周一“星”视角|纵隔淋巴结清扫术在外周型临床IA期非小细胞肺癌肺段切除术中的应用;肺浸润性黏液腺癌与非黏液腺癌的预后比较

学术   科学   2024-09-23 20:20   四川  



本期胸小星将为大家带来纵隔淋巴结清扫术在外周型临床IA期非小细胞肺癌肺段切除术中的应用;肺浸润性黏液腺癌与非黏液腺癌的预后比较,一起来看看吧!


2017·EATTS 

01

Mediastinal lymph node dissection in segmentectomy for peripheral c-stage IA (≤2 cm) non-small-cell lung cancer

Hiroyuki Adachi1Hiroyuki Ito2,Takuya Nagashima2,Tetsuya Isaka2Kotaro Murakami2Shunsuke Shigefuku2Noritake Kikunishi2Naoko Shigeta2Yujin Kudo3Yoshihiro Miyata4Morihito Okada4Norihiko Ikeda3

1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.

2 Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.

3 Department of Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

4 Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.


Background:

The necessity of mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) in segmentectomy remains uncertain as recent trials on intentional segmentectomy have made MLND mandatory. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the necessity of MLND in segmentectomy for patients with peripheral stage IA (≤2 cm) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).


Methods:

Of the 5,222 surgical cases for NSCLC from three institutions between 2010 and 2021, 1,457 patients met the JCOG0802 trial eligibility criteria. Initially, we analyzed 574 patients who underwent lobectomy with MLND to identify preoperative risk factors for cN0-pN2 occurrence (Cohort 1). Subsequently, we evaluated the relationship between these factors and the cumulative postoperative recurrence in 390 patients who underwent segmentectomy (Cohort 2).


Results:

In Cohort 1, risk factors for cN0-pN2 occurrence were consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) =1.0 and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ≥2.0. When classifying patients into three groups (Group A without any factors, Group B with either factor, and Group C with both factors), the cN0-pN2 occurrence was significantly higher in Group C than in the other groups (0.9%, 3.4%, and 8.4%, respectively, P =0.005). When classifying patients in Cohort 2 using the classification identified in Cohort 1 (117, 131, and 142 were categorized into Group A, Group B, and Group C, respectively), the 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence rate was significantly higher in Group C than in others (2.0%, 2.0%, and 15.9%, respectively, P <0.001).


Conclusions:

MLND is unlikely to be beneficial in intentional segmentectomy for patients with tumors showing CTR < 1.0 and SUVmax < 2.0.


[CITATION]:Adachi H, Ito H, Nagashima T, et al. Mediastinal lymph node dissection in segmentectomy for peripheral c-stage IA (≤2 cm) non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep 9:S0022-5223(24)00786-4.

[DOI]:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.003.

[IF]: 4.9

向下滑动查看所有内容 


纵隔淋巴结清扫术在外周型临床IA期(≤2 厘米)非小细胞肺癌肺段切除术中的应用

胸“星”外科学术团队成员 刘静 

背景

由于近期的意向性肺段切除试验已将纵隔淋巴结清扫 (mediastinal lymph node dissection, MLND) 列为强制性要求,因此MLND在肺段切除术中的必要性仍不确定。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估外周IA期(≤2厘米)非小细胞肺癌(Non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)患者在肺段切除术中进行纵隔淋巴结清扫的必要性。

方法

2010年至2021年期间,三家机构共收治了5222例NSCLC手术病例,其中1457例患者符合JCOG0802试验的入选标准。首先,我们分析了 574 例接受肺叶切除术并伴有 MLND 的患者,以确定 cN0-pN2 发生的术前风险因素(队列 1)。随后,我们评估了390 例接受肺段切除术的患者中这些因素与术后累积复发率之间的关系(队列 2)。

结果

在队列 1 中,发生 cN0-pN2 的风险因素是实变肿瘤比(CTR)=1.0 和最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)≥2.0。将患者分为三组(不含任何因素的 A 组、含任一因素的 B 组和含两种因素的 C 组)时,C 组的 cN0-pN2 发生率显著高于其他组(分别为 0.9%,3.4% 和 8.4%,P =0.005)。当使用队列 1 中确定的分类方法对队列 2 中的患者进行分类时(分别有 117、131 和 142 人被分为 A 组、B 组和 C 组),C 组的 5 年累积复发率显著高于其他组(分别为 2.0%,2.0% 和 15.9%,P <0.001)。

结论

对于CTR<1.0和SUVmax<2.0的肿瘤患者,在意向的肺段切除术中进行纵隔淋巴结清扫可能无益处。

Table 2. Logistic regression analyses concerning cN0-pN2 occurrence in Cohort 1


Figure 2.The curves of cumulative incidence of recurrence of each group in Cohort 2. Group A: Patients whose primary tumor showed CTR < 1.0 and SUVmax < 2.0. Group B: Patients whose primary tumor showed CTR = 1.0 or SUVmax ≥ 2.0. Group C: Patients whose primary tumor showed CTR = 1.0 and SUVmax ≥ 2.0.

2017·EATTS 

02

Surgical prognosis of lung invasive mucinous and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma: propensity score matched analysis

Jun Oh Lee1, Geun Dong Lee1 , Sehoon Choi1 Hyeong Ryul Kim1, Yong-Hee Kim1 , Dong Kwan Kim1, Seung-Il Park1, Jae Kwang Yun1

1 Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.


Objectives: 

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma exhibits distinct prognostic outcomes compared to non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (ADC). This study investigated and compared the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of invasive mucinous and non-mucinous ADC patients.


Methods: 

This retrospective study included patients who underwent curative surgery for ADC between 2011 and 2021. Patient characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching. Cumulative incidence was analysed to evaluate cancer recurrence incidence, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS) for each group.


Results: 

A total of 6101 patients were included. After matching, the non-mucinous group and mucinous groups comprised 798 and 408 patients, respectively. The patients in the mucinous group had a lower recurrence incidence than those in the non-mucinous group (P = 0.014). The recurrence incidence in the mucinous group was between those of grades 1 (P = 0.011) and 2 (P = 0.012) and the OS rates were comparable to those of grades 2 (P = 0.6) and 3 (P = 0.2). Multivariable analysis revealed that the maximal standardized uptake value [hazard ratio (HR): 1.13, P = 0.11] and progressed pathological stages (pStage II, HR: 3.9, P = 0.028; pStage III, HR: 8.33, P = 0.038) served as adverse prognostic factors for the mucinous group.


Conclusions: 

Patients with mucinous ADC demonstrated lower recurrence incidence and similar OS rates compared to those with non-mucinous ADC. The recurrence incidence of mucinous ADC was between those of International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer grades 1 and 2, with the OS rates comparable to those of grades 2 and 3.


[CITATION]: Lee JO, Lee GD, Choi S, et al. Surgical prognosis of lung invasive mucinous and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma: propensity score matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Sep 2;66(3):ezae316.

[DOI]: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae316. 

[IF]: 3.1

向下滑动查看所有内容


肺浸润性黏液腺癌与非黏液腺癌的预后:倾向性评分匹配

胸“星”外科学术团队成员 刘宋杰 译


目的

浸润性黏液腺癌与非黏液腺癌的预后结局不同。本研究旨在探究并比较浸润性黏液腺癌和非黏液腺癌患者的临床结局和预后因素。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了2011年至2021年间接受根治性手术治疗的腺癌患者。通过倾向性评分匹配来平衡患者特征。使用累积发病率分析评估癌症复发率,并采用Kaplan-Meier方法计算各组的总生存期。

结果

本研究共纳入6101名患者。匹配后,非黏液组和黏液组分别为798名和408名患者。黏液组患者的复发率低于非黏液组(P = 0.014)。黏液组的复发率介于国际肺癌研究协会(International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, IASLC) 分级1级(P = 0.011)和2级(P = 0.012)之间,总体生存率与2级(P = 0.6)和3级(P = 0.2)相当。多因素分析显示,最大标准化摄取值[风险比(Hazard Ratio, HR):1.13,P = 0.11]和病理分期(pII期,HR:3.9,P= 0.028; pIII期,HR:8.33,P = 0.038)是黏液组的不良预后因素。

结论

与非黏液腺癌患者相比,黏液腺癌患者的复发率较低,而总生存率相似。黏液腺癌患者的复发率介于IASLC 1级和2级之间,总生存率与2级和3级相当。

Figure 2. Cumulative incidence of recurrence curves and Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves of patients after propensity score matching. 

Figure 3. Cumulative incidence of recurrence curves and overall survival of patients with stage I IMA and INMA.

2017·EATTS 



胸外学术时间
胸外学术时间系胸“星”外科学术团队(EATTS)下特色平台,主要共享胸外科领域最前沿的医学论文及科普。此外还分享医学论文写作的基本技能,旨在为医学专业人士(尤其是胸外专业)或大众提供网络共享平台,让大家一起 EAT 每份胸外盛宴。
 最新文章