本次给大家整理的是《Landscape and Urban Planning》杂志2025年3月第255期的论文的题目和摘要，一共包括6篇SCI论文！
-----------关注公众号----------
1
Homelessness and nature across landscapes and disciplines: A literature review
【摘要】
The complex social-ecological dynamics of homelessness in natural resource management have become increasingly apparent in recent years. Systematically understanding and engaging with these dynamics across sectors, disciplines, and landscapes has presented a conceptual and methodological challenge for both practitioners and researchers. Though some interdisciplinary research has expanded in recent years, the understanding it has fostered largely remains fragmented across disciplines, and its implications for practice are poorly understood. To help create connections across this fragmented dialogue, we reviewed 111 relevant academic journal articles, books, and reports across a broad range of disciplines. Across this literature, we observed an increasing focus on understanding homelessness drivers, impacts, and solutions through a coupled social-ecological systems lens, though key gaps remain. Research oriented towards urban studies, environmental justice, public health, political ecology, and Indigenous studies offered especially important methodological and conceptual innovations that promise to better confront and address justice in fluid, dynamic, and integrated social-ecological systems. We discuss opportunities for studies to better incorporate community concerns, attend to heterogenous homeless populations, apply multiple scales of analysis across disciplines, address market forces, incorporate diverse worldviews and researcher reflexivity, and address complex social-ecological challenges like climate change. To help mobilize around these needs and opportunities, we encourage researchers, practitioners, and people with lived experiences of homelessness to co-produce a research agenda, a process which could establish a shared foundation for increased collaboration across sectors and disciplines and identify priorities for better understanding and attending to the complex and contested challenges of homelessness across landscapes.
近年来，无家可归现象在自然资源管理中的复杂社会-生态动态日益显现。系统地理解并跨部门、跨学科、跨景观地应对这些动态，为从业者和研究人员带来了概念和方法上的挑战。尽管近年来一些跨学科研究有所扩展，但其所促进的理解在各学科之间仍然高度碎片化，其对实践的影响也尚不清晰。为了在这一碎片化的对话中建立联系，我们回顾了111篇相关的学术期刊文章、书籍和报告，涵盖了广泛的学科领域。在这些文献中，我们观察到越来越多的研究通过耦合社会-生态系统的视角来理解无家可归的驱动因素、影响和解决方案，尽管仍存在关键的研究空白。针对城市研究、环境正义、公共健康、政治生态学和土著研究的研究，提供了特别重要的方法论和概念创新，有望更好地应对和解决流动性强、动态且综合的社会-生态系统中的正义问题。我们讨论了研究在更好地纳入社区关切、关注异质的无家可归群体、跨学科应用多重分析尺度、应对市场力量、融合多样的世界观和研究者反思性以及应对气候变化等复杂的社会-生态挑战方面的机会。为了推动这些需求和机会的实现，我们鼓励研究人员、从业者以及有无家可归经历的人共同制定研究议程，这一过程有助于建立跨部门和跨学科合作的共同基础，并确定在不同景观中更好理解和应对无家可归复杂且有争议的挑战的优先事项。
2
The planning of urban–rural linkages: An automated content analysis of spatial plans adopted by European intermediate cities
城乡联结的规划：欧洲中等城市所采用的空间规划的自动内容分析
【摘要】
Rapidly advancing urbanization increasingly deepens cities’ interdependencies with surrounding suburban and rural territories, leading to unique planning challenges. Yet, there is limited comparative understanding of how urban–rural linkages are practically addressed through spatial planning. This study explores the extent and variety to which urban–rural linkages are integrated into both statutory and non-statutory local spatial plans. Specifically, we ask whether cities address in their plans the broad set of physical and functional linkages that typically exist within city-regions. Employing natural language processing (NLP) tools for automated content analysis, a method particularly adept at handling large-scale textual data, we analyze 257 municipal spatial plans from 125 so-called intermediate cities across 20 European OECD countries. This approach allows for substantial comparison of planning contents at the local level. We find that urban–rural linkages and the city-region as a complementary territorial scale for planning are addressed more frequently in non-statutory plans and, partially, in plans that were adopted jointly by city governments with surrounding municipalities. While statutory plans show more attention toward physical linkages such as interlocking built-up areas, non-statutory plans encompass broader socio-economic dimensions, including commuting flows, economic, and transport planning. These findings reflect the practical importance of more strategic, informal planning mechanisms when addressing urban–rural dynamics. Our study provides vital insights into the variety of policy fields that are addressed in local planning in Europe and provides venues for future research on urban–rural planning dynamics.
迅速推进的城市化日益加深了城市与周边郊区和农村地区的相互依赖关系，带来了独特的规划挑战。然而，对于城市—农村联系如何通过空间规划在实践中得到解决的比较理解仍然有限。本研究探讨了城市—农村联系在法定和非法定地方空间规划中整合的程度和多样性。具体而言，我们研究城市是否在其规划中涵盖了通常存在于城市区域内的一系列广泛的物理和功能联系。采用自然语言处理（NLP）工具进行自动内容分析，这是一种特别适合处理大规模文本数据的方法，我们分析了来自20个欧洲经合组织国家125个所谓中级城市的257个市政空间规划。这种方法使得在地方层面对规划内容进行大规模比较成为可能。我们发现，城市—农村联系以及作为规划互补领土尺度的城市区域在非法定规划中更为频繁地被提及，并且在部分由城市政府与周边市镇联合制定的规划中也有所涉及。虽然法定规划对物理联系（如相互连接的建成区）给予了更多关注，但非法定规划涵盖了更广泛的社会经济维度，包括通勤流、经济和交通规划。这些发现反映了在应对城市—农村动态时，更具战略性和非正式的规划机制在实践中的重要性。我们的研究为欧洲地方规划中涉及的政策领域多样性提供了重要见解，并为未来关于城市—农村规划动态的研究提供了方向。
3
Not or Yes in My Back Yard? A physiological and psychological measurement of urban residents in Taiwan
“不还是可以”在我的后院？台湾城市居民的生理与心理测量
【摘要】
Global urbanization has resulted in a dense concentration of population in cities worldwide. In Asia’s densely populated cities, the existence of “Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY)” facilities is essential for public infrastructure development. However, most NIMBY facilities, such as cemeteries, funeral parlors, electrical towers, garbage dumps, and gas stations, are directly exposed to the urban environment without special environmental design considerations. Additionally, Feng-Shui considerations for the living environments contribute to a negative impression and rejection of NIMBY facilities. This study posits a research hypothesis: Do people experience negative physiological and psychological effects in a NIMBY environment compared to a “Yes In My Back Yard (YIMBY)” environment? This study employed the Fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) to gather experts’ perceptions of NIMBY. Subsequently, virtual reality (VR) scenes based on NIMBY and YIMBY fields were introduced. Heart rate variability (HRV) and emotional state questionnaires (POMS) were utilized to measure the physiological and psychological changes among subjects in both environments. Twenty-eight participants engaged in a two-week experiment, and statistical analysis was employed to compare the significant differences in physiological and psychological values in different environments. The results indicated that the participants in the YIMBY environment exhibited more positive physiological responses. The POMS results also supported the notion that the participants generally demonstrated more stable emotional performance in the YIMBY environment. For future considerations, it is recommended that urban environmental planning and design incorporate more YIMBY elements to promote urban residents’ physical and mental health.
全球城市化导致全球范围内城市人口密集集中。在亚洲人口密集的城市中，“不在我后院”（NIMBY）设施的存在对公共基础设施的发展至关重要。然而，大多数NIMBY设施，如公墓、殡仪馆、电力塔、垃圾填埋场和加油站，直接暴露在城市环境中，缺乏特别的环境设计考虑。此外，风水对居住环境的考量也加剧了对NIMBY设施的负面印象和拒绝。本研究提出了一个研究假设：与“在我后院”（YIMBY）环境相比，人们在NIMBY环境中是否会经历负面的生理和心理影响？本研究采用模糊德尔菲法（FDM）收集专家对NIMBY的看法。随后，引入了基于NIMBY和YIMBY领域的虚拟现实（VR）场景。利用心率变异性（HRV）和情绪状态问卷（POMS）测量受试者在两种环境中的生理和心理变化。二十八名参与者参与了为期两周的实验，并通过统计分析比较不同环境中生理和心理值的显著差异。结果表明，YIMBY环境中的参与者表现出更积极的生理反应。POMS结果也支持参与者在YIMBY环境中总体表现出更稳定的情绪表现。未来建议在城市环境规划和设计中纳入更多YIMBY元素，以促进城市居民的身心健康。
4
Who values urban open spaces? investigating heterogeneity in the capitalization of open space in New York city
谁重视城市开放空间？纽约市开放空间资本化异质性的研究
【摘要】
Given the constraints on local budgets and the availability of urban land, understanding how different urban green spaces are valued by diverse residents is crucial for making informed urban land use decisions. We estimate the heterogeneity in housing price capitalizations of various open space classes in New York City using a hedonic price model. Our findings reveal that the capitalization of open spaces varies across open space types and nearby housing types. For instance, compared to residents who live in properties with private outdoor spaces, residents in condominiums and cooperatives may place greater value on open spaces such as neighborhood parks or community gardens. Furthermore, we aim to uncover how demographic factors are associated with the valuation of different types of open spaces, focusing on two sets of community factors: median household income and racial composition. Our results show that areas with low-income populations or a predominance of non-white residents exhibit substantially different preferences from other groups, with an increased capitalization for community gardens and a decreased capitalization for flagship parks. These insights highlight the importance of investigating heterogeneity in the valuation of environmental amenities and can help policymakers allocate funds for environmental amenities to better align with the preferences of local residents.
鉴于地方预算的限制和城市土地的可用性，了解不同城市绿地在多样化居民中的价值观对于做出明智的城市土地使用决策至关重要。我们采用享乐价格模型估算了纽约市各种开放空间类别在房价资本化中的异质性。研究结果显示，不同类型的开放空间及其周边住房类型对开放空间的资本化程度存在差异。例如，与拥有私人户外空间的物业居民相比，公寓和合作社的居民可能更重视社区公园或社区花园等开放空间。此外，我们旨在揭示人口统计因素如何与不同类型开放空间的价值评估相关，重点关注两组社区因素：家庭收入中位数和种族构成。结果表明，低收入人口聚居区或非白人居民占多数的地区，其偏好与其他群体显著不同，社区花园的资本化程度增加，而旗舰公园的资本化程度下降。这些洞见强调了研究环境设施价值评估异质性的重要性，并有助于政策制定者在分配环境设施资金时更好地与当地居民的偏好相一致。
5
A greener Green Belt? Co-developing exploratory scenarios for contentious peri-urban landscapes
更绿色的绿带？共同制定有争议的城市周边景观探索情景
【摘要】
Peri-urban landscapes experience conflicting land-use demands from co-occurring urban–rural drivers. In England, Green Belts are urban containment policies which impact on the peri-urban in isolation from the wider landscapes they cover. Green Belts’ endurance in planning policy have resulted in a contentious and politicised policy arena, under significant scrutiny. Whilst research has shown heterogeneous supplies of ecosystem services existing in Green Belts, it is unclear how and whether Green Belts as landscapes may change in the future beyond their urban containment bounds. Though participatory scenarios have been extensively applied to landscape planning, they have not to English Green Belts. Addressing these gaps, a cross-sector stakeholder workshop was held to co-develop exploratory Green Belt landscape scenarios nationally in 20 years’ time. Three scenarios: “Intensify & Diversify”, “Build-Build-Build” and “Multifunctional” were framed on a governance-functionality axis, identifying future drivers, impacts and assumptions. The scenarios reveal Green Belts are under increased pressure from multiple land-uses, societal demands, and policies, many of which are in conflict, stemming from either a prioritisation or balancing of these demands through varying governance mechanisms. Stakeholder critiques and visions reveal a substantial cross-sector consensus for more (multi)functional Green Belts in England, including as “strategic urban support landscapes” to adapt and mitigate threats associated with climate change. Finally, complementary landscape photo-visualisations of “fictitious” landscapes were produced, aided by artificial intelligence, highlighting the growing potential of these tools to support landscape research. This use of fictional landscapes extends the applicability of our results to peri-urban areas experiencing comparable contexts and drivers, such as Western and Northern European regions.
郊区景观面临来自共存的城乡驱动因素的相互冲突的土地利用需求。在英格兰，绿带是城市约束政策，单独影响郊区，而不考虑其覆盖的更广泛景观。绿带在规划政策中的持久性导致了一个有争议且政治化的政策领域，受到高度关注。尽管研究表明绿带中存在异质性的生态系统服务供应，但尚不清楚绿带作为景观在未来是否以及如何超越其城市约束范围发生变化。虽然参与式情景已广泛应用于景观规划，但尚未应用于英格兰的绿带。为填补这些空白，举办了一场跨部门利益相关者研讨会，共同制定未来20年全国性的探索性绿带景观情景。三个情景：“强化与多样化”（Intensify & Diversify）、“建设-建设-建设”（Build-Build-Build）和“多功能”（Multifunctional），基于治理-功能性轴线构建，识别未来的驱动因素、影响和假设。这些情景揭示，绿带正面临来自多种土地利用、社会需求和政策的日益增加的压力，其中许多压力相互冲突，源于通过不同治理机制对这些需求进行优先排序或平衡。利益相关者的批评和愿景显示，跨部门之间对于在英格兰实现更具（多）功能性的绿带达成了广泛共识，包括将其作为“战略性城市支持景观”以适应和缓解与气候变化相关的威胁。最后，借助人工智能生成了“虚构”景观的补充景观照片可视化，突显了这些工具在支持景观研究方面日益增长的潜力。使用虚构景观扩展了我们的研究结果的适用性，使其适用于经历类似背景和驱动因素的郊区地区，如西欧和北欧地区。
6
Revealing future effectiveness of protected areas for biodiversity conservation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area
揭示广东-香港-澳门大湾区保护区未来在生物多样性保护中的有效性
【摘要】
The biodiversity of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) is increasingly under threat due to anthropogenic stressors and climate change challenges, despite 15.72% of the landscape being planned as protected areas (PAs). The uncertain risks of high-density urban sprawl and sea level rise pose challenges for future biodiversity conservation in the GBA. To effectively gauge the impact of PAs for biodiversity conservation, it’s imperative to delve into not only the pattern but the process of biodiversity. Adopting a dynamic view for biodiversity assessment, our study established a synergistic approach within a systematic conservation planning framework, focusing on comprehensively assessing the future conservation effectiveness of PAs. Four modeling techniques were integrated in the process to estimate conservation priorities under various future scenarios: SLAMM and Dyna-CLUE projected future land-use changes, MaxEnt predicted shifts in habitat suitability for key species, and Zonation identified conservation priorities thereby. The results indicated a potential shift in conservation priorities over time from inland to coastal areas across different cities in the GBA, highlighting the substantial mismatches between current PAs and high-priority areas in Guangdong and the urgency for prompt conservation actions. Moreover, our findings revealed that proposed PA system has not sufficiently prioritized wetland conservation, nor has it effectively conserved amphibian, plant and bird species. Our study provided a dynamic and comprehensive evaluation of biodiversity in the GBA and offered insightful conservation recommendations, thus demonstrating a viable approach for assessing and enhancing future conservation initiatives in similar contexts.
尽管广东-香港-澳门大湾区（GBA）有15.72%的景观被规划为保护区（PAs），但由于人为压力和气候变化的挑战，GBA的生物多样性正日益受到威胁。高密度城市蔓延和海平面上升的不确定风险为GBA未来的生物多样性保护带来了挑战。为了有效评估保护区对生物多样性保护的影响，必须深入研究生物多样性的模式和过程。本研究采用动态视角进行生物多样性评估，在系统保护规划框架内建立了一种协同方法，重点全面评估保护区未来的保护效果。研究过程中整合了四种建模技术，以估算不同未来情景下的保护优先级：SLAMM和Dyna-CLUE预测未来土地利用变化，MaxEnt预测关键物种栖息地适宜性的变化，Zonation识别保护优先区。结果表明，GBA不同城市的保护优先级可能随时间从内陆转向沿海地区，凸显了当前保护区与广东高优先级地区之间的重大不匹配，以及迅速采取保护行动的紧迫性。此外，研究发现，拟议的保护区系统尚未充分优先考虑湿地保护，也未能有效保护两栖动物、植物和鸟类物种。本研究为GBA的生物多样性提供了动态且全面的评估，并提出了有见地的保护建议，从而展示了一种在类似背景下评估和增强未来保护举措的可行方法。
7
Evaluating objective and perceived ecosystem service in urban context: An indirect method based on housing market
-----------关注公众号----------
