Supporters of the idea that manufacturers and shopping malls should sell fewer packaged products argue that these entities have the most control and influence over the amount of packaging used. Manufacturers determine how products are packaged, and by adopting more eco-friendly practices, they can significantly reduce waste at the source. Similarly, shopping malls and retailers have the power to stock and promote products with minimal packaging, encouraging consumers to make more sustainable choices. By reducing packaging, companies not only lessen their environmental impact but also potentially lower production and transportation costs, which could benefit both the planet and consumers.
支持厂商减少销售包装的人认为，这些实体对包装的使用量有最大的控制权和影响力。厂家决定产品的包装方式，通过采用更环保的做法，他们可以从源头上显著减少浪费。同样的道理，经销商能推广包装少的产品，鼓励消费者做出更环保可持续的选择。通过减少包装，公司不仅可以减少对环境的影响，还可以降低生产和运输成本，这对地球和消费者都有好处。
Opponents argue that individual choices play a key role in driving change. They believe that when consumers actively choose products with minimal packaging, they send a clear message to manufacturers and retailers that there is a demand for sustainable options. This demand can pressure companies to adopt eco-friendly practices in order to stay competitive. Furthermore, it is argued that consumers should be conscious of the environmental impact of their purchases and make responsible decisions accordingly. By being more selective and prioritizing products that use less packaging, individuals can contribute to reducing waste and promoting sustainability.
反方认为个人选择在推动变革中发挥着关键作用。他们认为，当消费者主动选择包装最少的产品时，他们向制造商和零售商发出了一个明确的信息，即需要可持续的选择。这种需求会迫使企业采取环保措施，以保持竞争力。此外，有人认为消费者应该意识到他们的购买对环境的影响，并做出负责任的决定。通过更有选择性和优先使用较少包装的产品，个人可以为减少浪费和促进可持续性做出贡献。
