英国曼彻斯特大学Weiguang Wang等 | 石墨烯和氧化石墨烯对聚己内酯骨组织工程支架影响的体外研究

上下滑动以阅览

1. Hou YH, Wang WG, Bartolo P (2022) Application of additively manufactured 3D scaffolds for bone cancer treatment: a review. Bio-Des Manuf 5(3):556–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-022-00182-7

2. Freed LE, Engelmayr GC Jr, Borenstein JT et al (2009) Advanced material strategies for tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv Mater 21(32–33):3410–3418. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200900303

3. Eckhart KE, Holt BD, Laurencin MG et al (2019) Covalent conjugation of bioactive peptides to graphene oxide for biomedical applications. Biomater Sci 7(9):3876–3885. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9bm00867e

4. Koski C, Bose S (2019) Effects of amylose content on the mechanical properties of starch-hydroxyapatite 3D printed bone scaffolds. Addit Manuf 30:100817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100817

5. Sarkar N, Bose S (2020) Controlled release of soy isoflavones from multifunctional 3D printed bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Acta Biomater 114:407–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.006

6. Harun WSW, Kamariah MSIN, Muhamad N et al (2018) A review of powder additive manufacturing processes for metallic biomaterials. Powder Technol 327:128–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.12.058

7. Wu H, Fahy WP, Kim S et al (2020) Recent developments in polymers/polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing. Prog Mater Sci 111:100638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100638

8. Wang YX, Pereira RF, Peach C et al (2023) Robotic in situ bioprinting for cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Extreme Manuf 5(3):32004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/acda67

9. Kalsi S, Singh J, Sehgal SS et al (2021) Biomaterials for tissue engineered bone scaffolds: a review. Mater Today Proc 81(2):888–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.273

10. Baino F, Novajra G, Vitale-Brovarone C (2015) Bioceramics and scaffolds: a winning combination for tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 3:202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00202

11. Marques A, Miranda G, Silva F et al (2021) Review on current limits and potentialities of technologies for biomedical ceramic scaffolds production. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 109(3):377–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34706

12. Kulkarni SV, Nemade AC, Sonawwanay PD (2022) An overview on metallic and ceramic biomaterials. In: Dave HK, Dixit US, Nedelcu D (Eds.), Recent Advances in Manufacturing Processes and Systems. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, p.149–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7787-8_11

13. Chapter Google Scholar Turnbull G, Clarke J, Picard F et al (2018) 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact Mater 3(3):278–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001

14. Pugliese R, Beltrami B, Regondi S et al (2021) Polymeric biomaterials for 3D printing in medicine: an overview. Ann 3D Print Med 2:100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2021.100011

15. King WE, Bowlin GL (2021) Near-field electrospinning and melt electrowriting of biomedical polymers—progress and limitations. Polymers 13(7):1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071097

16. Eivazzadeh-Keihan R, Maleki A, de la Guardia M et al (2019) Carbon based nanomaterials for tissue engineering of bone: building new bone on small black scaffolds: a review. J Adv Res 18:185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.011

17. Bellet P, Gasparotto M, Pressi S et al (2021) Graphene-based scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Nanomaterials 11(2):404. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020404

18. Amiryaghoubi N, Fathi M, Barzegari A et al (2021) Recent advances in polymeric scaffolds containing carbon nanotube and graphene oxide for cartilage and bone regeneration. Mater Today Commun 26:102097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102097

19. Feng Y, Wang ZW, Zhang RX et al (2017) Anti-fouling graphene oxide based nanocomposites membrane for oil-water emulsion separation. Water Sci Technol 77(5):1179–1185. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.634

20. Porwal H, Grasso S, Cordero-Arias L et al (2014) Processing and bioactivity of 45S5 Bioglass®-graphene nanoplatelets composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 25(6):1403–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5172-x

21. Lopes Nalesso PR, Wang WG, Hou YH et al (2021) In vivo investigation of 3D printed polycaprolactone/graphene electro-active bone scaffolds. Bioprinting 24:e00164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00164

22. Huang XM, Liu LZ, Zhou S et al (2020) Physical properties and device applications of graphene oxide. Front Phys 15(3):33301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-019-0937-9

23. Jiang LL, Chen DY, Wang Z et al (2019) Preparation of an electrically conductive graphene oxide/chitosan scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 188(4):952–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-019-02967-6

24. Fan ZJ, Wang JQ, Liu FZ et al (2016) A new composite scaffold of bioactive glass nanoparticles/graphene: synchronous improvements of cytocompatibility and mechanical property. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 145:438–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.026

25. Gao CD, Liu TT, Shuai CJ et al (2014) Enhancement mechanisms of graphene in nano-58S bioactive glass scaffold: mechanical and biological performance. Sci Rep 4(1):4712. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04712

26. Wang WG, Huang BY, Byun JJ et al (2019) Assessment of PCL/carbon material scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 93:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.020

27. Yang YW, Peng SP, Qi FW et al (2020) Graphene-assisted barium titanate improves piezoelectric performance of biopolymer scaffold. Mater Sci Eng C 116:111195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111195

28. Ding XL, Huang Y, Li XM et al (2021) Three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds incorporated with graphene for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 109(4):515–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37034

29. Zhu C, He MM, Sun D et al (2021) 3D-printed multifunctional polyetheretherketone bone scaffold for multimodal treatment of osteosarcoma and osteomyelitis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(40):47327–47340. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c10898

30. Wang GY, He CX, Yang WJ et al (2020) Surface-modified graphene oxide with compatible interface enhances poly-l-lactic acid bone scaffold. J Nanomater 2020:5634096. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5634096

31. Shuai CJ, Zeng ZC, Yang YW et al (2020) Graphene oxide assists polyvinylidene fluoride scaffold to reconstruct electrical microenvironment of bone tissue. Mater Des 190:108564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108564

32. Bao DS, Sun JC, Gong M et al (2021) Combination of graphene oxide and platelet-rich plasma improves tendon–bone healing in a rabbit model of supraspinatus tendon reconstruction. Regen Biomater 8(6):rbab045. https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbab045

33. Zhang JH, Eyisoylu H, Qin XH et al (2021) 3D bioprinting of graphene oxide-incorporated cell-laden bone mimicking scaffolds for promoting scaffold fidelity, osteogenic differentiation and mineralization. Acta Biomater 121:637–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.026

34. Dinescu S, Ionita M, Ignat SR et al (2019) Graphene oxide enhances chitosan-based 3D scaffold properties for bone tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci 20(20):5077. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20205077

35. Yang YW, Cheng Y, Peng SP et al (2021) Microstructure evolution and texture tailoring of reduced graphene oxide reinforced Zn scaffold. Bioact Mater 6(5):1230–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.017

36. Shadianlou F, Foorginejad A, Yaghoubinezhad Y (2022) Hydrothermal synthesis of zirconia-based nanocomposite powder reinforced by graphene and its application for bone scaffold with 3D printing. Adv Powder Technol 33(2):103406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2021.103406

37. Maleki-Ghaleh H, Hossein Siadati M, Fallah A et al (2021) Effect of zinc-doped hydroxyapatite/graphene nanocomposite on the physicochemical properties and osteogenesis differentiation of 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Chem Eng J 426:131321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131321

38. Zhou K, Yu P, Shi XJ et al (2019) Hierarchically porous hydroxyapatite hybrid scaffold incorporated with reduced graphene oxide for rapid bone ingrowth and repair. ACS Nano 13(8):9595–9606. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b04723

39. Bahrami S, Baheiraei N, Shahrezaee M (2021) Biomimetic reduced graphene oxide coated collagen scaffold for in situ bone regeneration. Sci Rep 11(1):16783. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96271-1

40. Shuai C, Peng B, Liu M et al (2021) A self-assembled montmorillonite-carbon nanotube hybrid nanoreinforcement for poly-l-lactic acid bone scaffold. Mater Today Adv 11:100158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100158

41. Huang BY, Vyas C, Roberts I et al (2019) Fabrication and characterisation of 3D printed MWCNT composite porous scaffolds for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 98:266–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.100

42. Feng P, Wang K, Shuai Y et al (2022) Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in situ grown on carbon nanotube as a reinforcement for poly (ε-caprolactone) bone scaffold. Mater Today Adv 15:100272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2022.100272

43. Lemos R, Maia FR, Ribeiro VP et al (2021) Carbon nanotube-reinforced cell-derived matrix-silk fibroin hierarchical scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. J Mater Chem B 9(46):9561–9574. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tb01972d

44. Hou YH, Wang WG, Bártolo P (2020) Investigating the effect of carbon nanomaterials reinforcing poly(ε-caprolactone) printed scaffolds for bone repair applications. Int J Bioprint 6(2):266. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i2.266

45. Hou YH, Wang WG, Bártolo P (2020) Novel poly(ɛ-caprolactone)/graphene scaffolds for bone cancer treatment and bone regeneration. 3D Print Addit Manuf 7(5):222–229. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2020.0051

46. Pitt CG, Chasalow FI, Hibionada YM et al (1981) Aliphatic polyesters. I. The degradation of poly(ϵ-caprolactone) in vivo. J Appl Polym Sci 26(11):3779–3787. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1981.070261124

47. Sánchez-González S, Diban N, Urtiaga A (2018) Hydrolytic degradation and mechanical stability of poly(ε-caprolactone)/reduced graphene oxide membranes as scaffolds for in vitro neural tissue regeneration. Membranes 8(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8010012

48. ASTM International (2016) Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid cellular plastics. West Conshohocken, PA

49. ASTM International (2015) Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics. West Conshohocken, PA

50. Wang MM, Wu HH, Shen CR et al (2019) Seaweed-like 2D–2D architecture of MoS2/rGO composites for enhanced selective aerobic oxidative coupling of amines. ChemCatChem 11(7):1935–1942. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201900156

51. Kuznetsov VL, Bokova-Sirosh SN, Moseenkov SI et al (2014) Raman spectra for characterization of defective CVD multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Status Solidi B 251(12):2444–2450. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201451195

52. Ai J, Yang L, Liao GY et al (2018) Applications of graphene oxide blended poly(vinylidene fluoride) membranes for the treatment of organic matters and its membrane fouling investigation. Appl Surf Sci 455:502–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.162

53. Kumar S, Azam D, Raj S et al (2016) 3D scaffold alters cellular response to graphene in a polymer composite for orthopedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 104(4):732–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33549

54. Seok JM, Choe G, Lee SJ et al (2021) Enhanced three-dimensional printing scaffold for osteogenesis using a mussel-inspired graphene oxide coating. Mater Des 209:109941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109941

55. Song JQ, Gao HC, Zhu GL et al (2015) The preparation and characterization of polycaprolactone/graphene oxide biocomposite nanofiber scaffolds and their application for directing cell behaviors. Carbon 95:1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.011

56. Haji Mohammadi Gohari P, Haghbin Nazarpak M, Solati-Hashjin M (2021) The effect of adding reduced graphene oxide to electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds on MG-63 cells activity. Mater Today Commun 27:102287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102287

57. Weaver JK (1966) The microscopic hardness of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 48(2):273–288. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196648020-00006

58. Luo CQ, Liao JY, Zhu ZL et al (2019) Analysis of mechanical properties and mechanical anisotropy in canine bone tissues of various ages. Biomed Res Int 2019:3503152. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3503152

59. Lamour G, Hamraoui A, Buvailo A et al (2010) Contact angle measurements using a simplified experimental setup. J Chem Educ 87(12):1403–1407. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100468u

60. Dorrer C, Rühe J (2008) Drops on microstructured surfaces coated with hydrophilic polymers: Wenzel’s model and beyond. Langmuir 24(5):1959–1964. https://doi.org/10.1021/la7029938

61. Khosrozadeh A, Rasuli R, Hamzeloopak H et al (2021) Wettability and sound absorption of graphene oxide doped polymer hydrogel. Sci Rep 11(1):15949. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95641-z

62. Liu HS, Liu XY, Zhao FB et al (2020) Preparation of a hydrophilic and antibacterial dual function ultrafiltration membrane with quaternized graphene oxide as a modifier. J Colloid Interface Sci 562:182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.017

63. Al-Azzam N, Alazzam A (2022) Micropatterning of cells via adjusting surface wettability using plasma treatment and graphene oxide deposition. PLoS ONE 17(6):e0269914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269914

64. Junaidi NFD, Othman NH, Fuzil NS et al (2021) Recent development of graphene oxide-based membranes for oil–water separation: a review. Sep Purif Technol 258:118000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.118000

65. Kołodziej A, Długoń E, Świętek M et al (2021) A Raman spectroscopic analysis of polymer membranes with graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. J Compos Sci 5(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5010020

66. Sayyar S, Murray E, Thompson BC et al (2013) Covalently linked biocompatible graphene/polycaprolactone composites for tissue engineering. Carbon 52:296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.031

67. Murray E, Thompson BC, Sayyar S (2015) Enzymatic degradation of graphene/polycaprolactone materials for tissue engineering. Polym Degrad Stabil 111:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.10.010

68. Wang GS, Wei ZY, Sang L et al (2013) Morphology, crystallization and mechanical properties of poly(ɛ-caprolactone)/graphene oxide nanocomposites. Chin J Polym Sci 31(8):1148–1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-013-1278-8

69. Hua L, Kai WH, Yang JJ et al (2010) A new poly(l-lactide)-grafted graphite oxide composite: facile synthesis, electrical properties and crystallization behaviors. Polym Degrad Stabil 95(12):2619–2627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.07.023

70. Castilla-Cortázar I, Vidaurre A, Marí B et al (2019) Morphology, crystallinity, and molecular eeight of poly(ε-caprolactone)/graphene oxide hybrids. Polymers 11(7):1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11071099

71. Li LY, Li CY, Ni CY (2006) Polymer crystallization-driven, periodic patterning on carbon nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc 128(5):1692–1699. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja056923h

72. Uehara H, Kato K, Kakiage M et al (2007) Single-walled carbon nanotube nucleated solution-crystallization of polyethylene. J Phys Chem C 111(51):18950–18957. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp074005v

73. Rai R, Tallawi M, Frati C et al (2015) Bioactive electrospun fibers of poly(glycerol sebacate) and poly(ε-caprolactone) for cardiac patch application. Adv Healthc Mater 4(13):2012–2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500154

74. Fakhrali A, Nasari M, Poursharifi N et al (2021) Biocompatible graphene-embedded PCL/PGS-based nanofibrous scaffolds: a potential application for cardiac tissue regeneration. J Appl Polym Sci 138(40):51177. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.51177

75. Shuai CJ, Li Y, Yang WJ et al (2020) Graphene oxide induces ester bonds hydrolysis of poly-l-lactic acid scaffold to accelerate degradation. Int J Bioprint 6(1):249. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i1.249

76. Talebi A, Labbaf S, Atari M et al (2021) Polymeric nanocomposite structures based on functionalized graphene with tunable properties for nervous tissue replacement. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 7(9):4591–4601. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00744

77. Thomson RC, Yaszemski MJ, Powers JM et al (1996) Fabrication of biodegradable polymer scaffolds to engineer trabecular bone. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 7(1):23–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856295X00805

78. Williams JM, Adewunmi A, Schek RM et al (2005) Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials 26(23):4817–4827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.057

79. Lotz JC, Gerhart TN, Hayes WC (1990) Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14(1):107–114. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199001000-00020

80. Phiri J, Johansson LS, Gane P et al (2018) A comparative study of mechanical, thermal and electrical properties of graphene-, graphene oxide- and reduced graphene oxide-doped microfibrillated cellulose nanocomposites. Compos B Eng 147:104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.018

81. Ramazani S, Karimi M (2015) Aligned poly(ε-caprolactone)/graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite nanofibers: morphological, mechanical and structural properties. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 56:325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.06.045

82. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL et al (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126(4):677–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044

83. Blacklock J, Vetter A, Lankenau A et al (2010) Tuning the mechanical properties of bioreducible multilayer films for improved cell adhesion and transfection activity. Biomaterials 31(27):7167–7174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.002

84. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL (2005) Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310(5751):1139–1143. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116995

85. Lee WC, Lim CHYX, Shi H et al (2011) Origin of enhanced stem cell growth and differentiation on graphene and graphene oxide. ACS Nano 5(9):7334–7341. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn202190c

86. Arima Y, Iwata H (2007) Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials 28(20):3074–3082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.013

87. Ranella A, Barberoglou M, Bakogianni S et al (2010) Tuning cell adhesion by controlling the roughness and wettability of 3D micro/nano silicon structures. Acta Biomater 6(7):2711–2720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.016

88. Cooper LF, Zhou YS, Takebe J et al (2006) Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 27(6):926–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.009

89. Rausch-fan X, Qu Z, Wieland M et al (2008) Differentiation and cytokine synthesis of human alveolar osteoblasts compared to osteoblast-like cells (MG63) in response to titanium surfaces. Dent Mater 24(1):102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.03.001

90. Liao CZ, Li YC, Tjong SC (2018) Graphene nanomaterials: synthesis, biocompatibility, and cytotoxicity. Int J Mol Sci 19(11):3564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113564

91. Cicuéndez M, Casarrubios L, Barroca N et al (2021) Benefits in the macrophage response due to graphene oxide reduction by thermal treatment. Int J Mol Sci 22(13):6701. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136701

92. Matesanz MC, Vila M, Feito MJ et al (2013) The effects of graphene oxide nanosheets localized on F-actin filaments on cell-cycle alterations. Biomaterials 34(5):1562–1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.001

93. Francolini I, Perugini E, Silvestro I et al (2019) Graphene oxide oxygen content affects physical and biological properties of scaffolds based on chitosan/graphene oxide conjugates. Materials 12(7):1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12071142

94. Wang D, Zhu L, Chen JF et al (2015) Can graphene quantum dots cause DNA damage in cells? Nanoscale 7(21):9894–9901. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr01734c

95. Li Y, Liu Y, Fu YJ et al (2012) The triggering of apoptosis in macrophages by pristine graphene through the MAPK and TGF-beta signaling pathways. Biomaterials 33(2):402–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.091

96. Wu JQ, Kosten TR, Zhang XY (2013) Free radicals, antioxidant defense systems, and schizophrenia. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 46:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.02.015

97. Wang YF, Wang JL, Hao H et al (2016) In vitro and in vivo mechanism of bone tumor inhibition by selenium-doped bone mineral nanoparticles. ACS Nano 10(11):9927–9937. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b03835

98. Achawi S, Feneon B, Pourchez J et al (2021) Assessing biological oxidative damage induced by graphene-based materials: an asset for grouping approaches using the FRAS assay. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 127:105067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105067

99. Hou YH, Wang WG, Bartolo P (2022) Investigation of polycaprolactone for bone tissue engineering scaffolds: in vitro degradation and biological studies. Mater Des 216:110582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110582