Understanding the multi-source uncertainties effect on the seismic performance assessment of deeply hydraulic tunnels based on the generalized PDEM基于广义概率密度演化方法的深层水工隧道抗震性能评估中多源不确定性影响研究
Sun BB, Deng MJ, Xu J, Xu Y, Cui HB, 2024. Understanding the multi-source uncertainties effect on the seismic performance assessment of deeply hydraulic tunnels based on the generalized PDEM. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 76: 103619.DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103619
摘要 | Abstract
抗震性能评估方法的关键是合理考虑地震动 (seismic ground motion, SGM) 的随机性和材料属性的不确定性。此外,地震波入射角可能受地形和地质因素影响,导致不确定性和随机性。这种入射角的变化可能导致意想不到的结构损伤。然而,目前地下结构的地震设计规范通常假设在地下工程中使用垂直或水平地震输入方法。从不确定性的角度来看,非平稳地震动、地震入射角和材料参数的多源不确定性在水工隧道 (hydraulic tunnel, HT) 抗震性能评估中的应用,仍是当前抗震设计和性能评估的一个挑战。为解决这一挑战,本文引入了广义 F 偏差方法、广义概率密度演化方法 (probability density evolution method, PDEM) 和等价极值事件,进行随机动力学分析,并给出考虑多源不确定性的水工隧道易损性曲线。结果表明,通过多源不确定性得到的水工隧道损伤概率与分析单一不确定性和两类不确定性时存在显著差异。此外,可得出结论,在不同地震强度水平下,相比于单一不确定性和两类不确定性,多源不确定性会导致水工隧道更高的抗震需求。鉴于此,强烈建议在水工隧道抗震设计和性能评估中考虑相关因素,例如入射角、地震波和材料参数的随机性。关键词: 多源不确定性, 随机地震动, 斜入射压缩波, 水工隧道, 概率密度演化方法, 易损性曲线One crucial element of a seismic performance evaluation approach is to appropriately account for the stochastic characteristics of SGMs and the uncertainty associated with material properties. Furthermore, the incidence angle of seismic waves may be influenced by topographic and geological factors, leading to uncertainty and randomness. This variability in incident angles has the potential to cause unforeseen structural damage. However, the current seismic design code of underground structures has commonly assumed the vertical or horizontal seismic input method in underground engineering. From the uncertain point of view, the multi-source uncertainties that incorporate the nonstationary SMGs, seismic input angles, and material parameters utilized to conduct the seismic performance assessment of HTs remain a challenge in current seismic design and performance evaluation. To overcome this challenge, the Generalized F-discrepancy method, the generalized PDEM, and the equivalent extreme-value event are introduced to conduct stochastic dynamic analysis and develop the appropriate fragility curves of HTs considering the multi-source uncertainties. The results demonstrate that the probability of damage of the HT obtained by multi-source uncertainties is significantly different in analyzing the single uncertain and two uncertainties. Moreover, it can be concluded that the multi-source uncertainties can cause more seismic demand than the single uncertain and two uncertainties under different earthquake intensity levels for the HT. In light of this, it is strongly suggested that seismic design and performance assessment of HTs take into account the relevant aspects, such as the input angles, the random features of seismic waves, and the material parameters.Keywords: Multi-source uncertainties; Stochastic ground motions; Oblique P waves; Hydraulic tunnels; Probability density evolution method; Fragility curves创新点 | Highlights
- The multi-source uncertainties are adopted for stochastic dynamic analysis
- The probability density evolution method is used for performance evaluation
- The fragility curves are developed to the deeply hydraulic tunnel
- The difference between the different cases is compared
Fig. 1. Flowchart of the stochastic dynamic analysis and seismic performance assessment
图 2: 样本、目标与蒙特卡罗方法的均值与标准差对比Fig. 2. Comparison of the mean and standard deviation among the samples, target, and MC method
Fig. 3. Incident P waves view at the truncated boundary
图 4: 考虑流体—结构—围岩体相互作用系统的 2 维有限元模型Fig. 4. 2-D FE model considering fluid-structure-surrounding rock mass interaction system
Fig. 5. Comparison of the mean value of the drift ratio of an HT generated by different cases
图 6: 10 s 与 15 s 时三类工况下水工隧道漂移比的概率密度函数Fig. 6. PDF of the drift ratio of an HT for the three cases at 10 s and 15 s
Fig. 7. Peak value of the drift ratio of an HT for the three cases
Fig. 8. Comparison of the probability of damage of an HT under three different cases
图 9: 典型峰值地震动加速度水平下水工隧道的损伤概率对比Fig. 9. Comparison of the probability of damage of an HT at typical PGA levels
作者信息 | Authors
孙奔博 Ben-Bo Sun, 通讯作者 (Corresp.) 郑州大学 (Zhengzhou University) 水利与交通学院Email: sunbenbo@zzu.edu.cn
中国工程院院士
新疆维吾尔自治区科学技术协会 (Xinjiang Association for Science & Technology)
黄河勘测规划设计研究院 (Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd.)
新疆维吾尔自治区科学技术协会 (Xinjiang Association for Science & Technology)
中国电建集团北京勘测设计研究院 (Power China Beijing Engineering Co., Ltd.)
律梦泽 M.Z. Lyu | 编辑 (Ed)
P.D. Spanos | 审校 (Rev)
陈建兵 J.B. Chen | 审校 (Rev)
彭勇波 Y.B. Peng | 审校 (Rev)