术语|关于FAA体系下LLP和Hard-Time的一些定义

职场   2025-01-26 15:23   四川  
Photo by Dionyee with Midjourney
这两天看到一些关于LLP和Hard-Time的讨论,虽然之前也写过一些,但受到讨论的启发,基于FAA相关资料,尝试再深挖一下。

Hard-Time的正式定义是什么时候出现的?

从现有能找到的资料,猜测其出现的时间应该在1970到1978年之间。1978年3月27日颁发的AC 120-17A中有了明确的Hard-Time定义[1]

FAA AC 120-17A中提到的方法就是被称为MSG-2的方法。另一个材料同样来自1978年(但实际正文成文时间应该在1972到1978年之间,因为有提到相关年份的资料),即:United Airlines联合US DOC发布的Reliability-Centered Maintenance[2],其中完整介绍了RCM的诞生、MSG-1的应用和MSG-2的诞生。另外,其引用的材料提到1970年3月25日(下文Marcy怀疑为错误,应为“March”)ATA已经发布了MSG-2方法,可能其中已经包含了Hard Time的定义,只是暂时原文未找到,无法验证。

我们详细看下1978年Reliability-Centered Maintenance中提到Hard-Time的内容:

——正文·87页

——附录·480页

这里看到两处描述不一致,可能与文章相关章节成文时间不同、缺乏审核有关,这种问题在FAA其他跨度大的文件中或文件之间也有发现。
在1978年的Reliability-Centered Maintenance正文中,还找到与今天想讨论的Life Limited Part 有关的名词:Life Limit。可以看到当时的Life Limit是属于Hard-Time process的一种

——正文·87页

我们再来看LLP。在1978年Reliability-Centered Maintenance正文中,也能找到一些源头,那时候还区分为Safe-life limits和Economic-life limits.

——正文·80页

而现行有效的FAA AC中,能找到的Life-limited part定义均指向在指定期限内“更换”,且不包含“翻修”(FAA Order 8110.42D CHG 1例外)。LLP的定义中也抛弃了1978年文件中提到的对“经济性”的考虑,而是强调了“安全”和“强制”。

Life-limited part means any part for which a mandatory replacement limit is specified in the type design, the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness, or the maintenance manual.

——14 CFR 43.10 Disposition of life-limited aircraft parts

By a procedure approved by the FAA, operating limitations must be established which specify the maximum allowable number of flight cycles for each engine life-limited part. Engine life-limited parts are rotor and major static structural parts whose primary failure is likely to result in a hazardous engine effect. Typically, engine life-limited parts include, but are not limited to disks, spacers, hubs, shafts, high-pressure casings, and non-redundant mount components.

——14 CFR 33.70 Engine life-limited parts
Life-limited Part is an article with an established replacement time, inspection interval, or related procedure in the airworthiness limitations section as required by 14 CFR 21.50, 23.1529, 25.1529, 27.1529, 29.1529, 31.82, 33.4, and 35.4. Early type certificate data sheet (TCDS) have mandatory replacements or inspections for some products. These products were certified before 14 CFR had the above airworthiness requirements. 
——FAA Order 8110.42D CHG 1, Part Manufacturer Approval Procedures
LLPs are considered parts that have time limited usage restrictions in terms of flight cycles (and rarely flight hours or calendar times).

——IATA Guidance Material and Best Practices for Life-Limited Parts (LLPs) Traceability

无论是1978年的RCM,还是某发动机厂家现行有效的维修指南,均可以看出Hard-Time和LLP之间是有联系的。

Hard Time: Hard time limits,such as Life Limited Parts (LLPs), which are controlled through Chapter 05-11/12-XX in the LEAP 1AEngine Manual. Chapter 05-11/12/21-XX the "Airworthiness Limitation" section for life limited parts requires the adoption of an Airworthiness Directive (AD) to mandate the change.

——LEAP Maintenance Guide
那么他们之间的差异是什么呢?
猜测两者早期都来自Airline Maintenance Program Development流程,只是后来分道扬镳。Hard-Time的概念在飞机整机层面,被MSG-3逻辑替代,而LLP的要求是在型号合格证(Type Certificate)中明确要求的。在MSG-3逻辑中,有提到一个Service life的概念,表示符合分析逻辑的Discard项目,但没有在型号合格证中提到的项目。
以下讨论基于假设:认为Hard-Time对应MSG-3逻辑下Restoration和Discard项目(不含LLP);而LLP则被明确定义在ALS(AWL)和Engine Manual等ICA中,且越走越远、要求越来越多。
ppp总结下飞机层面Hard-Time与LLP的差异:

出处源头不同。Hard-Time的要求出现在MRBR和MPD中;LLP的要求出现在ALS(AWL)、特殊运行要求和Engine Manual中。

Life-Limited Parts are including in the Airworthiness Limitations Section of the Instruction for Continued Airworthiness.

——FAA Final Rule 33-22
强制性不同。部分Hard-Time的项目可以经批准的流程延长;LLP项目限制是强制执行。

确定的时机不同。Hard-Time项目确定发生在MRBR准备阶段,LLP项目则出现在型号设计阶段。

管控要求不同。Hard-Time项目简单的以MRBR或MPD形式控制,LLP则有一整套管理要求。以发动机为例,FAA要求:

……necessitate the development and execution of an engineering plan, a manufacturing plan, and a service management plan for each life-limited part. These three plans form a closed-loop system that links the assumptions made in the engineering plan, to how the part is manufactured, and to how the part is maintained in service. Engineering, manufacturing, and service management must function as an integrated system and recognize the effects of actions in one area on the entire system.

——AC 33.70-1

记录要求不同。在规章层面,Hard-Time中涉及定期Overhaul的项目,需要记录自上次翻修的时间;而LLP则需要记录当前的状态(至少包括自新时间和剩余寿命)。但在商业规则层面,LLP的要求非常繁复,比如经常被提及的Back To Birth要求,虽然BTB本身也没有明确的定义。感兴趣可以查看IATA文件Guidance Material and Best Practices for Life-Limited Parts (LLPs)[3]

The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance.

The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis.

——§ 91.417 Maintenance records

总结:越写越无力,终于从一团浆糊写成了一团乱麻。还有很多问题没解决,先放一放,后面有更多研究时再补充、纠正。



参考资料:
[1]FAA AC 120-17A Maintenance Control by Reliability Methods,https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC%20120-17A.pdf
[2]Reliability-Centered Maintenance
[3]IATA Guidance Material and Best Practices for Life-Limited Parts (LLPs) Traceability, https://www.iata.org/contentassets/b94a0e7f14694efe8b72ca1b73052f05/llp-traceability-1st-ed-2020.pdf

感谢大家对机务论坛的支持,关注机务论坛,倾听机务心声!航企优秀的方面必定宣传,不足的地方也必须指出,让领导们重视问题,解决问题,营造更好的机务维修环境。

征稿:
所见所闻,个人感悟,个人成长历程及感人故事。
特别征稿:我师傅的故事!
同时,征集劳动仲裁案例,分享案例,让更多的小伙伴能了解劳动纠纷的解决方式,通过劳动仲裁维护自己的合法权益。



评论区留言,同意的点赞
扫码添加小编微信
匿名爆料

minhangjiwuluntan


民航机务论坛微信公众平台
改名为:机务论坛
发布最新行业动向 深入解读政策法规
开辟维修工程专栏 交流飞机排故经验
分享前沿技术应用 预测职业发展前景
行业大咖讲经布道 业界专家授业解惑
致力打造一流的民航机务朋友圈----机务论坛
关注机务论坛,倾听机务心声!
投稿邮箱:duanwei0615@163.com

机务论坛
民航机务论坛改名为:机务论坛 发布最新行业动向 深入解读政策法规 开辟维修工程专栏 交流飞机排故经验 分享前沿技术应用 预测职业发展前景 行业大咖讲经布道 业界专家授业解惑 致力打造一流的民航机务朋友圈----机务论坛
 最新文章