这里是
Eva托福学习团
考情分析
第536期
今天推送的是
12月1日·托福·考题分析.
以下思路和范文仅供同学们学习·参考。
转载请注明出处。
11.24日再补报分
之前已经汇报过：
👉四级506分, 托福写作30满分经验来啦!+ 11.24托福出分汇报(2)
今天还有同学来补汇报：
写作28分
恭喜大家，
付出就有回报
👏
综合写作回忆
一个1850年新闻上的在雪上留下的神秘标记
动物，热气球，假新闻
学术写作分析
Dr. Achebe
This week we are talking about how different cities choose to either preserve or replace older, historicbuildings. Some cities have strict rules about preserving older buildings and homes, especially those with historic architecture. Others tend to encourage new construction to replace structures that are aging and decaying. Should cities try to save historic buildings or replace them with more modern ones?
1. 这个题重复了1.23日的家考题目。
因为是小话题，所以老师也整理了语料推送在公众号里，👉托福·学术讨论写作·语料第28期 | 老旧建筑如何处理？
关注老师公众号的同学就很幸运了
2. 这是一个二选一的题目：保护older/historical building 还是 替换成modern ones.
但是题目背景中已经把这2种建筑的优缺点已经给我们暗示出来了。
-- Older buildings and homes， 包括 especially those with historic architecture.
这种建筑就很值得保护：
A. 就很有历史价值，就很值得保护。比如中国的故宫，紫禁城the Forbidden City; 罗马斗兽场：Colosseum…
B. 还可以带来经济收入，因为会吸引数百万人来旅游。
-- Replace structures that are aging and decaying
--题目也提到了有些城市想要替换的是“年老，失修，逐渐衰败”的老建筑。比如中国很多大城市中的城中村，棚户房…
替换成新建筑的好处也很多：
--更安全。老建筑在防火，安全等方面可能做得很不好，
--解决住房短缺。现代的高层建筑可以容纳更多人，解决城市住房短缺问题。
（最近很火的电视剧《小巷人家》其实也触及了这一话题。如果不旧城改造，都还是住平房的话，大量返回城市的人就没有立锥之地。当年返城知青只能挤在厨房过道睡，也很是心酸。）
参考范文 :
Aligning with xx’s view, I advocate for governmental prioritization of these structures due to their economic and cultural value, especially vital during economic downturns. Historic sites offer authentic experiences that attract tourists worldwide, significantly boosting local economies. Take, for example, the Forbidden City in Beijing. This expansive and intricately designed site captures the essence of China’s rich history, drawing millions annually and supporting various local businesses, from hotels to transportation services.
While the notion of replacing old structures with modern buildings like skyscraper apartments might seem a practical solution to urban housing shortages, this approach overlooks viable alternatives such as suburban development. Additionally, demolishing historical buildings involves substantial financial and cultural costs that could otherwise be avoided.
In conclusion, it is more prudent for cities to conserve their architectural heritage. Preserving historical buildings not only safeguards cultural identity but also ensures continued economic benefits through tourism, outweighing the advantages of newer constructions.
本周考试口语分析，请关注公众号：Heather托福学习团
最近
