Using CT features of cystic airspace to predict lung adenocarcinoma invasiveness
Yu Zhang1# , Bo-Wen Ding2#, Lu-Na Wang1, Wei-Ling Ma1, Li Zhu1*, Qun-Hui Chen1*, Hong Yu1*
Contributions: (I) Conception and design: Y Zhang, H Yu; (II) Administrative support: None; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: Y Zhang, BW Ding, LN Wang, WL Ma; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Y Zhang, LN Wang, WL Ma; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: Y Zhang, L Zhu; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.
#These authors contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
Background: Lung adenocarcinoma associated with cystic airspace (LACA) was once considered an uncommon manifestation of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and understandings of it are limited; however, it is being observed more frequently in clinical practice. This study sought to assess the prevalence of LACA, and compare the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) features of LACA in patients with varying degrees of invasiveness.
Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed the HRCT scans of 1,525 patients with LUAD ≤3 cm in diameter at the Shanghai Chest Hospital between January 2016 and May 2016. Each nodule was examined to detect the presence of cystic airspace. Additionally, we analyzed the qualitative HRCT findings of the cystic airspaces, including the pattern, number, wall component density, distribution, inner surface, mural nodules, septa, and vessels passing through the cystic airspace using the Pearson χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. We also analyzed the quantitative measurements, such as the cystic airspace diameter, wall thickness, and thin-wall proportion, using a one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test as appropriate.
Results: LACAs were observed on HRCT in 11.5% (176/1,525) of the patients, of whom 7.1% (36/505) had pure ground-glass nodules, 13.5% (112/830) had mixed ground-glass nodules, and 14.7% (28/190) had solid nodules (P=0.001). The surgical procedures for LACAs varied (P=0.012). The incidence of LACAs increased as nodule diameter and invasiveness increased (both P<0.001). Statistically significant differences were observed in the wall component density, distribution, septa, vessels passing through the cystic airspace, cystic airspace diameter, wall thickness, and thin-wall proportion among the preinvasive lesion (PL), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) groups (P<0.001, P=0.024, P=0.001, P=0.025, P=0.001, P<0.001, and P<0.001, respectively). Wall component density increased as invasiveness increased (P<0.001). Unlike those in the MIAs and IACs, cystic airspaces in PLs typically lacked septa (P=0.001, and P<0.001, respectively). The IACs had larger cystic airspace diameters than the PLs (6.5 vs. 3.7 mm) (P<0.001). The IACs also had thicker wall thickness (11.8 vs. 6.8 mm, 11.8 vs. 8.3 mm) (P<0.001, and P<0.001, respectively) and smaller thin-wall proportions (181.5° vs. 264.8°, 181.5° vs. 223.8°) (P<0.001, and P=0.039, respectively) than the PLs and MIAs.
Conclusions: The prevalence and characteristics of cystic airspaces on HRCT can be used to predict invasiveness in patients with LUADs ≤3 cm in diameter.
Keywords: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD); invasiveness; high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT); cystic airspaces
Submitted May 06, 2024. Accepted for publication Sep 05, 2024. Published online Sep 26, 2024.
doi: 10.21037/qims-24-912
IntroductionOther Section
The use of computed tomography (CT) screening to reduce lung cancer mortality has increased the detection of lung nodules (1,2). However, due to their atypical and rare features, the accurate diagnosis of these lung nodules remains challenging for radiologists. Recent analyses of lung cancer screening trials have shown that 22.7% (5/22) of missed or delayed lung cancer diagnoses are associated with the cystic airspace appearing as a “bulla with wall thickening or a mural nodule” (3). A cystic airspace is defined as a round, parenchymal, gas-containing lesion with a well-defined interface with normal lung tissue (4). The definition was first standardized by the Fleischner Society in 1996 and later updated in 2008 and 2017 (4-6).
Lung cancer associated with cystic airspace (LCCA) was once considered an uncommon manifestation of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD); however, it is being observed more frequently in clinical practice (7). Data from the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP) showed that cystic airspaces presented in 3.7% (26/706) of lung cancer cases (7). The key diagnostic features of malignancy include wall thickness, mural nodules, and wall components (8), and any changes in these features during follow-up (4,9). Due to the rarity of LCCAs, their high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) features remain underrecognized. Regular clinical follow-up examinations are required to detect wall thickening or the appearance/increase of a nodule inside or outside the cystic airspace, which may indicate lung cancer; however, such examinations place economic and psychological burdens on patients (7,9). The pathological types of LCCAs include adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, poorly differentiated carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma. Lung adenocarcinoma is the most commonly histological type associated with cystic airspaces (4,9,10). To date, little research has been conducted on the prevalence and morphology of LUAD associated with cystic airspace (LACA) features on HRCT (8,11), especially in terms of the degree of invasiveness. Thus, this study sought to investigate the prevalence of LACA and compare the HRCT features of LACA in patients with varying degrees of invasiveness. We present this article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-24-912/rc).
MethodsOther Section
Patients
The Institutional Review Board of the Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, approved this retrospective, single-center study [No. KS(Y)21293]. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013), and the requirement of individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived. In total, 1,525 lesions were retrospectively identified in 1,406 consecutive patients newly diagnosed with LUADs ≤3 cm in diameter at this tertiary care hospital between January 2016 and May 2016. The patients were aged 17–85 years (average: 56.5±10.8 years), and 474 were male and 932 were female. Among the patients, 407 underwent wedge resection, 246 underwent segmentectomy, 871 underwent lobectomy, and one underwent combined segmentectomy and lobectomy. The lesions were distributed across the lung lobes as follows: right upper lobe: 564; right middle lobe: 127; right lower lobe: 236; left upper lobe: 407; left lower lobe: 189, and right upper and lower cross-lobe: 2. There were 455 preinvasive lesions (PLs), including 32 atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) lesions, 423 adenocarcinomas in situ (AISs), 392 minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIAs), and 678 invasive adenocarcinomas (IACs). Additionally, 52 patients had lymph node metastases and 88 had visceral pleural metastases.
Patients were excluded from the study if they met any of the following exclusion criteria: (I) displayed airspace in the center of a previously solid lesion suggesting cavitation; (II) displayed airspace indistinguishable from surrounding emphysema, bronchiectasis, or cystic interstitial lung disease; (III) had an incomplete CT target scan; (IV) the resected lesion did not correspond to the CT target scan; (V) the lesion had been proven to be LUAD by histopathology, but had not been confirmed to be the primary lesion.
CT scanning
An unenhanced routine CT with continuous thin sections over the entire lung volume was performed with a multi-slice (16-, 64-, 128-, and 256-slice) spiral CT scanner (Brilliance, Ingenuity, iCT, Philips, USA; Discovery CT750, GE, USA; uCT510, UIH, China) using a helical technique at the end of inspiration during a single breath-hold. Scanning parameters included 64 mm × 0.625 mm detector collimation, 1.08 pitch, 5.0 mm section thickness and interval, 5–7 s scan time, 512×512 matrix, 400 mm field of view (FOV), 120 kVp, and 250 mA. When a lung nodule was detected, a HRCT target scan was conducted with the following parameters: 64 mm × 0.625 mm collimation, 0.64 pitch, 1.0 mm section thickness and interval, 1–3 s scan time, 1024×1024 (Brilliance/Ingenuity/iCT) matrix or 512×512 matrix (Discovery CT750/uCT510), 180 mm FOV, 120 kVp, and 300 mA. The reconstruction algorithms for the routine CT and targeted HRCT scans were “standard” and “sharp”, respectively.
Evaluation of CT features
Cystic airspace was defined as a circumscribed parenchymal air-containing region with a well-defined wall at the interface inside or outside the lesion (12). The presence of the cystic airspace for each nodule was evaluated two times (eight months later for the second time) by one radiologist (Y.Z., who had 12 years of experience in chest imaging). Pulmonary parenchyma was evaluated for the presence or absence of emphysema in the lobe containing LUAD, particularly surrounding the lesion. The cystic airspace outside the lesion was not recorded when emphysema occurred in the background of the lung parenchyma. The HRCT findings for each nodule were analyzed in terms of: (I) density [pure ground-glass nodule (PGGN) or mixed ground-glass nodule (MGGN), or solid nodule]; (II) location; (III) surgery type (wedge resection, segmentectomy, or lobectomy); (IV) multiplicity (the presence of two or more ground-glass nodules (GGNs) in an individual); and (V) diameter. When cystic airspaces were confirmed, two radiologists (Y.Z. and L.Z., who had 12 and 22 years of experience in chest imaging, respectively), who were blinded to the invasiveness of the nodules, assessed the HRCT images of the LACAs in a lung window (width: 1,450 HUs; level: –520 HUs). The decisions as to the CT findings were reached by consensus.
In relation to the characteristics of the cystic airspace, the HRCT qualitative findings were analyzed in terms of the: (I) pattern (type I: the cystic airspace was entirely within the nodule; type II: more than half of the cystic airspace was within the nodule; or type III: more than half of the cystic airspace was outside the nodule); (II) number (one, two, or multiple locules); (III) wall component density (PGGN, MGGN, or solid nodule); (IV) distribution (eccentric or centric); (V) inner surface (smooth or irregular); (VI) mural nodules (yes/no); (VII) septa (yes/no); and (VIII) vessels passing through the cystic airspace. When multiple patterns of cystic airspaces were present in the nodules, only the largest cystic airspace was analyzed.
The quantitative measurements of the cystic airspace included the following: (I) cystic airspace diameter (the largest cystic airspace diameter on the axial section); (II) wall thickness (the largest diameter on the axial section, running perpendicular to the tangent of the cystic airspace, from the border of the cystic airspace to that of the ground-glass opacity/solid component); and (III) thin-wall proportion [circumferential thickening <4 mm of the cystic airspace as calculated in degrees; 0° represented thickening of the entire wall of the airspace and 360° represented no focal thickening (6)]. If a patient underwent several preoperative CT examinations at our department that revealed the same LACA, the radiological features of the latest CT images of this patient were analyzed.
Pathological evaluation
The surgically removed specimens were fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned with a microtome, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. According to the 2015 international multidisciplinary classification of LUADs, the nodules underwent histopathological analysis and were classified by two experienced pulmonary pathologists.
Statistical analysis
The HRCT findings of positive and negative cystic lung nodules were compared using the Pearson χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate for the categorical variables, and a one-way analysis of variance or the Mann-Whitney U test for the continuous variables. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multiple comparisons of the three groups (i.e., the PL, MIA, and IAC groups) were performed using the Pearson χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate for the categorical variables, and a P value <0.017 indicated a statistically significant difference. Multiple comparisons of the three groups were performed using the Bonferroni test (P<0.05) or Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test (P<0.017) as appropriate for the continuous variables. All the tests were two-sided and analyzed by SPSS (version 22.0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).
ResultsOther Section
Of the LUAD nodules (Figure 1), 176 of 1,525 (11.5%) showed cystic airspace on HRCT as follows: PL: 4.6% (21/455); AAH: 3.1% (1/32); AIS: 4.7% (20/423); MIA: 8.4% (33/392); and IAC: 18.0% (122/678). Table 1 sets out the demographics and HRCT features of the LACAs; LACAs were more common than LUADs without cystic airspaces in older male patients (P=0.036 and P<0.001, respectively). Cystic airspace was observed in 7.1% (36/505) of the PGGNs, 13.5% (112/830) of the MGGNs, and 14.7% (28/190) of the solid nodules (P=0.001). The prevalence of cystic airspaces was significantly higher in the MGGNs than the PGGNs (P<0.001), and in the solid nodules than the PGGNs (P=0.002). The surgical procedures for the LACAs differed significantly (P=0.012), such that the patients were more likely to undergo lobectomy than wedge resection (P=0.006). The incidence of LACAs increased as lesion diameter increased (13.1 vs. 19.8 mm) (P<0.001). The prevalence of LACAs increased as LUAD invasiveness increased (P<0.001) and was higher in IACs than PLs and MIAs (P<0.001, and P<0.001, respectively), and slightly higher in MIAs than PLs but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.024, >0.017). However, the occurrence of LACAs was not found to be related to lesion distribution, multiplicity, lymph node metastasis, visceral pleural metastasis, or biological indicators.
Figure 1 Flow diagram showing the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. CT, computed tomography.
Table 1
The clinicopathological characteristics and the incidence of LACA
Variables | Cystic airspace | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Negative (n=1,349) | Positive (n=176) | ||
Gender | <0.001 | ||
Male | 410 (81.3) | 94 (18.7) | |
Female | 939 (92.0) | 82 (8.0) | |
Age (years) | 56.2±10.8 | 58.2±10.3 | 0.036† |
Density | 0.001 | ||
PGGN | 469 (92.9) | 36 (7.1) | |
MGGN | 718 (86.5) | 112 (13.5) | |
Solid | 162 (85.3) | 28 (14.7) | |
Location | 0.892‡ | ||
Right upper lobe | 503 (89.2) | 61 (10.8) | |
Right middle lobe | 113 (89.0) | 14 (11.0) | |
Right lower lobe | 209 (88.6) | 27 (11.4) | |
Left upper lobe | 359 (88.2) | 48 (11.8) | |
Left lower lobe | 163 (86.2) | 26 (13.8) | |
Right upper and lower lobe | 2 (100.0) | 0 | |
Surgery | 0.012‡ | ||
Wedge resection | 373 (91.6) | 34 (8.4) | |
Segmentectomy | 224 (91.1) | 22 (8.9) | |
Lobectomy | 751 (86.2) | 120 (13.8) | |
Segmentectomy and lobectomy | 1 (100.0) | 0 | |
Multiply | 589 (87.6) | 83 (12.4) | 0.379 |
Lymph node metastasis§ | 0.108 | ||
Negative | 1068 (88.2) | 143 (11.8) | |
Positive | 42 (80.8) | 10 (19.2) | |
Visceral pleural metastasis§ | 0.072 | ||
Negative | 401 (88.7) | 51 (11.3) | |
Positive | 72 (81.8) | 16 (18.2) | |
Biological indicators§ | 0.351 | ||
Negative | 818 (89.1) | 100 (10.9) | |
Positive | 93 (86.1) | 15 (13.9) | |
Diameter (mm) | 13.1±6.3 | 19.8±6.2 | <0.001† |
Pathology | <0.001 | ||
PL | 434 (95.4) | 21 (4.6) | |
MIA | 359 (91.6) | 33 (8.4) | |
IAC | 556 (82.0) | 122 (18.0) |
Data are presented as n (%) and mean ± standard deviation. †, Mann-Whitney rank-sum test; ‡, Fisher’s exact test; §, there were missing cases. LACA, lung adenocarcinomas associated with cystic airspace; PGGN, pure ground-glass nodule; MGGN, mixed ground-glass nodule; PL, preinvasive lesions; MIA, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas; IAC, invasive adenocarcinomas.
Table 2 sets out the HRCT characteristics of the cystic airspaces in the PL, MIA, and IAC groups. Statistically significant differences were observed in terms of the wall component density, distribution, septa, vessels passing through the cystic airspace, cystic airspace diameter, wall thickness, and thin-wall proportion (P<0.001, P=0.024, P=0.001, P=0.025, P=0.001, P<0.001, and P<0.001, respectively); however, no statistically significant differences were observed in terms of the pattern, number, inner surface, and mural nodules (P=0.758, P=0.316, P>0.99, and P=0.382, respectively). Table 3 sets out the results of multiple comparisons among the three groups for the above statistically significant parameters. Wall component density increased as invasiveness increased (P<0.001). On HRCT, wall component density was more likely to appear as MGGNs in MIA than PL, for which it mainly appeared as PGGNs (P=0.01) (Figure 2), while wall component density was more likely to appear as MGGNs or solid nodules in IAC than PL and MIA (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) (Figure 3). The cystic airspaces in PL typically lacked septa, unlike those in MIA and IAC (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) (Figure 4). IAC had a larger cystic airspace diameter than PL (6.5 vs. 3.7 mm) (P<0.001) (Figures 5,6). The wall thickness of the cystic airspace was thicker in IAC than PL and MIA (11.8 vs. 6.8 mm, 11.8 vs. 8.3 mm) (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) (Figures 5,6). The thin-wall proportion was smaller in IAC than PL and MIA (181.5° vs. 264.8°, 181.5° vs. 223.8°) (P<0.001, and P=0.039, respectively) (Figure 6).
Table 2
The HRCT characteristics of lung adenocarcinomas with cystic airspaces in the three groups
Variables | PL | MIA | IAC | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pattern | 0.758† | |||
Type I | 13 (11.4) | 21 (18.4) | 80 (70.2) | |
Type II | 6 (13.3) | 7 (15.6) | 32 (71.1) | |
Type III | 2 (11.8) | 5 (29.4) | 10 (58.8) | |
Number | 0.316† | |||
One | 18 (14.9) | 24 (19.8) | 79 (65.3) | |
Two | 2 (8.3) | 5 (20.8) | 17 (70.8) | |
Multiple | 1(3.2) | 4 (12.9) | 26 (83.9) | |
Wall component density | <0.001† | |||
PGGN | 17 (35.4) | 15 (31.3) | 16 (33.3) | |
MGGN | 4 (4.0) | 18 (18.0) | 78 (78.0) | |
Solid | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 28 (100.0) | |
Distribution | 0.024 | |||
Eccentric | 13 (9.7) | 21 (15.7) | 100 (74.6) | |
Centric | 8 (19.0) | 12 (28.6) | 22 (52.4) | |
Inner surface | >0.99† | |||
Smooth | 18 (11.8) | 29 (19.1) | 105 (69.1) | |
Irregular | 3 (12.5) | 4 (16.7) | 17 (70.8) | |
Mural nodules | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (100.0) | 0.382† |
Septa | 1 (1.4) | 15 (20.3) | 58 (78.4) | 0.001 |
Vessels passing through the cystic airspace | 4 (6.2) | 8 (12.3) | 53 (81.5) | 0.025 |
Cystic airspace diameter (mm) | 3.7±1.8 | 5.6±3.9 | 6.5±4.3 | 0.001‡ |
Wall thickness (mm) | 6.8±2.7 | 8.3±4.0 | 11.8±4.3 | <0.001 |
Thin-wall proportion (°) | 264.8±76.2 | 223.8±88.1 | 181.5±86.7 | <0.001 |
Data are presented as n (%) and mean ± standard deviation. †, Fisher’ exact test; ‡, Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test. HRCT, high-resolution computed tomography; PL, preinvasive lesions; MIA, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas; IAC, invasive adenocarcinomas; PGGN, pure ground-glass nodule; MGGN, mixed ground-glass nodule.
Table 3 P
value for the multiple comparisons of the three groups
Variables | PL vs. MIA | PL vs. IAC | MIA vs. IAC |
---|---|---|---|
Wall component density | 0.01 | <0.001† | <0.001 |
Distribution | 0.898 | 0.046† | 0.024 |
Septa | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.831 |
Vessels passing through the cystic airspace | 0.747† | 0.035 | 0.045 |
Cystic airspace diameter | 0.049 | <0.001 | 0.151 |
Wall thickness | 0.567‡ | <0.001‡ | <0.001‡ |
Thin-wall proportion | 0.268‡ | <0.001‡ | 0.039‡ |
A P value <0.017 was considered to be statistically significant difference. †, Fisher’ exact test; ‡, a P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant according to the Bonferroni test. PL, preinvasive lesions; MIA, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas; IAC, invasive adenocarcinomas.
Figure 2 A 70-year-old woman with a minimally invasive adenocarcinoma in the right middle lobe of the lung. Axial (A), sagittal (B), and coronal (C) HRCT images showing a pure ground-glass nodule with 8-mm-diameter cystic airspace (type I), which displays a pure ground-glass wall component, the septum (white thick arrows), and vessels passing through the cystic airspace (white thin arrow). Photomicrograph (D) of the resected specimen showing one locule in the cystic airspace (asterisk, H&E, ×10). HRCT, high-resolution computed tomography; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
Figure 3 A 51-year-old man with a solid predominant invasive adenocarcinoma in the left lower lobe of the lung. Axial (A) HRCT image showing a solid nodule with 10-mm-diameter cystic airspace (type III), which shows a solid wall component, and the degree of thick wall proportion. Photomicrograph (B) of the frozen specimen showing one locule in the cystic airspace (asterisk, H&E, ×10). HRCT, high-resolution computed tomography; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
Figure 4 A 70-year-old woman with an acinar predominant invasive adenocarcinoma in the right lower lobe of the lung. Axial (A) and sagittal (B) HRCT images showing a mixed ground-glass nodule with multiple locules cystic airspace of mixed ground-glass wall components and the septum (white thin arrow). Photomicrograph of the resected specimen showing three locules in the cystic airspace (C, asterisks, H&E, ×10), which shows an inner wall with a lepidic growth pattern (black thick arrows) and fibrous tissue (black thin arrow) (D, H&E, ×100). HRCT, high-resolution computed tomography; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
Figure 5 A 57-year-old woman with an acinar predominant invasive adenocarcinoma in the left upper lobe of the lung. Axial HRCT images showing a solid nodule with 10-mm-diameter cystic airspace (A) of 9-mm-wall thickness (B). Photomicrograph of the frozen specimen showing one locule in the cystic airspace (C, asterisk, H&E, ×10), which shows an inner wall consisting of fragmentized tumor tissue (#), fibrous tissue surface covered with small amounts of tumor cells (black thick arrows) and fibrous tissue (black thin arrow) (D, H&E, ×100). HRCT, high-resolution computed tomography; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
Figure 6 A 60-year-old woman with a minimally invasive adenocarcinoma in the left lower lobe of the lung. Axial HRCT images showing a mixed ground-glass nodule with 9.37-mm-diameter cystic airspace (A), demonstrating 6-mm-wall thickness (B) and 326° thin-wall proportion. Photomicrograph of the resected specimen showing one locule in the cystic airspace (C, asterisk, H&E, ×10), which displays the inner wall consisting of fibrous tissue surface covered with small amounts of tumor cells (black thick arrows), fibrous tissue with mixed lymphatic, vascular, and inflammatory cells and bronchiolar epithelium and fibrous tissue (black thin arrows) (D, H&E, ×100). HRCT, high-resolution computed tomography; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
DiscussionOther Section
In this large cohort study, the prevalence of cystic airspace was 11.5% (176/1,525) on HRCT target scans in patients with LUADs ≤3 cm in diameter. Further, the wall component density, septa, cystic airspace diameter, wall thickness, and thin-wall proportion were found to be significant predictors of LUAD invasiveness. LCCAs were observed in 3.7% of cases in an I-ELCAP study, in 1% (30/2,954) of non-small cell lung cancer cases in a study by Fintelmann et al., and in 1.1% (117/10,835) of lung cancer cases in recent years (4,7,8). We found a higher prevalence of LACAs than previous studies, but our findings are consistent with other reports (11). The higher prevalence reported in the present study might be due to the LCCA pathology, wall thickness of the cystic airspace, and the diameters of the LUADs in the enrolled patients. In the above-mentioned studies, the most common pathological subtype was LUAD, which suggests that cystic airspace is more common in LUAD than other pathological subtypes (13). In the present study, only patients with LUADs were included, which resulted in a higher prevalence. Additionally, many previous studies only included patients with thin-walled cystic airspaces (13,14). However, in the present study, patients were included regardless of the thickness of the cystic airspace wall, which led to a higher prevalence of LACAs.
Previous studies of LCCAs have reported a stepwise process in which the cystic airspace first displays wall thickening and then transforms into a mural nodule, or in which the cystic airspace is replaced by a solid component. This indicates that cystic airspace is a part of lung cancer, and the incidence of cystic airspace will decrease as the lesion develops (4,8,9). Alternately, the higher prevalence of LACAs observed in the present study might be related to the enrolment criteria; all the patients had LUADs ≤3 cm in diameter, which is not too large, resulting in the cystic airspace being replaced by a solid mass. Pathologically, it may be that tumor cells develop in the alveolar wall and grow toward the bronchiole or tumor cells directly developed in the bronchiole first, and then form a check-valve due to the lack of cartilage in the bronchiole, and the accumulated gases enter the alveoli, which then ruptures and fuses into solitary cystic airspace. This cystic airspace may gradually increase as the inner pressure continually increases. Additionally, the tumor components grow irregularly and induce the asymmetric thickening of the wall (14). Finally, the cystic airspace may be totally replaced by a solid component, in which case, the prevalence of cystic airspaces would decrease.
The characteristics of cystic airspaces differ among clinical cases. Maki et al. used a three-type classification system to describe the CT morphologic features of LCCAs as follows: type I: a nodule or mass extruding from the wall of the cystic airspace; type II: a nodule or mass confined in the cystic airspace; and type III: soft-tissue density extending along the wall of the cystic airspace (15). Mascalchi et al. added another type to describe the morphological CT features of LCCAs; that is, type IV: soft-tissue density intermixed in clusters of cystic airspaces (9). The various subtypes can transform into each other, or can be replaced by solid lesions during follow-up. Subsequent studies considered additional factors in an effort to improve diagnosis. For example, a thin-walled cystic airspace indicates a lesion with a maximum wall thickness of 4 mm (14). The density of a nodule, mural nodule, and wall thickening on HRCT were also considered as diagnostic factors. Fintelmann et al. divided cystic airspaces into unilocular or multilocular (4). A mural nodule in the cystic airspace (type III), a part-solid/solid component in the wall, and an irregular inner surface in a cyst were shown to be independent risk factors for the moderately/poorly (M/P)-differentiated subtype (8,16). Type III LCCAs were shown to have the worst survival rate (8,16). However, these studies partially sought to categorize LCCA based on its appearance. Conversely, the present study explored the CT morphology of LACAs based on their qualitative features and included quantitative variables. We found that the wall component density, cystic airspace diameter, septa, wall thickness, and thin-wall proportion could be used to predict the invasiveness of LUAD.
The wall component density in the PLs mainly appeared as PGGNs, but increasingly appeared as MGGNs in the MIAs; no patient manifested a solid density of wall components in the PLs or MIAs. As invasiveness increased, the wall component density in the IACs appeared as either MGGNs or solid nodules on HRCT. The stepwise radiologic progression of LUAD, including the transformation of ground-glass opacity from non-solid nodules to part-solid nodules and then entire-solid nodules, is well known (17-20). Wall component density demonstrated a similar stepwise disease progression in the LACAs. Unlike those in the MIAs and IACs, cystic airspaces in PLs typically lacked septa. A microscopic observation by Tan et al. showed that septa in the cystic airspace on CT were composed of many types of tissue, including fibrous tissue produced by tumor cells, bronchus, or blood vessels (13). Jung et al. proposed a stepwise progression model of subsolid LACAs as follows: phase I, cystic airspaces appear in the middle of non-solid nodules; phase II, the cystic airspaces enlarge; phase III, a solid component emerges on the border of the cystic airspaces; and phase IV, the solid component gradually encompasses the cystic airspaces and becomes thicker, and ultimately, the cystic airspaces shrink or disappear (13,21). Thus, as cystic airspaces develop, the cystic airspace diameter can be used to diagnose LUAD invasiveness in some phases. We found that the cystic airspace diameter was larger in the IACs than PLs (6.5 vs. 3.7 mm).
We also found that the wall thickness of the cystic airspace was thicker in the IACs than the PLs and MIAs (11.8 vs. 6.8 mm; 11.8 vs. 8.3 mm). A previous study found that the thickness of the wall surrounding the cystic airspaces was associated with prognosis (22). Subsequent research found that only solid wall thickness was closely related to the recurrence for subsolid nodules (21). In relation to lung nodules, PL and MIA have a homologous prognosis (23). Similarly, we found insignificant differences in the wall thickness between the PLs and MIAs. As the wall thickness of the cystic airspace is frequently heterogeneous (13,21), we measured the thickest and the proportion of the thin-wall to further assess cystic airspace performance. The thin-wall proportion is much smaller in the IACs than the PLs and MIAs. This is consistent with a previous study that showed that patients with thin-walled LACAs had significantly longer overall survival than those with thick-walled LACAs in stage I (22).
This study found that observations of cystic airspaces are not uncommon in LUADs, and may be transiently observed as cancers develop. Further knowledge of the spectrum of cystic LUAD morphology is key to improving diagnostic accuracy and LUAD management (24). Our study also showed that specific guidelines need to be developed for the follow-up and staging of LACAs. Standardized protocols incorporating both traditional imaging techniques and advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analyses could enhance early detection and treatment planning. Regular follow-up with continuous HRCT scans, combined with AI analyses, could improve the accuracy of detecting changes in cystic airspaces, thereby aiding in the timely and precise staging of the disease.
This study had a number of limitations. First, no analysis was conducted using AI tools, which are increasingly being employed to enhance the predictive accuracy of CT features. Future studies should incorporate AI methodologies to provide more robust and precise assessments of LUAD characteristics. Second, this study was limited by its retrospective nature; thus, there might be some bias in the estimate of the overall prevalence of the LACAs. The nodules examined in this study were diagnosed by surgery and pathology; however, those diagnosed by biopsy or other methods were excluded, as were those that required follow-up. Additionally, the correlations between the HRCT findings for cystic airspace and pathology, such as the relationship between the wall pathological composition and HRCT features, were not examined individually. However, we examined the wall pathological composition of the tumor cells and fibrous tissues in several cases. We did not assess the LACA growth pattern and prognosis. Finally, this was a transversal study; thus, more continuous HRCT should be performed preoperatively and postoperatively.
ConclusionsOther Section
The prevalence and features of cystic airspaces on HRCT can be used to predict the invasiveness of LUADs ≤3 cm in diameter.
AcknowledgmentsOther Section
Funding: This study was supported by grants from
FootnoteOther Section
Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the STROBE reporting checklist. Available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-24-912/rc
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-24-912/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The Institutional Review Board of the Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, approved this retrospective, single-center study [No. KS(Y)21293]. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013), and the requirement of individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived.
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
ReferencesOther Section
Henschke CI, Boffetta P, Gorlova O, Yip R, Delancey JO, Foy M. Assessment of lung-cancer mortality reduction from CT Screening. Lung Cancer 2011;71:328-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong PA, Scholten ET, Nackaerts K, Heuvelmans MA, et al. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial. N Engl J Med 2020;382:503-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Scholten ET, Horeweg N, de Koning HJ, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M, Mali WP, de Jong PA. Computed tomographic characteristics of interval and post screen carcinomas in lung cancer screening. Eur Radiol 2015;25:81-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Fintelmann FJ, Brinkmann JK, Jeck WR, Troschel FM, Digumarthy SR, Mino-Kenudson M, Shepard JO. Lung Cancers Associated With Cystic Airspaces: Natural History, Pathologic Correlation, and Mutational Analysis. J Thorac Imaging 2017;32:176-88. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Austin JH, Müller NL, Friedman PJ, Hansell DM, Naidich DP, Remy-Jardin M, Webb WR, Zerhouni EA. Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. Radiology 1996;200:327-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 2008;246:697-722. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Farooqi AO, Cham M, Zhang L, Beasley MB, Austin JH, Miller A, Zulueta JJ, Roberts H, Enser C, Kao SJ, Thorsen MK, Smith JP, Libby DM, Yip R, Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI. Lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:781-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Shen Y, Xu X, Zhang Y, Li W, Dai J, Jiang S, Wu T, Cai H, Sihoe A, Shi J, Jiang G. Lung cancers associated with cystic airspaces: CT features and pathologic correlation. Lung Cancer 2019;135:110-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Mascalchi M, Attinà D, Bertelli E, Falchini M, Vella A, Pegna AL, Ambrosini V, Zompatori M. Lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2015;39:102-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Ma Z, Wang S, Zhu H, Li Y, Zhang Y. Comprehensive investigation of lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces: predictive value of morphology. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;62:ezac297. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Zhu H, Zhang L, Huang Z, Chen J, Sun L, Chen Y, Huang G, Chen Q, Yu H. Lung adenocarcinoma associated with cystic airspaces: Predictive value of CT features in assessing pathologic invasiveness. Eur J Radiol 2023;165:110947. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Bankier AA, MacMahon H, Colby T, Gevenois PA, Goo JM, Leung ANC, Lynch DA, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Tomiyama N, Travis WD, Verschakelen JA, White CS, Naidich DP. Fleischner Society: Glossary of Terms for Thoracic Imaging. Radiology 2024;310:e232558. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Tan Y, Gao J, Wu C, Zhao S, Yu J, Zhu R, Zhang Q, Wu G, Xue X, Wu J. CT Characteristics and Pathologic Basis of Solitary Cystic Lung Cancer. Radiology 2019;291:495-501. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Xue X, Wang P, Xue Q, Wang N, Zhang L, Sun J, Wang K, Yang B, Wang J. Comparative study of solitary thin-walled cavity lung cancer with computed tomography and pathological findings. Lung Cancer 2012;78:45-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Maki D, Takahashi M, Murata K, Sawai S, Fujino S, Inoue S. Computed tomography appearances of bronchogenic carcinoma associated with bullous lung disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:447-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Shen Y, Zhang Y, Guo Y, Li W, Huang Y, Wu T, Jiang G, Dai J. Prognosis of lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces: A propensity score matching analysis. Lung Cancer 2021;159:111-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Zhang Y, Qiang JW, Ye JD, Ye XD, Zhang J. High resolution CT in differentiating minimally invasive component in early lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 2014;84:236-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Zhang Y, Shen Y, Qiang JW, Ye JD, Zhang J, Zhao RY. HRCT features distinguishing pre-invasive from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas appearing as ground-glass nodules. Eur Radiol 2016;26:2921-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Min JH, Lee HY, Lee KS, Han J, Park K, Ahn MJ, Lee SJ. Stepwise evolution from a focal pure pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodule into an invasive lung adenocarcinoma: an observation for more than 10 years. Lung Cancer 2010;69:123-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Kato T, Iwano S, Hanamatsu Y, Nakaguro M, Emoto R, Okado S, Sato K, Noritake O, Nakanishi K, Kadomatsu Y, Ueno H, Ozeki N, Nakamura S, Fukumoto K, Takeuchi T, Karube K, Matsui S, Chen-Yoshikawa TF. Prognostic impact of highly solid component in early-stage solid lung adenocarcinoma. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023;13:5641-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Jung W, Cho S, Yum S, Chung JH, Lee KW, Kim K, Lee CT, Jheon S. Stepwise Disease Progression Model of Subsolid Lung Adenocarcinoma with Cystic Airspaces. Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27:4394-403. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Watanabe Y, Kusumoto M, Yoshida A, Shiraishi K, Suzuki K, Watanabe SI, Tsuta K. Cavity Wall Thickness in Solitary Cavitary Lung Adenocarcinomas Is a Prognostic Indicator. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102:1863-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Russell PA, Wainer Z, Wright GM, Daniels M, Conron M, Williams RA. Does lung adenocarcinoma subtype predict patient survival? A clinicopathologic study based on the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society international multidisciplinary lung adenocarcinoma classification. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:1496-504. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Byrne D, English JC, Atkar-Khattra S, Lam S, Yee J, Myers R, Bilawich AM, Mayo JR, Mets OM. Cystic Primary Lung Cancer: Evolution of Computed Tomography Imaging Morphology Over Time. J Thorac Imaging 2021;36:373-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Zhang Y, Ding BW, Wang LN, Ma WL, Zhu L, Chen QH, Yu H. Using CT features of cystic airspace to predict lung adenocarcinoma invasiveness. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2024;14(10):7265-7278. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-912
感谢QIMS杂志授权转载!
原文链接:
https://qims.amegroups.org/article/view/129301/html
About the Journal
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Aims and Scope
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery (QIMS, Quant Imaging Med Surg, Print ISSN 2223-4292; Online ISSN 2223-4306) publishes peer-reviewed original reports and reviews in medical imaging, including X-ray, ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy, nuclear medicine and related modalities, and their application in medicine and surgery. While focus is on clinical investigations, papers on medical physics, image processing, or biological studies which have apparent clinical relevance are also published. This journal encourages authors to look at the medical images from a quantitative angle. This journal also publishes important topics on imaging-based epidemiology, and debates on research methodology, medical ethics, and medical training. Descriptive radiological studies of high clinical importance are published as well.
QIMS is an open-access, international peer-reviewed journal, published by AME Publishing Company. It is published quarterly (Dec. 2011- Dec. 2012), bimonthly (Feb. 2013 - Feb 2018), monthly (Mar. 2018 - ) and openly distributed worldwide.
QIMS is indexed in PubMed/PubMed Central, Scopus, Web of Science [Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)]. The latest impact factor is: 2.9.
Indexing
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery is indexed and covered by
Web of Science [Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)]
PubMed
PubMed Central (PMC)
Google Scholar
Scopus
Information for Authors
QIMS is a member of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and it follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)'s guidelines and the ICMJE recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journal.
Manuscripts submitted must be the original work of the author(s) and must not be published previously or under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Manuscripts Turnaround Time
First Editorial Decision: 3-5 days
Peer review: 1-2 months
Revision time: 2-4 weeks
Publication Ahead of Print: within 1 month after being accepted
Formal publication: within 1-3 months after being accepted. Original Articles are listed as priority.
QIMS’s position on case reports and review articles.
QIMS welcomes case reports where quantitative imaging played a role for diagnosis and/or treatment; also welcome first time realization (in animals or in human subjects) of a new imaging technique. These case reports are usually written a concise and short letter format (see <https://qims.amegroups.com/>) for example. Case reports of particular clinical importance are also published in a longer format; for these cases we expect important pathophysiological, diagnostic, therapeutic implications. We do not publish case report only because of the rarity of the cases. Note, although we believer reporting case materials is important for the advancement of medicine. The space reserved for case report remains limited for each issue. The decision to publish or not publish a case material submission can sometimes depend on the available space of the journal.
QIMS welcomes reviews and comments on published papers. Review papers should contain authors’ analytical appraisal of published papers and personal viewpoints, instead of a mere aggregation of published abstracts.
We expect review papers are in three forms, 1) expert reviews, usually published in editorial format, provide authors’ own insights and perspective; 2) systematic review; 3) educational reviews, including pictorial reviews. Systematic reviews (maybe narrative in writing but critical in nature) are particularly welcomed.
Publication Schedule
Published quarterly from Dec. 2011 to Dec. 2012 and bimonthly from Feb. 2013 to Feb 2018, QIMS now follows a monthly publication model.
Open Access Statement
This journal is a peer reviewed, open access journal. All content of the journal is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). All articles published open access will be immediately and permanently free for all to read, download, copy and distribute as defined by the applied license.
Free access and usage
Permitted third party reuse is defined by the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. This license allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided:
this is not done for commercial purposes and further does not permit distribution of the Article if it is changed or edited in any way.
the user gives appropriate credit (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI) and provides a link to the license but not in an any way implying that the licensor is endorsing the user or the use of the work.
no derivatives including remix, transform, or build upon the material was allowed for distribution.
The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright
For open access publishing, this journal uses an exclusive licensing agreement. Authors will transfer copyright to QIMS, but will have the right to share their article in the same way permitted to third parties under the relevant user license, as well as certain scholarly usage rights.
For any inquiry/special circumstance on the copyright, commercial usage or adaptation of QIMS articles, please contact: permissions@amegroups.com
For reprint order, please contact: sales@amegroups.com
Support for Authors to Comply with Funding Body Mandates
We work with authors of research articles supported by funding bodies with open access mandates to ensure that authors can meet their funders’ requirements for public access to research results.
In addition, we offer further support for authors who are required to comply with funding body mandates, including but not limited to:
All articles published open access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read, download, copy and distribute. If a specific open access license is needed, please contact the editorial office for confirmation before submission. Example of statements in a published article: https://jgo.amegroups.org/article/view/76355/html.
No copyright is claimed for any work of the U.S. government. Example of statements in published articles: https://actr.amegroups.org/article/view/8875; https://med.amegroups.org/article/view/8358/html.
Editorial Office
Email: qims@amepc.org
Publisher Information
QIMS is published by AME Publishing Company.
Addresses:
Hong Kong branch office: Flat/RM C 16F, Kings Wing Plaza 1, NO. 3 on Kwan Street, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, China.
Singapore branch office: Pico Creative Centre, 20 Kallang Ave #03-08, 339411 Singapore, Singapore.
Updated on July 19, 2024
感谢QIMS授权转载!
观点:王毅翔等——新冠肺炎CT检查的临床意义未定,尽可能避免,武汉/湖北除外!
SCI之窗(005)—杜二珠、王毅翔等:调整X 线焦点投照位置以提高正位胸片对椎体骨质疏松性压缩变形的检出率
王毅翔 等:肝脏弥散加权磁共振ADC及IVIM定量 : 现有的困难及部分解决方法
SCI之窗(006)—王毅翔等:老年华人女性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的发病率及严重程度远低于欧美人群
SCI之窗(011):对东亚男女性老年人修正1994WHO T-值定义骨质疏松的阈值以使其与东亚人群终生脆性骨折的风险一致
QIMS之窗(006):18F-FDG-PET/CT 在结核病诊断及疗效评估中的价值
QIMS之窗(007):腹壁肿瘤及肿瘤样病变的CT及MRI表现
QIMS之窗(008):结合非强化磁共振血管造影、血流定量及灌注成像评估将发生的再次中风
QIMS之窗(009):颅内动脉瘤的神经影像学:考虑瘤体大小以外的解剖及血流动力学因素
QIMS之窗(010):髓鞘脂的UTE (超短回波时间) 磁共振成像:技术发展及挑战
QIMS之窗(011):新冠患者CT测量得到的肺血管指数及临床预后间的关系
QIMS之窗 (012): 双能CT肺血管造影显示新冠肺炎的微血管病变
QIMS之窗 (013): 胸部平片用于严重新冠病的临床价值
QIMS之窗 (014): 活动性肺结核的几种不典型CT表现及机制
QIMS之窗 (015): 类风湿关节炎患者高分辨率外周定量CT评估掌指关节3维关节间隙宽度的共识方法
QIMS之窗 (016): 骨质疏松症的影像学及骨密度诊断: 中国专家共识(英文版)
QIMS之窗 (017): 新冠肺炎的一种新CT征象: 拱形桥征
QIMS之窗 (018): 老年男性X线骨质疏松性椎体骨折综述:聚焦于男女性别间差异
QIMS之窗 (022): 双能CT区分甲状腺乳头状癌患者小于0.5 cm的转移性和非转移性淋巴结
QIMS之窗 (023): 正位胸片及腹部正位平片上识别骨质疏松性椎体压缩变形: 图文综述
QIMS之窗 (024): 基于人工智能的血管抑制技术应用于肺癌筛查中半实性小结节检测
QIMS之窗 (026): 磁共振成像显示前胫腓韧带损伤与踝关节状态及其肌腱、韧带的关系
QIMS之窗 (027): 腹主动脉瘤的CT测量:非标准化测量的临床后果及多平面重建的重要性
QIMS之窗 (028): 人工智能辅助诊断减少急诊全身CT的胸部病变漏诊
QIMS之窗 (029): 性别各异的肝脏衰老过程与磁共振成像
QIMS之窗 (030): 今天的放射科医生遇到明天的人工智能: 许诺、陷阱和无限的潜力
QIMS之窗 (032): 通过多模态融合成像三维定量评估心肌梗死: 方法学、验证和初步临床应用
QIMS之窗 (033): 门脉高压的侧枝循环:解剖及临床相关性
QIMS之窗 (034):医学图像分析应用中计算机视觉和人工智能的新进展
QIMS之窗 (035):大动脉壁的应力分布对动脉粥样硬化的影响
QIMS之窗 (036): 人工智能计算机辅助诊断系统评估肺癌、转移瘤和良性病变的预测准确性
QIMS之窗 (037):4D 血流 MRI 在心血管疾病的临床应用:现状和未来展望
QIMS之窗 (038): 含碘造影剂的交叉反应:我们需要关注吗?
QIMS之窗 (039): 全脑分析显示正常中青年深部灰质和大脑皮层年龄相关性磁敏感率变化
QIMS之窗 (040): 颈动脉支架术治疗后新发缺血性脑病灶与颈动脉钙化环壁分布程度相关
QIMS之窗 (041): 先进脑磁共振技术转化为临床实践:多模态磁共振在传统临床条件下区分痴呆亚型
QIMS之窗 (042): 3,557 名感染 COVID-19 儿童的CT扫描表现: 系统性综述
QIMS之窗 (043): 肩关节不稳影像学图文综述QIMS之窗 (044): 多排计算机断层扫描评估肝门部胆管癌血管受累
QIMS之窗 (045): 多发性骨髓瘤患者肿瘤负荷的全身磁共振成像定量评估: 与预后生物标志物的相关性
QIMS之窗 (046): 虚拟或真实: 肾上腺肿瘤的活体样电影模式重建
QIMS之窗 (047): 血池和肝脏PET 标准化摄取值的年龄相关变化: 对 2526 名患者长达十年的回顾性研究结果
QIMS之窗 (048): 辨认骨质疏松性椎体终板及皮质骨折: 图文综述
QIMS之窗 (049): 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后有症状患者心肌灌注受损的临床和影像预测因素:动态CT心肌灌注成像的表现
QIMS之窗 (050): 定量磁共振 神经成像用于评估周围神经和神经丛损伤: 图文综述
QIMS之窗 (051): 儿童颈部良恶性肿块的影像学诊断: 图文综述
QIMS之窗 (052): CT肺结节半自动分割 的常规方法和深度学习方法的比较评估
QIMS之窗 (053): 通过ICC评估放射组学特征的可靠性: 系统性综述
QIMS之窗 (054): 550 例小儿脑肿瘤定性 MRI 的诊断准确性:评估计算时代的临床实践
QIMS之窗 (055): 年龄和吸烟对中国健康男性肺血管容积的影响 : 低剂量CT定量测量
QIMS之窗 (056): 通过薄层CT扫描区分肺部部分实性结节的良恶性
QIMS之窗 (057): 不同阶段高血压患者脑白质变化、高血压病程、年龄与脑微出血有关
QIMS之窗 (058): 乳动脉钙化作为动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的指标:冠状动脉CT评分系统和颈动脉内中膜厚度的比较分析
QIMS之窗 (059): 老年华人骨质疏松性骨折的发生率不到欧美人群的一半
QIMS之窗 (060): 基于简化时序方案的黑血延时钆增强心脏磁共振成像用于心肌瘢痕检测:检查怀疑冠状动脉疾病患者的单中心经验
QIMS之窗 (061): 弥漫性肝病的 CT 和 MR: 多参数预测建模算法帮助肝实质分类
QIMS之窗 (062): 心脏磁共振评价川崎病患儿心肌综合收缩力: 大型单中心研究
QIMS之窗 (063): 胸腰脊柱骨折的分类: 定量影像学的作用
QIMS之窗 (064): 不规则骨及扁平骨的骨肉瘤: 112例患者的临床及影像学特征
QIMS之窗 (065): “华人脊椎更健康”: MrOS (Hong Kong)和 MsOS(Hong Kong) 研究进展
QIMS之窗 (066): 低球管电压方案CT平描无创诊断肝脂肪
QIMS之窗 (067): 全身磁共振成像在成人淋巴瘤患者分期中的诊断性能—系统综述和荟萃分析
QIMS之窗 (069): 使用放射组学和组合机器学习对帕金森病进展进行纵向聚类分析和预测
QIMS之窗 (070): 直肠内超声和MRI使用直肠系膜浸润深度5mm为截止点对T3直肠癌进行术前亚分类的一致性和存活的意义
QIMS之窗 (071): 肺结节的体积分析:减少基于直径的体积计算和体素计数方法之间的差异
QIMS之窗 (072):深度学习图像重建可降低射线剂量成像的同时保持图像质量:增强腹部CT扫描深度学习重建与混合迭代重建的比较
QIMS之窗 (073): 严重钙化冠状动脉中隐藏的不稳定的斑块
QIMS之窗 (074): 放射组学和混合机器学习对帕金森病进展的纵向聚类分析和预测
QIMS之窗 (075): 冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病人心血管磁共振成像随访应力分析和晚期钆增强的量化
QIMS之窗 (076): 平扫光谱CT有效原子序数图识别无钙化动脉粥样硬化斑块的临床可行性初步研究
QIMS之窗 (077): 7T磁共振神经影像学: 图文综述QIMS之窗 (078): MRI特征区分结直肠肝转移瘤的组织病理学生长模式
QIMS之窗 (079): 弱监督学习使用弥散加权成像检出急性缺血性中风和出血性梗塞病变的能力
QIMS之窗 (080): 无造影强化光谱CT有效原子序数图识别无钙化动脉粥样硬化斑块:临床可行性初步研究
QIMS之窗 (081): ImageJ定量测量超微血管成像与造影增强超声定量测量对于肝脏转移瘤检查的比较: 初步研究结果
QIMS之窗 (082): 剪切波弹性成像显示: 无论先前抗病毒治疗如何, 慢性戊型肝炎患者肝组织硬度均升高
QIMS之窗 (083): 磁共振与CT在脊柱骨病变中的价值
QIMS之窗 (084): 一种简化评分方案以提高MRI乳房成像报告/数据系统的诊断准确性
QIMS之窗 (085): 晚年抑郁症进展与 MRI 定量磁敏感性测量脑铁沉积的变化
QIMS之窗 (086): 吸烟通过调节黑质纹状体通路中铁沉积与临床症状之间的相互作用对帕金森病起到保护作用
QIMS之窗 (087): 急性肺栓塞后血栓栓塞持续存在的临床和影像学危险因素
QIMS之窗 (088): 在老年女性侧位胸片上自动检出椎体压缩性骨折的软件: Ofeye 1.0
QIMS之窗 (089): 脑血流与脑白质高信号进展之间的关联:一项基于社区成年人的纵向队列研究
QIMS之窗 (090): 基于骨密度诊断老年华人骨质疏松症发病率和定义骨质疏松症的临界T值
QIMS之窗 (091): 臂丛神经磁共振束成像: 循序渐进的步骤
QIMS之窗 (092): 造血病患者通过磁共振模块化报告评估骨髓
QIMS之窗 (093): 使用无造影剂和无触发的弛豫增强血管造影 (REACT) 评估急性缺血性中风的近端颈内动脉狭窄
QIMS之窗 (094): 用于预测自发性脑出血后不良预后和 30 天死亡率的临床-放射组学列线图
QIMS之窗 (095): 深度学习在超声成像识别乳腺导管原位癌和微浸润中的应用
QIMS之窗 (096): 磁共振灌注成像区分胶质瘤复发与假性恶化:系统性综述、荟萃分析及荟萃回归
QIMS之窗 (097): 锥形束 CT 引导微波消融治疗肝穹窿下肝细胞癌:回顾性病例对照研究
QIMS之窗 (098): 阿尔茨海默病患者皮质铁积累与认知和脑萎缩的关系
QIMS之窗 (099): 放射组学机器学习模型使用多样性的MRI数据集检出有临床意义前列腺癌的性能不均一性
QIMS之窗 (100): 一种机器学习方法结合多个磁共振弥散散模型来区分低级别和高级别成人胶质瘤
QIMS之窗 (101): MRPD脂肪分数 (MRI-PDFF)、MRS 和两种组织病理学方法(AI与病理医生)量化脂肪肝
QIMS之窗 (102): 占位性心脏病患者的诊断和生存分析:一项为期10年的单中心回顾性研究
QIMS之窗 (103): Ferumoxytol增强4DMR多相稳态成像在先心病中的应用:2D和3D软件平台评估心室容积和功能
QIMS之窗 (104): 磁共振弹性成像对肝细胞癌肝切除术后肝再生的术前评价
QIMS之窗 (105): 使用定量时间-强度曲线比较炎症性甲状腺结节和甲状腺乳头状癌的超声造影特征:倾向评分匹配分析
QIMS之窗 (106): 口服泡腾剂改善磁共振胰胆管造影 (MRCP)
QIMS之窗 (107): 钆磁共振成像造影剂引起的弛豫率改变显示阿尔茨海默病患者微血管形态变化
QIMS之窗 (108): 轻链心肌淀粉样变性患者左心室心肌做功指数和短期预后:一项回顾性队列研究
QIMS之窗 (109): 基于MR放射组学的机器学习对高级别胶质瘤患者疾病进展的预测价值
QIMS之窗 (110): 高分辨率T2加权MRI与组织病理学集合分析显示其在食管癌分期中的意义
QIMS之窗 (111): 使用多参数磁共振成像和波谱预测放射治疗后前列腺癌的复发: 评估治疗前成像的预后因素
QIMS之窗 (112):双层能谱探测器CT参数提高肺腺癌分级诊断效率
QIMS之窗 (113): 弥散加权T2图谱在预测头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者组织学肿瘤分级中的应用
QIMS之窗 (114): 老年女性椎体高度下降不到 20% 的骨质疏松样椎体骨折与进一步椎体骨折风险增加有关:18年随访结果
QIMS之窗 (115): 膝关节周围巨细胞瘤和软骨母细胞瘤的影像学:99例回顾性分析
QIMS之窗 (116): 胸部CT显示分枝杆菌感染空洞:临床意义和基于深度学习的量化自动检测
QIMS之窗 (117): 基于人工智能的甲状腺结节筛查自动诊断系统的统计优化策略评估和临床评价
QIMS之窗 (118): 基于四维血流磁共振成像的弯曲大脑中动脉壁切应力的分布和区域变化
QIMS之窗 (119): 我们最近关于老年男性和女性流行性骨质疏松性椎体骨折X线诊断的循证工作总结
QIMS之窗 (120): 许莫氏结节与流行性骨质疏松性椎体骨折和低骨密度有关:一项基于老年男性和女性社区人群的胸椎MRI研究
QIMS之窗 (121): 心肌梗死后射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者: 心肌磁共振(MR)组织追踪研究
QIMS之窗 (122): 使用 人工智能辅助压缩传感心脏黑血 T2 加权成像:患者队列研究
QIMS之窗 (123): 整合式18F-FDG PET/MR全身扫描机局部增强扫描在胰腺腺癌术前分期及可切除性评估中的价值
QIMS之窗 (124): 放射组学预测胶质瘤异柠檬酸 脱氢酶基因突变的多中心研究
QIMS之窗 (125): CT与组织病理学对评估冠状动脉钙化的敏感性和相关性的比较
QIMS之窗 (126): 磁敏感加权成像鉴别良恶性门静脉血栓的价值
QIMS之窗 (127): 乳腺癌的超声诊断深度学习模型:超声与临床因素的整合
QIMS之窗 (128): 钆塞酸增强磁共振成像肝胆期成像的优化:叙述性综述
QIMS之窗 (130): 退行性颈椎病患者检出偶发甲状腺结节:一项回顾性 MRI 研究
QIMS之窗 (131):主要由发育原因引起的许莫氏结节和主要由后天原因引起的许莫氏结节:两个相关但不同的表现
QIMS之窗 (132):肱骨头囊性病变: 磁共振成像图文综述
QIMS之窗 (133):高分辨率小视场弥散加权磁共振成像在宫颈癌诊断中的应用
QIMS之窗 (135):深度学习辅助放射平片对膝关节关节炎分级:多角度X线片与先验知识的作用
QIMS之窗 (136): Angio-CT 影像学生物标志预测肝细胞癌经动脉化疗栓塞的疗效
QIMS之窗 (137):术前低放射剂量CT引导下肺结节定位
QIMS之窗 (138):超声造影在乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结评估和标测中的应用
QIMS之窗 (140):反转恢复超短回波时间 (IR-UTE) 磁共振对脑白质病变的临床评估
QIMS之窗 (141): 层厚对基于深度学习的冠状动脉钙自动评分软件性能的影响
QIMS之窗 (142):支气管内超声弹性成像鉴别肺门纵隔淋巴结良恶性:回顾性研究
QIMS之窗 (143):高血压和肥胖对左心房时相功能的交互作用:三维超声心动图研究
QIMS之窗 (144):超声造影在乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结评估和标测中的应用
QIMS之窗 (145):基于K-means层级体素聚类的快速高信噪比CEST量化方法
QIMS之窗 (146):常规临床多排CT扫描自动分割机会性评估椎体骨密度和纹理特征的长期可重复性
QIMS之窗 (147):基于人工智能的CT 扫描特征直方图分析预测毛玻璃结节的侵袭性
QIMS之窗 (148):基于心脏CTA图像与超声心动图的深度监督8层residual U-Net计算左心室射血分数
QIMS之窗 (149): 高度实性成分对早期实性肺腺癌的预后影响
QIMS之窗 (150):只在磁共振发现的可疑乳腺病变: 定量表观弥散系数有额外的临床价值吗 ?
QIMS之窗 (151): 人工智能与放射科医生在CT图像骨折诊断准确性方面的比较: 多维度、多部位分析
QIMS之窗 (152): 超声剪切波速检测人群晚期肝纤维化
QIMS之窗 (153):使用Gd-EOB-DTPA增强MR结合血清标志物在乙肝病毒高危患者中区分肿块型肝内胆管癌和非典型HCC
QIMS之窗 (154):术前超声预测甲状腺癌患者喉返神经侵犯
QIMS之窗 (155): T2 弛豫时间对 MRI 表观扩散系数 (ADC) 量化的影响及其潜在的临床意义
QIMS之窗 (156): 成人血液系统恶性肿瘤的急性病变神经放射学:图文综述
QIMS之窗 (157): 老年休闲运动最常见的15种肌肉骨骼损伤: 图文综述
QIMS之窗 (158): T2弛豫时间与磁共振成像表观弥散系数 (ADC) 之间的三相关系
QIMS之窗 (159): T2弛豫时间在解释肌肉骨骼结构MRI表观弥散系数(ADC)的意义
QIMS之窗 (160): 膝骨关节炎的影像学:多模式诊断方法综述
QIMS之窗 (161): 超高场 7T MRI 在帕金森病中准备用于临床了吗?—叙述性综述
QIMS之窗 (162): 碘造影剂在CT结构化RADS中的作用——叙述性综述
QIMS之窗 (163): 医学图像分割中的Transformers: 叙述性综述
QIMS之窗 (164): 肝癌相对于肝组织的长T2导致常规IVIM成像肝癌灌注分数被低估
QIMS之窗 (165): 基于深度学习的多模态肿瘤分割方法: 叙述性综述
QIMS之窗 (167): 基于双能CT的新型生物标志物用于结直肠癌手术后极早期远处转移的风险分层
QIMS之窗 (168): ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者心肌内出血的心脏磁共振成像检测:磁敏感加权成像与T1/T2像素图技术的比较
QIMS之窗 (169): TW3人工智能骨龄评估系统的验证:一项前瞻性、多中心、确认性研究
QIMS之窗 (170): 开发和验证深度学习模型用于髋关节前后位和侧位X线片检测无移位的股骨颈骨折
QIMS之窗 (171): 开滦研究中眼球血管宽度与认知能力下降和脑小血管病负担的关系
QIMS之窗 (172): 终板炎性矮椎(Endplatitis short vertebrae)
QIMS之窗 (173): DDVD像素图的潜在广泛临床应用
QIMS之窗 (174): 弥散性甲状腺病变中超声低回声特点及原理
QIMS之窗 (175): 不同发育状态及成长时期儿童青少年的手部骨骼特征
QIMS之窗 (176): 不同肌肉测量技术在诊断肌肉减少症中的一致性:系统性综述及荟萃分析
QIMS之窗 (177): 用于冠状动脉狭窄功能评估的冠状动脉树描述和病变评估 (CatLet) 评分:与压力线FFR的比较
QIMS之窗 (178): 使用 Sonazoid 的CEUS LI-RADS诊断肝细胞癌的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析
QIMS之窗 (179): 更多证据支持东亚老年女性骨质疏松症QCT腰椎BMD诊断临界点值应该低于欧裔人
QIMS之窗 (180): 相对于无肿瘤直肠壁,直肠癌的血液灌注更高:通过一种新的影像学生物标志物DDVD进行量化
QIMS之窗 (181): 人工智能在超声图像上解释甲状腺结节的诊断性能:一项多中心回顾性研究
QIMS之窗 (182): 先天许莫氏结节有软骨终板完全覆盖及其在许莫氏结节基于病因学分类的意义
QIMS之窗 (183): 合成磁共振成像在预测乳腺癌前哨淋巴结的额外价值
QIMS之窗 (184): 通过体积倍增时间预测早期肺腺癌生长导致分期改变
QIMS之窗 (185): 对比增强盆腔MRI用于预测粘液性直肠癌的治疗反应
QIMS之窗 (186): 探讨骨质疏松症和骨折风险中椎旁肌肉与骨骼健康之间的相互作用:CT和MRI研究全面文献综述
QIMS之窗 (187): 心动周期对双层计算机断层扫描心肌细胞外体积分数测量的影响
QIMS之窗 (188): 帕金森病和多系统萎缩皮质下铁沉积的定量磁敏感图:临床相关性和诊断意义
QIMS之窗 (189): 0~14岁儿童脑18氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描正常对照模型的建立及变化规律分析
QIMS之窗 (190): 急性缺血性卒中后早期神经功能恶化的多模态成像评估
QIMS之窗 (192): 良性甲状腺结节的分期:原理和超声征象
QIMS之窗 (193): 独立评估5款人工智能软件检测胸片肺结节的准确性
QIMS之窗 (194): 合成磁共振成像在前列腺癌侵袭性诊断和评估中的价值
QIMS之窗 (195): 对比增强超声和高分辨率磁共振在评估组织学定义的易破裂颈动脉斑块的诊断性能比较:系统文献综述和荟萃分析
QIMS 之窗(195):与南方华人相比,东南亚人群脊柱退变更少;这提示来自温暖地区的人群呈现内在更加健康的脊柱
QIMS之窗 (197): 乳腺超声医生使用可解释 ChatGPT 辅助诊断的初步实验
QIMS之窗 (198): 预测脑小血管疾病患者白质高信号进展和认知能力下降:基于磁共振的生境分析
QIMS之窗 (199): 人工智能测量肺结节用于确定肿瘤性磨玻璃结节的侵袭性