周一“星”视角|围手术期使用纳武利尤单抗治疗可切除肺癌的价值;非小细胞肺癌患者治疗前情绪压力与免疫检查点抑制剂反应的关系

学术   科学   2024-05-27 20:22   四川  



  本期胸小星将为大家带来围手术期使用纳武利尤单抗治疗可切除肺癌的价值;非小细胞肺癌患者治疗前情绪压力与免疫检查点抑制剂反应的关系,一起来看看吧!

2017·EATTS 

01

Perioperative Nivolumab in Resectable Lung Cancer

Tina Cascone1, Mark M Awad1, Jonathan D Spicer1, Jie He1, Shun Lu1, Boris Sepesi1, Fumihiro Tanaka1, Janis M Taube1, Robin Cornelissen1, Libor Havel1, Nina Karaseva1, Jaroslaw Kuzdzal1, Lubos B Petruzelka1, Lin Wu 1, Jean-Louis Pujol1, Hiroyuki Ito1, Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu1, Ludmila de Oliveira Muniz Koch1, Annelies Janssens1, Aurelia Alexandru1, Sabine Bohnet1, Fedor V Moiseyenko1, Yang Gao1, Yasutaka Watanabe1, Cinthya Coronado Erdmann1, Padma Sathyanarayana1, Stephanie Meadows-Shropshire1, Steven I Blum1, Mariano Provencio Pulla1; CheckMate 77T Investigators

1 From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (T.C., B.S.); Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (M.M.A.); McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (J.D.S.); the National Cancer Center-National Clinical Research Center for Cancer-Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (J.H.), Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai (S.L.), and Hunan Cancer Hospital (L.W.) and Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (Y.G.), Changsha - all in China; the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu (F.T.), Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama (H.I.), and Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama (Y.W.) - all in Japan; Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore (J.M.T.); Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (R.C.); Thomayer Hospital (L.H.) and Charles University (L.B.P.) - both in Prague, Czech Republic; St. Petersburg State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Clinical Oncology Dispensary (N.K.), and St. Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care (F.V.M.) - both in St. Petersburg, Russia; Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland (J.K.); Montpellier Regional University Hospital, Montpellier, France (J.-L.P.); Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta and Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca (T.-E.C.), and Institutul Oncologic București Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu, Bucharest (A.A.) - both in Romania; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (L.O.M.K.); Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium (A.J.); Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany (S.B.); Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (C.C.E., P.S., S.M.-S., S.I.B.); and Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid (M.P.P.).


Background: 

Standard treatment with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves outcomes in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Perioperative treatment (i.e., neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy) with nivolumab may further improve clinical outcomes.


Methods: 

In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned adults with resectable stage IIA to IIIB NSCLC to receive neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus placebo every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant nivolumab or placebo every 4 weeks for 1 year. The primary outcome was event-free survival according to blinded independent review. Secondary outcomes were pathological complete response and major pathological response according to blinded independent review, overall survival, and safety.


Results: 

At this prespecified interim analysis (median follow-up, 25.4 months), the percentage of patients with 18-month event-free survival was 70.2% in the nivolumab group and 50.0% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or recurrence, abandoned surgery, or death, 0.58; 97.36% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.81; P < 0.001 A pathological complete response occurred in 25.3% of the patients in the nivolumab group and in 4.7% of those in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 6.64; 95% CI, 3.40 to 12.97); a major pathological response occurred in 35.4% and 12.1%, respectively (odds ratio, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.48 to 6.49). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 32.5% of the patients in the nivolumab group and in 25.2% of those in the chemotherapy group.


Conclusion:

Perioperative treatment with nivolumab resulted in significantly longer event-free survival than chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. No new safety signals were observed.


[CITATION]: Cascone T, Awad MM, Spicer JD, et al. Perioperative Nivolumab in Resectable Lung Cancer, N Engl J Med. 2024 May 16;390(19):1756-1769.

[DOI]: 10.1056/NEJMoa2311926

[IF]:158.5

向下滑动查看所有内容 


围手术期使用纳武利尤单抗治疗可切除肺癌的价值

胸“星”外科学术团队兴趣小队成员 龚静怡 

背景

新辅助纳武利尤单抗联合化疗这一标准治疗方案显著改善了可切除非小细胞肺癌(non-small-cell lung cancer, NSCLC)患者的结局。在围手术期(新辅助治疗后进行手术及辅助治疗)使用纳武利尤单抗治疗可能进一步改善临床结局。

方法

在本项3期随机双盲试验中,研究将可切除IIA-IIIB期NSCLC成年患者分为两组:一组接受新辅助纳武利尤单抗联合化疗,另一组接受新辅助化疗联合安慰剂治疗,每3周1次,共4个周期,随后进行手术,并在术后每4周进行1次辅助纳武利尤单抗或安慰剂治疗,为期一年。主要结局是根据盲法独立审查确定的无事件生存。次要结局是根据盲法独立审查确定的病理完全缓解和主要病理缓解、总体生存和安全性。

结果

在本次预先设定的中期分析中(中位随访时间,25.4个月),纳武利尤单抗组的18个月无事件生存率为70.2%,化疗组为50.0%(疾病进展或复发、放弃手术或死亡的风险比,0.58;97.36%置信区间[CI],0.42-0.81,P < 0.001)。纳武利尤单抗组和化疗组的病理完全缓解率分别为25.3%和4.7%(比值比,6.64;95%CI:3.40-12.97),主要病理缓解率分别为35.4%和12.1%(比值比,4.01;95%CI:2.48-6.49)。纳武利尤单抗组和化疗组3级或4级治疗相关不良事件的发生率分别为32.5%和25.2%。

结论

在可切除NSCLC患者中,与化疗相比,围手术期使用纳武利尤单抗治疗可显著延长无事件生存。未观察到新的安全信号。

Figure 1. Event-free Survival. Shown is event-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review in the intention-to-treat population (Panel A) and in patient subgroups (Panel B).

Figure 2. Pathological Response as Assessed by Central Review. Shown is the pathological complete response in the intention-to-treat population (Panel A), the major pathological response in the intention-to-treat population (Panel B), and the pathological complete response in prespecified patient subgroups (Panel C).

2017·EATTS 

02

Association between pretreatment emotional distress and immune checkpoint inhibitor response in non-small-cell lung cancer

Yue Zeng1 2, Chun-Hong Hu1 3, Yi-Zheng Li1 4, Jian-Song Zhou2, Shu-Xing Wang1 5, Meng-Dong Liu6, Zhen-Hua Qiu1, Chao Deng1, Fang Ma1, Chun-Fang Xia1, Fei Liang7, Yu-Rong Peng1, Ao-Xi Liang1, Sheng-Hao Shi1, Shi-Jiao Yao1, Jun-Qi Liu1, Wen-Jie Xiao1 5, Xiao-Qiao Lin1 5, Xin-Yu Tian1 5, Ying-Zhe Zhang1, Zhuo-Ying Tian1, Ji-An Zou1 5, Yun-Shu Li1 5, Chao-Yue Xiao1, Tian Xu1, Xiao-Jie Zhang2, Xiao-Ping Wang2, Xian-Ling Liu1, Fang Wu1 2 3 8 9 10

1 Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

2 National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, and National Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.

3 Hunan Cancer Mega-Data Intelligent Application and Engineering Research Centre, Changsha, China.

4 Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

5 Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.

6 Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

7 Department of Biostatistics, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

8 Hunan Key Laboratory of Tumor Models and Individualized Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

9 Hunan Key Laboratory of Early Diagnosis and Precision Therapy in Lung Cancer, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

10 FuRong Laboratory, Changsha, China.


Background: 

Emotional distress (ED), commonly characterized by symptoms of depression and/or anxiety, is prevalent in patients with cancer. Preclinical studies suggest that ED can impair antitumor immune responses, but few clinical studies have explored its relationship with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Here we report results from cohort 1 of the prospective observational STRESS-LUNG study, which investigated the association between ED and clinical efficacy of first-line treatment of ICIs in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.


Methods: 

ED was assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale.


Results: 

The study included 227 patients with 111 (48.9%) exhibiting ED who presented depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥5) and/or anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item score ≥5) symptoms at baseline. On the primary endpoint analysis, patients with baseline ED exhibited a significantly shorter median progression-free survival compared with those without ED (7.9 months versus 15.5 months, hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.23 to 2.43, P = 0.002).On the secondary endpoint analysis, ED was associated with lower objective response rate (46.8% versus 62.1%, odds ratio 0.54, P = 0.022), reduced 2-year overall survival rate of 46.5% versus 64.9% (hazard ratio for death 1.82, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 2.97, P = 0.016) and detriments in quality of life. The exploratory analysis indicated that the ED group showed elevated blood cortisol levels, which was associated with adverse survival outcomes.


Conclusion: 

This study suggests that there is an association between ED and worse clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with ICIs, highlighting the potential significance of addressing ED in cancer management.


[CITATION]: Zeng Y, Hu C. H, Li Y. Z, et al. Association between pretreatment emotional distress and immune checkpoint inhibitor response in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Med 2024.

[DOI]: 10.1038/s41591-024-02929-4.

[IF]:82.9

向下滑动查看所有内容


非小细胞肺癌患者治疗前情绪压力与免疫检查点抑制剂反应的关系

胸“星”外科学术团队兴趣小队成员 邓婷 译


背景

情绪压力(Emotional distress, ED),通常以抑郁和(或)焦虑的症状为特征,在癌症患者中普遍存在。临床前研究表明,ED可损害抗肿瘤免疫应答,但其与免疫检查点抑制剂(Immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICIs)应答的相关临床研究较少。本研究是一项前瞻性观察性研究(STRESS-LUNG-1),探究了晚期非小细胞肺癌(Non-small-cell lung cancer, NSCLC)患者的ED与接受ICIs一线治疗的临床疗效间的关系。

方法

本研究采用患者健康问卷-9(patient health questionnaire-9, PHQ-9)和广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7(Generalized Anxiety Disorder, GAD-7)对ED进行评估。

结果

本研究共纳入227例ED患者,其中111例(48.9%)在基线时出现抑郁(PHQ-9评分≥5)和(或)焦虑(GAD-7评分≥5)症状。主要终点分析显示,基线ED患者的中位无进展生存期明显短于无ED患者(7.9个月vs. 15.5个月,HR=1.73, 95%CI: 1.23 ~ 2.43, P = 0.002)。次要终点分析显示,ED与较低的客观缓解率(46.8% vs.62.1%,OR=0.54, = 0.022)、2年总生存率的降低(46.5% vs.64.9%, HR=1.82, 95%CI: 1.12 ~ 2.97, P = 0.016)以及生活质量损害相关。探索性分析表明,ED组血液皮质醇水平升高,这与不良的生存结局有关。

结论

本研究表明,在接受ICIs治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中,ED与较差的临床结局存在关联,强调了在癌症治疗中解决ED的潜在意义。

Table 2. Associations between ED and clinical efficacy of ICI


Figure 4. Survival analyses by Time 2 ED

2017·EATTS 



胸外学术时间
胸外学术时间系胸“星”外科学术团队(EATTS)下特色平台,主要共享胸外科领域最前沿的医学论文及科普。此外还分享医学论文写作的基本技能,旨在为医学专业人士(尤其是胸外专业)或大众提供网络共享平台,让大家一起 EAT 每份胸外盛宴。
 最新文章