Urban Studies 每年投稿量为1000多篇，每年发表16期，共180篇论文左右。由于稿件量大，文章从接收到正式出版周期较长，因此编辑部会在稿件接收排版后的第一时间在网上发布论文全文 (Online First) 。“论文快递”栏目将同步推出网上刊登的最新论文，方便读者了解Urban Studies的最新动态，敬请关注！
本期为“论文快递”栏目的第二百六十三期，将介绍Urban Studies Online First中的五篇论文。主题包括紧凑城市与郊区密集化，绅士化和治安管理的联系，城市数字化下的居民互动，绅士化与街区满意度之间的关系，以及战术城市化与“开放城市”框架。欢迎阅读。
Delivering suburban densification: Diverse resident groups and strategies of support and resistance
实现郊区密集化：不同的居民群体以及支持和抵抗策略
Kristian J Ruming（澳大利亚麦考瑞大学）Simon Pinnegar（澳大利亚新南威尔士大学）Laura Crommelin（澳大利亚新南威尔士大学）Charles Gillon（澳大利亚新南威尔士大学）Hazel Easthope（澳大利亚新南威尔士大学）Suburbs are at the forefront of urban change, with urban policy looking to increase the density of suburban centres. Thus, the compact city has emerged as a dominant urban policy paradigm, where policy settings are configured to enable densification in designated centres. For some, this is a form of post-suburbanism, characterised by new drivers, experiences and outcomes of suburban redevelopment pressures. However, suburban densification can emerge as a site of contestation as diverse interests, such as residents, developers and governments, come together. We explore three suburban centres in Sydney, Australia, to identify the diverse array of resident positions, objectives and strategies that emerge in response to suburban densification. Drawing from literature on NIMBY (not-in-my-backyard), YIMBY (yes-in-my-backyard) and urban growth machines, we establish an analytical framework that disrupts simple pro- and anti-development positions, identifying five resident groups: supporters; resisters; opponents; expansionists; and beneficiaries.
郊区处于城市变革的前沿，城市政策致力于增加郊区中心的密度。因此，紧凑城市已成为占主导地位的城市政策范式，其中的政策设置旨在实现指定中心的密集化。有些人认为这是后郊区化的一种形式，其特点是郊区重建压力带来新动力、新经验和新结果。然而，随着居民、开发商和政府等不同利益群体的聚集，郊区密集化可能会成为争论的焦点。我们考察了澳大利亚悉尼的三个郊区中心，以确定为应对郊区密集化而出现的各种居民立场、目标和策略。根据有关邻避症候群（NIMBY）、迎臂效应（YIMBY）和城市增长机器的文献，我们建立了一个分析框架，打破了要么支持发展，要么反对发展的简单立场，确定了五个居民群体：支持者；抵抗者；反对者；扩张主义者和受益者。
community, land use, neighbourhood, planning, redevelopment/regeneration, resident participation, suburbs
社区、土地使用、街区、规划、重建/更新、居民参与、郊区https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241266175Proximity to gentrification and order maintenance policing: How the diffusion of urban renewal amplifies formal social control
邻近绅士化与治安维护：城市更新的扩散如何扩大正式的社会管理
Lallen T Johnson（美国影响正义组织）
Prior studies find that neighbourhoods abutting gentrifying spaces are viewed as ideal for capital investments and thereby subjected to increased police attention. Yet the categorical operationalisation of gentrification in such work presents limitations, particularly given that it is a spatial process. This area of scholarship also warrants a theoretical explanation of the diffusion of urban redevelopment and disorder policing. We address these voids by integrating the literatures of urban studies and crime and deviance to theorise the linkage between nearby gentrification and disorder policing. Using negative binomial regression models to analyse three years of arrest records from the Washington, DC Metropolitan Police Department, we find that the occurrence of gentrification in nearby block groups is associated with increased order maintenance arrests in the average block group. This work demonstrates that the risk of disorder-related regulation extends beyond the bounds of high-value communities, further exposing socioeconomically marginalised groups to the risks of criminal justice contact.先前的研究发现，毗邻绅士化区域的街区被视为资本投资的理想之地，因此会受到警方更多关注。然而，这些研究将绅士化过程绝对化，因此存在着局限性，特别是考虑到它是一个空间过程。这一领域的学术研究也需要对城市再开发和治安管理的扩散进行理论解释。我们通过整合城市研究和犯罪与越轨方面的文献来填补这些空白，以说明临近的绅士化和治安管理之间的联系。我们使用负二项回归模型分析了华盛顿特区大都会警察局三年的逮捕记录，发现临近街区群中绅士化的出现与普通街区群中治安维护逮捕的增加有关。本文表明，治安监管风险超出了高价值社区的范围，进一步使社会经济边缘群体面临刑事司法接触的风险。
crime, displacement, gentrification, policing, redevelopment, regeneration, social order, Washington DC
犯罪、流离失所、绅士化、治安维护、再开发、更新、社会秩序、华盛顿特区https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241265594Local familiar strangers in digitalising urban neighbourhoods in Seoul
首尔数字化城市街区中本地熟悉的陌生人
The purpose of this study is to examine how localised information and communication technologies (ICTs) use is related to interactions with local familiar strangers, from the perspective of communication infrastructure theory. More specifically, we examine (1) how individuals differ in terms of their relationships with local familiar strangers; (2) how individual-level socio-economic factors affect the scope and intensity of such relationships; (3) which individual-level communication factors (i.e. integrated connectedness to a community storytelling network, or ICSN) come into play in such relationships; and (4) how individual use of ICT affects the scope and intensity of such relationships. This study uses in-person survey data (n = 2001) collected in Seoul in the autumn of 2019. We found that more than half of the respondents communicate at least occasionally with local familiar strangers in their neighbourhoods. However, there were relatively fewer interactions with local familiar strangers from local businesses and local institutions. Females, older people and the more educated were more likely to interact with local familiar strangers. ICSN was positively and strongly associated with interactions with local familiar strangers. Localised ICT use was generally negatively related to interactions with local familiar strangers. This negative relationship between localised ICT use and interaction with local familiar strangers is moderated by ICSN. For residents with lower ICSN, localised ICT use and interactions with local familiar strangers were clearly negatively related, and for those with higher ICSN, the two variables assume a U-shaped relationship.本文的目的是从通信基础设施理论的角度，考察本地化信息通信技术 (ICT) 的使用与人们和本地熟悉的陌生人的互动之间的关系。具体来说，我们考察（1）不同的个人与本地熟悉的陌生人的关系有何不同；（2）个人层面的社会经济因素如何影响这种关系的范围和强度；（3）哪些个人层面的沟通因素（即与社区故事讲述网络—ICSN 的综合联系）在这种关系中发挥作用；（4）个人对 ICT 的使用如何影响这种关系的范围和强度。本文使用了 2019 年秋季在首尔收集的现场调查数据 (n = 2001)。我们发现超过一半的受访者至少偶尔会与他们所在街区熟悉的陌生人交流。然而，他们与来自于本地企业和机构的熟悉的陌生人的互动相对较少。女性、老年人和受教育程度较高的人更有可能与本地熟悉的陌生人互动。ICSN 与受访者和本地熟悉的陌生人的互动呈正向且密切的相关。本地化 ICT 的使用通常与受访者和本地熟悉的陌生人的互动呈负相关。ICSN 可以缓和它们两者之间的这种负相关关系。对于 ICSN 较低的居民，本地 ICT 的使用与其和本地熟悉的陌生人的互动明显呈负相关，而对于 ICSN 较高的居民，这两个变量呈现 U 形关系。
communication, familiar stranger, neighbourhood, smart city, urban digitalisation通信、熟悉的陌生人、街区、智慧城市、城市数字化
https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241264646Gentrification and neighbourhood satisfaction: A study of Philadelphia
绅士化与街区满意度：费城研究
Yeonhwa Lee（美国宾夕法尼亚大学）
Vincent J Reina（美国宾夕法尼亚大学）
首次出版时间：2024/08/19｜研究论文
Abstract
Neighbourhood satisfaction is an important facet of life and consideration for policy, as it affects one’s quality of life and well-being, as well as broader residential mobility patterns. While studies have addressed gentrification’s various outcomes, especially residential displacement, few have investigated the relationship between gentrification and neighbourhood satisfaction. Using data from the 2016 Philadelphia Housing and Neighbourhood Survey and mixed-effects logistic regression models, this paper explores the relationship between gentrification and neighbourhood satisfaction, examining how it varies by gentrification type, respondent race, and length of residence. We find that, while gentrification is overall positively associated with neighbourhood satisfaction, its effect on neighbourhood satisfaction is heterogeneous by gentrification type, respondent race, and length of residence. Specifically, when examined by type, only moderate gentrification is positively associated with neighbourhood satisfaction. Hispanic residents and non-Hispanic Black residents are less likely to be satisfied in gentrifying neighbourhoods than in non-gentrifying neighbourhoods. Lastly, gentrification is not significantly associated with neighbourhood satisfaction among long-term residents.
街区满意度是生活的一个重要方面，也是政策考量的一个重要方面，因为它影响人们的生活质量和福祉，以及更广泛的居住迁移模式。虽然之前的研究已经探讨了绅士化的各种结果，特别是居民流离失所，但很少有研究考察绅士化和街区满意度之间的关系。本文利用 2016 年费城住房和街区调查数据以及混合效应逻辑回归模型，探讨了绅士化与街区满意度之间的关系，并考察了两者之间的关系如何因绅士化类型、受访者种族和居住时间长短而变化。我们发现，虽然绅士化总体上与街区满意度呈正相关，但其对街区满意度的影响因绅士化类型、受访者种族和居住时间长短而异。具体而言，按绅士化类型考察时，只有适度的绅士化与街区满意度呈正相关。与非绅士化街区相比，拉丁裔居民和非拉丁裔黑人居民对绅士化街区的满意度较低。最后，绅士化与长期居民的街区满意度并没有显著的关联。
gentrification, neighbourhood change, neighbourhood satisfaction, race绅士化、街区变革、街区满意度、种族
https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241263191Temporary temporariness? The (mis)use of tactical urbanism from the ‘open city’ framework
短暂的临时措施？从 “开放城市 ”框架看战术城市主义的（错误）使用
Lina Naoroz Bråten（挪威科技大学）This paper discusses how Tactical Urbanism aligns with the principles of the ‘open city’ framework. The ‘open city’ is often theorised as the urban condition that best welcomes diverse and flexible use of a city’s public spaces. However, the nature of the planning system at its core is to control and predict urban development, thereby effectively reinforcing the principle of a ‘closed city’ with more fixed and rigid forms. One counter-reaction to the ‘closed city’ is the Tactical Urbanism movement, which applies principles of simple, low-cost, and often temporary public space interventions to achieve and accelerate change. Such interventions can create more ‘open’ and inclusive urban environments, enabling diversity and flexibility. However, Tactical Urbanism is applied in multiple forms by different actors with varying intentions and goals. In this paper, I question the role of Tactical Urbanism in congruence with the theoretical framework of the ‘open (and vibrant) city’, drawing attention to how tactical interventions are used to brand new development projects. Doing so, I ask if Tactical Urbanism can be (mis)used merely as ‘temporary temporariness’ to serve top-down planning strategies, resulting in the ‘closed city’.摘要
本文探讨战术城市化如何与“开放城市”框架的原则相一致。理论上，“开放城市”通常被认为是一种最能适应城市公共空间多元化和灵活使用的城市条件。然而，规划制度的核心本质是控制和预测城市发展，从而有效地强化“封闭城市”的原则，形式更加固定、僵化。战术城市化是对抗“封闭城市”的运动，该运动采用简单、低成本且通常是临时的公共空间干预来实现和加速变革。这些干预措施可以创造更加“开放”和包容的城市环境，实现多元化和灵活性。然而，战术城市化被不同的参与者以多种形式应用，具有不同的意图和目标。本文对战术城市化与“开放（和充满活力的）城市”理论框架的一致性提出了质疑，并呼吁关注如何将战术干预应用于全新的开发项目。据此，本文提出质疑，战术城市化是否会仅仅被（误）用作“短暂的临时措施”来服务自上而下的规划策略，从而导致“封闭城市”。
neoliberal development, open city, public space, tactical urbanism, urban design新自由主义发展、开放城市、公共空间、战术城市化、城市设计
https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241263436微信号｜USJ_online
Urban Studies期刊官方微信公众号
