Stacy Horn: From the Start, I Made an Effort to Get Women Online

文摘   科技   2024-11-02 19:00   北京  

In the vast universe of cyberspace, there is no place quite like Echo. Founded by Stacy Horn, Echo emerged from her early experiences in the 1980s when she first encountered online communication through bulletin board systems and pioneering platforms like The WELL. Stacy’s vision for Echo was to create a welcoming space that would encourage participation from a diverse range of voices, particularly women, who were often ignored in online discussions. 


Echo, which stands for East Coast Hang Out, is a community with an East Coast feel - direct, often witty, and engaged with the arts and media - setting it apart from other online spaces. Members here don’t just connect virtually; they come together in person, forming genuine bonds and bringing the online community to life through face-to-face meetups. 















 Stacy Horn


Over its remarkable 35-year journey, Echo has encountered numerous challenges, with many users coming and going. However, thanks to Stacy’s unwavering dedication and love for the community, Echo is still here for people to connect with old friends.

Today, we are thrilled to speak with Stacy Horn, who has been a pioneering force in the development of online communities. Our conversation delves into the influences that led her to found Echo, the technical challenges she faced, and the unique culture that developed within the community. We also discuss the experiences of women online in the early days and how those dynamics have evolved over the years. Finally, Stacy shares the most valuable lessons she has learned while running Echo and her deep love for the community.


A Singular Place












▮ The Nexus:  Before founding Echo, which online communities were you involved in? How did those experiences influence your decision to create Echo? 

▮ The Nexus: Before founding Echo, which online communities were you involved in? How did those experiences influence your decision to create Echo? 

Stacy Horn: My earliest introduction to online community was in 1982. I was working in telecommunications and a co-worker grabbed me and said, “You have to see this.” It was a BBS filled with teenage boys who were endearing in a “Big Bang Theory” way. I was transfixed by what I was seeing. I started interacting with them and quickly realized, they think I’m a guy! They didn’t believe I was female, but once I convinced them, they were like a pack of excited puppies.

A few years later, in 1986, I entered the Interactive Telecommunications Program (ITP) at NYU. Everyone had to call an online community in California called The WELL and try it out. It’s hard to communicate how mind-blowing that experience was at the time.  

But in the 1980s, few people were online to begin with, and like that BBS I mentioned, it was mostly guys having mostly technical discussions. On The WELL there were all these smart, funny people, talking about a wide variety of subjects and ideas - there was just nothing like it.


It saddens me to think how the larger social networks today cannot touch places like The WELL for intelligent conversation, humor, and warmth (and Echo!). It’s not that the people in these other networks are not capable of what I’m talking about; they are not congregating in places that inspire and encourage it.


On a side note, thank you Ward Christensen, co-inventor of the bulletin board system that inspired me and many others. He just died and I feel terrible that I never thanked him or his co-inventor, Randy Suess.


▮ The Nexus: What technical features of Echo encouraged people to engage more actively in conversations and interactions? What were the major technical obstacles you faced when starting Echo?
Stacy Horn: Echo ran, and still runs on the software that was available at the time, and it’s text-based. You have to learn commands and you can’t do anything without typing in a command. Everything about it was an obstacle to communication really.

To get around this, I called everyone who tried Echo and asked them how it was going and offered to help. I held classes in my West Village apartment called “Echo School.” And very early on I started holding face to face gatherings. The original reason for this was based on my experience on The WELL. One frustrating thing for me was I couldn’t meet the people I was getting to know in-person. Not easily, anyway. Most of them were in California and elsewhere. This led me to position Echo as a mostly local service, so people could meet in person if they chose. People outside New York City were welcomed and wanted, but I didn’t do much outreach outside New York.  


Fueling this decision was the fact that one of the many things I loved about The WELL was the West Coast flavor. What fun is it to go some place if it feels exactly like the place you just left? I wanted Echo to have an East Coast feel. I wanted people to feel like they were visiting or hanging out in New York City.


The face to face gatherings turned out to help Echo in a number of ways. It contributed to people feeling more bonded to Echo and that gave them the patience to hang in there and get past the various technical difficulties.


And the technical obstacles were enormous. I couldn’t find investors at the time and had to do a lot myself. I had to learn Unix, etc. Thank god for the people who came along to try Echo and ended up helping me and helping Echo survive and grow. The only skill I had was a background in telecommunications and my experience battling phone companies. In the early days, online communities were accessed by phone lines, and I knew how to get the phone companies to provide quality lines.


▮ The Nexus: What were the key differences between Echo’s culture and that of other online communities? If someone new from another platform joined Echo, what kind of “culture shock” might they experience?
Stacy Horn: Aside from the New York style of communication, it was the things we chose to talk about. The East Coast was culturally different from the West Coast - we were, and still are, very arts and media oriented, for instance. Our sense of humor was different. But the biggest shock was probably the presence of women. From the start, I made an effort to get women online. I wanted Echo to have as many women there as men.
▮ The Nexus: How do you think in-person meetings positively influenced online interactions? 
Stacy Horn: My original intention for having face to face gatherings was to satisfy my desire to meet the people I was getting to know. I figured I wouldn’t be the only person to want that! It soon became apparent that those who came to the face to face events became the most dedicated members of the community. Getting together in person helped cement a sense of community.

I also discovered that it was one of the most effective tools I had to manage conflict. One of the very first lessons I learned on Echo - though this is going to sound quaint now - is that people are pretty much the same online as they are in person. It’s one thing to act a certain way for a while, but for most people it’s hard to keep that up over time. Eventually people get to know who you really are.


So you put a group of people together, and in addition to all the great things that happen between people, bad things happen as well. People fight; people say ugly things. When conflicts flared, I was expected to do something about it. This was not fun. I didn’t feel up to it. I didn’t have any particular skills or talent for it, and I had no experience. I agonized over every decision, trying to do the right thing. 


But I did discover that it was easier to settle a dispute in person than it was online, so I would try to get everyone involved in whatever conflict I was trying to settle to go to the next face to face event planned. This didn’t always work, but it did most of the time.


▮ The Nexus: What role did conference hosts play in shaping the culture and discussions on Echo? How did you select them?
Stacy Horn:  I know this may sound like lip service, but the hosts and users of Echo made Echo. Not me. Anything good people say about Echo is because of them, and I lucked out when they all showed up. When someone appeared who had a way with words and people, who were good at neutralizing conflict, I asked them to be a host. They settled disputes if they could, welcomed new users, and kept conversation flowing and lively. 


Women Online















 The Nexus: As a woman joining male-dominated online communities in the early days of the internet, what kind of impact or challenges did you encounter?  
Stacy Horn: This is a very hard question to answer. We live in a sexist society that was so much worse back then, and still worse every decade you go back. I was routinely dismissed. Something I said would be ignored, and then when a man said the exact same thing, it would be praised. Every move I made was affected by that culture. But I also benefited from it. The online community was very new, and newspapers and magazines were showing an increased interest in covering it. My presence was even more novel. A girl running a computer network! I got a ton of media attention that I don’t believe I would have gotten otherwise.
▮ The Nexus: Echo was known for attracting a higher percentage of women than many other platforms at the time. What efforts did you make to encourage more women to join Echo? What impact did these efforts have on the community?
Stacy Horn: I’ve already started to answer this question. But in the first couple of years of Echo, women got their first year free. I’m sure the men on Echo were not thrilled about that, but when I started Echo, it was estimated that most online services were 10% female. Echo quickly grew to 40% female. Everyone, male and female, appreciated that. I was successful at getting women online because I was pretty much the only one trying. It also helped that I was female. When I went around to women’s groups, like WAC, the Women’s Action Coalition, and asked if I could address the group to talk about cyberspace and Echo, they said yes and they listened. 

I also made sure that half the hosts were women. Hosts set the tone and half the hosts on Echo were women. When women got online, they saw women in charge everywhere. Women had a voice on Echo.


Finally, we created a number of private conferences to give different groups safe spaces to talk, and one of them was a conference for women only. 


▮ The Nexus: While running Echo, did you ever witness anyone facing serious threats or harassment? What policies did you establish to ensure women were protected from such behavior?
Stacy Horn: I saw harassment. There were guys who wouldn’t leave someone alone even after she made it clear she wanted nothing to do with them. So I made harassment grounds for getting kicked off Echo. If someone says “leave me alone,” you have to.

Here is how it is worded:


Harassment of any kind will not be tolerated. Concerning email and YO’s specifically [YOs are real-time messages that you can send to someone and they pop up on their screen when they are logged into Echo]:  “While abuse, harassment, and even bigotry are hard to define, there’s one good rule of thumb:  if a message recipient complains, stop.”  (From The Whole Internet User’s Guide and Catalog.)


The way it works is, if someone is bothering, you ask them to stop. If they don’t, tell the host. If it continues, tell me.  


▮ The Nexus: What are your thoughts on the current state of women’s participation in online spaces? Have things improved or become more challenging over the years?
Stacy Horn: Some things have improved, but there will always be a percentage of people who will never learn. What has made it more challenging, not just for women, but for everyone, is the numbers. There are so, so many people behaving badly, and through the wonders of the internet, these people find each other, encourage each other, and amplify the worst in themselves.  

Echo was always a smaller community and now even smaller, so I don’t have direct experience managing a community as large as places like Twitter (can’t call it X) or Facebook. Twitter made a good start when they made a good faith effort to curb misinformation for instance, but the current owner, unfortunately, is one of those people I just mentioned who amplifies the worst of humanity.  Facebook used to post warnings about posts that may contain misinformation, but I haven’t seen that in a long time.


The example I gave, misinformation, is just half of the problem. The first half is the fact that it spreads far and wide quickly. We can do something about that. The second half is the number of people who embrace it without questioning or researching the facts. I don’t know what to do about that.



Past and Future














▮ The Nexus: What were some of the most valuable lessons you learned about community building after managing Echo for so many years?
Stacy Horn:  A while back I was asked what I would do about the problems we are facing online these days. The only thing I could offer was decreasing anonymity. People hide behind it and say things they wouldn’t normally say. But now there are many more people than I would have ever believed who have no problem saying the awful things they say and letting everyone know exactly who said it. They are not only unashamed, they are proud. 

So I would also add getting people together in person. This was easy for me, dealing with a relatively small number of people who mostly lived within a few miles of each other. But it’s not impossible to manage large groups. It would take more work and more money, but it is absolutely possible.


We also need many more people moderating discussions.


▮ The Nexus: Echo is one of the few early online communities that still exists today. Over such a long period, what do you think has kept you committed to running Echo? Was there ever a moment when you thought about selling or shutting it down?
Stacy Horn: I thought very briefly recently about shutting Echo down, when dealing with an online dispute. I just felt like I’d had enough. But the thought of not having Echo to log into broke my heart. For a long time, while running Echo, I didn’t get very personally involved with the community. I participated, but with walls up. It was hard to do the things I had to do, especially managing conflict, except from a distance.

At a certain point, I started writing more, and promoting Echo less. It was something I’d wanted to do since I was nine-years old: write books. Eventually I wasn’t trying to grow Echo at all, and at that point I started letting the walls down. Now I feel like any other user, which perhaps made managing that recent conflict so hard for me.


▮ The Nexus: With the rapid advancement of technology, how do you think online communities will evolve? In your view, what role could AI play in moderating and reducing harmful behaviors within online spaces?
Stacy Horn: When I started Echo, I was so excited about it, and while I never lost that excitement, I was taken thoroughly by surprise about how ugly people could be and that I somehow had to deal with that in some way. Of course I should have seen it coming, but I was naive. It was very trying and difficult to find ways to manage that in ways that caused the least possible harm to anyone.

Cyberville: Clicks, Culture, and the Creation of an Online Town


So when I was asked to write a book about “cyberspace”, I thought it would be more interesting to write about the reality of it, that it was not the utopia many people thought it would be. I used real examples although I did not use real names, except in one case where I thought the person would want me to, and he later verified that he was glad I used his name. I thought it was important to show that people not only behaved just as badly online as they would anywhere else, but that some people behaved even worse, and it was something that needed to be addressed and discussed.


Looking back, I wish I had rung that bell even louder.


AI might help moderate bad behavior, but here’s the problem I see with that. There are some who seem to view those who disagree with them, especially when it comes to politics, as being somehow less than human, and undeserving of common decency. They are incapable or unwilling to consider the feelings of people who are different. Introducing an element that actually isn’t human might add a layer of unreality that would only exacerbate the problem. However, it might be useful as a tool used to search out and find bad behavior and misinformation that an actual person may respond to.




The Nexus


The interview questions are reviewed by Ron Frederick; the interview article is edited by Alex Li.

The Nexus
Connect it.