成人自发性气胸ERS/EACTS/ESTS专家共识

文摘   2024-05-31 22:57   北京  


点击上方“知识城邦”关注我们吧!
前言

各位好!今日与大家分享一篇基于系统综述和meta分析的原发性气胸专家共识,共识发表在European Respiratory Journal上。本研究中胸外科和呼吸内科领域的专家,研究系统回顾了自发性气胸领域的RCT研究,对目前自发性气胸领域的9大临床问题进行了系统回顾,并基于临床证据提出了推荐性诊疗策略。气胸作为胸外科最常见的疾病之一,一起来看看对这一一个看似简单的疾病,其背后又有着哪些深刻的内含~!


本 文 约2134字 多图预警

 


认真阅读 需 要 5-10 min


Joint ERS/EACTS/ESTS clinical practice guidelines on adults with spontaneous pneumothorax

Steven WalkerRobert HallifaxSara RicciardiDeirdre FitzgeraldMarlies KeijzersOlivia LaukJesper PetersenLuca BertolacciniUffe BodtgerAmelia CliveStefano EliaMarios FroudarakisJulius JanssenY.C. Gary LeePeter LichtGilbert MassardBlin NagavciJens NeudeckerEric RoessnerPaul Van SchilDavid WallerThorsten WallesGiuseppe CardilloNick MaskellNajib Rahman







European Respiratory Journal 21 May 2024

Background: The optimal management for spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) remains contentious, with various proposed approaches. This joint clinical practice guideline from the ERS, EACTS and ESTS societies provides evidence-based recommendations for the management of SP.

景:自发性气胸(SP)的最佳治疗仍然存在争议,有各种建议的方法。这份来自ERS、EACTS和EST协会的联合临床实践指南为SP的管理提供了循证建议。

METHODS: This multidisciplinary Task Force addressed 12 key clinical questions on the management of pneumothorax, using ERS methodology for guideline development. Systematic searches were performed in MEDLINE and Embase. Evidence was synthesised by conducting meta-analyses, if possible, or narratively. Certainty of evidence was rated with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations). The Evidence to Decision framework was used to decide on the direction and strength of the recommendations.

法:这个多学科特别工作组使用ERS方法制定指南,解决了气胸管理的12个关键临床问题。系统检索MEDLINE和Embase。证据是通过进行荟萃分析来合成的,如果可能的话,或者是描述性的。证据的确定性用等级(建议等级、评估等级、发展等级和评价等级)进行评级。用证据到决定框架来决定建议的方向和力度。

RESULTS: The panel makes a conditional recommendation for conservative care of minimally symptomatic patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) who are clinically stable. We make a strong recommendation for needle aspiration over chest tube drain for initial PSP treatment. We make a conditional recommendation for ambulatory management for initial PSP treatment. We make a conditional recommendation for early surgical intervention for the initial treatment of PSP in patients who prioritise recurrence prevention. The panel makes a conditional recommendation for autologous blood patch in secondary SP patients with persistent air leak (PAL). The panel could not make recommendations for other interventions, including bronchial valves, suction, pleurodesis in addition to surgical resection or type of surgical pleurodesis.

果:专家小组建议对临床稳定的有轻微症状的原发性自发性气胸(PSP)患者进行有条件的保守治疗。我们强烈建议在最初的PSP治疗中采用针吸而不是胸管引流。我们建议对最初的PSP进行有条件的门诊治疗。我们有条件地建议对优先预防复发的PSP患者进行早期手术治疗。专家小组提出了一项有条件的建议,在继发性SP合并持续性空气泄漏(PAL)的患者中使用自体血液补片。该小组无法就其他干预措施提出建议,包括支气管瓣、抽吸、除手术切除外的胸膜固定术或手术胸膜固定术的类型。

CONCLUSION: With this international guideline, the ERS, EACTS and ESTS societies provide clinical practice recommendations for SP management. We highlight evidence gaps for the management of PAL and recurrence prevention, with research recommendations made.

结论:根据这一国际指南,ERS、EACTS和EST协会为SP管理提供了临床实践建议。我们强调了PAL的管理和复发预防的证据差距,并提出了研究建议。



学习笔记

1.自发性气胸目前病因不明,部分患者具有家族聚集性。多数患者都会出现反复多次的疾病发作,处理和治疗上也常常存在决策困难,也是徘徊在胸外科天空中的一片阴云。


https://meetingarchive.ami.org/2018/project/pathophysiology-of-primary-spontaneous-pneumothorax/

10.1001/jama.2017.10476


https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/pneumothorax/symptoms-causes/syc-20350367


2. 其次看细节。

①首先这篇发表在ERJ的专家共识,做到了先做详细的背景调查后进行严谨的推荐,并且在附件中提供了详细的检索式和每个问题下的研究背景、研究特点、Meta结果。形式和内核都非常值得学习。特别是在正文描述中采用的格式上介于教科书与指南,在每个PICO问题下面按照下图的体例介绍每个话题,娓娓道来。

②对气胸的处理策略上既往多项研究均建议初发气胸患者更积极干预性策略。但是对具体到患者层面的长程生活质量、干预策略的高质量研究依然还是很少。

③围绕气胸所需要开展的后续研究几乎在每个PICO及回答后边都阐明了临床背景和方向,除了提建议,还提了后续建议大家怎么做。这点难能可贵。


10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.02.070

10.1164/rccm.202110-2409OC

3. 围绕气胸话题,GRAND ROUNDS ARCHIVES 2021-2023每年都会邀请领域内专家做讲座,感谢Professor Eric Lim搭建的平台!推荐大家观看。


https://www.drericlim.com/grand-rounds-2023









目录

1. INTRODUCTION

2. METHODS

    2.1 Scope and purpose of the document

    2.2 Composition of the Task Force panel

    2.3 Formulation of questions and selection of outcomes

Literature searches and evidence synthesis

Assessment of quality of evidence and strength of the recommendations

Conflict of interest management

3. Results

    3.1 Optimal management of acute presentation of pneumothorax

PICO 1: Should conservative management be used for spontaneous pneumothorax(compared to needle aspiration/chest drain)?
PICO 2: Should needle aspiration be used in acute presentation of spontaneous pneumothorax(compared to chest drain)?
PICO 3: Should ambulatory management be used in the acute presentation of spontaneous pneumothorax (compared to needle aspiration/chest drain)?
PICO 4: Should early surgical management or medical management be used in the treatment of acute initial presentation of spontaneous pneumothorax?

    3.2 Optimal management of PAL in patients with a pneumothorax deemed not fit for surgery

PICO 5: Should autologous blood patch (ABP)be used for management of persistent air leak(PAL)in spontaneous pneumothorax(compared to chest drain alone)?

PICO 6: Should bronchial valves be used for management of persistent air leak in spontaneous pneumothorax (compared to chest drain alone)?

PICO 7: Should suction be used for management of persistent air leak in spontaneous pneumothorax (compared to chest drain alone)?

    3.3 Optimal recurrence prevention in SP

PICO 8: Should treatment with pulmonary intervention (VATS)alone be used for recurrence prevention in spontaneous pneumothorax (compared with pulmonary intervention (VATS)plus pleurodesis)?

PICO 9: Should surgical pleurectomy be used for recurrence prevention in spontaneous pneumothorax (compared to chemical pleurodesis,delivered surgically or medically)?

    3.4 Narrative questions

Narrative question 1: What are the optimal methods for predicting initial clinical course and recurrence?

Narrative question 2: What factors influence determination of fitness for surgery and timing of surgical intervention for persistent air leak?

4. Discussion




 图表汇总

1. INTRODUCTION

Figure 1. Approach for management of spontaneous pneumothorax.

This figure is a combination of the recommendations made in this guideline and a description of the Task Force members’ usual practice in situations where there was not enough evidence to warrant a recommendation or for questions for which a systematic review of the literature was not undertaken. Note that the information depicted as usual practice is not intended as a recommendation for clinical practice. PICO: Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome; CXR: chest X-ray; ABP: autologous blood patch; VATS: video-assisted thoracic surgery.


Figure 2. Decision aid for initial management pathways for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.



2. METHODS

    2.3 Formulation of questions and selection of outcomes

Literature searches and evidence synthesis (supplementary material)

Assessment of quality of evidence and strength of the recommendations 

 (supplementary material)

Conflict of interest management

3. Results

Table 1. PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) questions and recommendations


Table 2.Narrative questions and recommendations


OUTCOMES CONSIDERED AND THEIR IMPORTANCE


ERS guideline protocols 



大展宏兔~


知识城邦
每周一篇最新最有价值的医学学术文献。 关注知识城邦,我们一起在了解疾病本质,改善患者预后的道路上前进。(关注领域:恶性肿瘤、胸部肿瘤、肿瘤综合治疗、肿瘤微环境、围术期并发症、麻醉、意识、心理、疼痛、重要器官保护、康复、大数据、人工智能等)
 最新文章