入芝兰之室:企业绿色文化与绿色创新
学术
财经
2025-01-17 09:00
上海
CXX入芝兰之室:企业绿色文化与绿色创新
Entering the Chamber of Orchids: Corporate Green Culture and Green Innovation
《外国经济与管理》2025年47卷第1期 页码:137-152 online:2025年1月20日
中:白福萍1 , 黄宇杰1 , 王京2 , 商梦亭1
英:Bai Fuping1 , Huang Yujie1 , Wang Jing2 , Shang Mengting1
作者单位:1.山东理工大学 管理学院, 山东 淄博 255000; 2.中国海洋大学 管理学院, 山东 青岛 266100
摘要:企业绿色文化如何发挥非正式制度优势,促进生产方式低碳创新与经济可持续协调发展?本文基于企业文化的非正式制度视角,采用综合评价方法有效识别“绿色”导向的企业文化,并选取2011—2021年中国A股上市公司作为研究样本,系统考察了绿色文化对绿色创新绩效的影响及其作用机制。研究结果表明,企业绿色文化是孵化和培育绿色创新的“芝兰之室”,并通过提升资源集聚和强化高管绿色认知分别发挥“资源虹吸”和“战略引导”机制,促进绿色技术创新和绿色管理创新绩效。异质性分析发现,绿色文化对不同特征企业的影响存在着非对称性,主要表现为:高管受教育水平越高、社会责任压力越大、受环境规制约束较低的企业其绿色创新绩效更易受绿色文化影响。本研究丰富了绿色文化理论研究范畴,为推动企业绿色创新实践提供了经验借鉴和启示。
关键词:绿色文化;绿色技术创新;绿色管理创新;资源虹吸;战略引导
Summary: With the rapid global dissemination and development of sustainable development and green investment concepts, a corporate culture guided by “green” has become the guiding force for low-carbon development and green transformation, often likened to the “chamber of orchids”. How corporate green culture leverages informal institutional advantages to promote low-carbon innovation in production and facilitate coordinated sustainable economic development is an underexplored topic in the literature. From the perspective of informal institutions, taking China’s A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2021 as the sample, this paper identifies a “green”-oriented corporate culture based on five dimensions: spirit, strategy, system, production, and consumption, uses the natural language processing technology to extract the green culture information disclosed in the annual reports of listed companies, and examines the impact and mechanism of green culture on green innovation performance. The results indicate that corporate green culture promotes green innovation performance. Further analysis reveals that green culture plays a role in “resource siphoning” and “strategic guidance” mechanisms by enhancing resource aggregation and strengthening executive green awareness, respectively, and promotes the performance of green technology innovation and green management innovation. Heterogeneity analysis finds that enterprises with a higher executive education level, greater social responsibility pressure, and lower environmental regulatory constraints are more susceptible to the impact of green culture on their green innovation performance. The main contributions of this paper are that: (1) It reveals the differences in the impact of green culture on the performance of different types of corporate green innovation, expanding the theoretical factors driving green innovation performance and enriching the research scope of “green”-oriented informal institution theory. (2) It explores in depth the mechanism by which green culture affects corporate green innovation performance through the two channels of “resource siphoning” and “strategic guidance”, revealing the “black box” between the channels of green culture and corporate green innovation performance. (3) Through the external perspectives of social responsibility pressure and environmental regulation, it identifies the boundary role of green culture in the process of affecting corporate green innovation performance, and improves the theoretical extension of external pressure on corporate behavior, expanding the boundary of existing green innovation theory research. (4) Based on the comprehensive evaluation indicators of green culture, it not only provides a more detailed and contextualized understanding of the factors affecting the development of green culture, which improves the effectiveness and reliability of the results, but also provides new ideas for quantitative research on green development.
Key words:green culture; green technology innovation; green management innovation; resource siphoning; strategic guidance
DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20231027.401
收稿日期:2023-05-08
基金项目: 国家社科基金项目(20BGL087);山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2023MG011);山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2022QG028)