学博士生
孙 傲,中国人民大学博士生
本期责编:李 强,香港城市大学博士生
本期主编:董涵敏,华中师范大学 讲师
相关推文:
微信号:能源与可持续发展经济学
(点击识别下方二维码关注我们)
文章推荐/投稿/合作联系方式
📧xyhao5-c@my.cityu.edu.hk