众所周知，IB不仅难在学科设置上，论文的写作同样是让无数IBer感到困难的一部分，稍有不慎还会被认为是AI创作:
论文被判“AI创作”，到手的藤校offer没了
明明是原创文章，为什么还会被判为AI创作？
……
而这段时间，不少同学应该正忙着进行EE的改稿，这里小编还是要提醒大家，使用AI工具写作是万万不可取的，不少前车之鉴都印证着这样的说法。如何有效避免原创论文被判为AI创作，我们一起来讨论一下👇
01
IBO的具体相关规定
虽然IBO官方允许学生使用AI工具，但这并不代表IBO鼓励学生滥用AI，在官方出具的《学术诚信政策》中有比较明确的规定：
● 如果使用人工智能工具生成文本（或任何其他作品），必须清楚的标注出来，并添加到参考目录中；
● 应该使用学校规定的引用格式，并且包含给到AI工具的指令及AI生成文本的日期；
● 这也适用于从人工智能工具中获得的除了文本之外的其他任何材料，例如图像。
关于一旦发现违规使用AI，被判定抄袭或AI创作之后的处罚，也有比较明确的案例展示和说明：
滑动查看完整内容
简单来说，常见的后果就是取消该项的分数（如TOK/EE/IA），并且因此没有完成评估的所有部分，无法正常获得DP文凭。如果被判定为“抄袭”或“学术不端”，那么学生的大学录取也非常危险，到手的offer很有可能会被撤回。
02
被“误判”我们能做些什么？
很多AI检测工具本身也存在很大的bug，尤其是对于非英语母语的学生写的论文，很容易被判定为“AI创作”。因此，我们要养成良好的习惯，在写作的过程当中留下过程性的记录和证据，万一不行被误判，可以作为申诉的材料：
● 养成记录存档的习惯，查资料、数据的时候留下痕迹，和老师讨论内容创作、修改的想法等也可以留下过程性的记录，便于证明自己一步步原创的真实性；
● 严格按照IBO的规定，在使用AI工具的内容处做好标识和引用说明；
● 进一步加深、加强对于自己研究的课题或论文主题的理解和认识，理清逻辑和思路，不要让自己处在一个一知半解的状态，即便需要引用AI工具中获得的内容，也不能单纯只是一个东拼西凑的裁缝，而是为你自己原创的脉络去填充部分内容；
● 最后，多和老师沟通交流，因为在《学术诚信政策》中也有写明：教师确认最终作品的质量符合他们对学生能力的预期，教师最了解学生的能力，也最清楚某件作品是否出自该学生之手。
03
AI就一定靠谱吗？
说了这么多，可能还有不少学生有投机取巧的想法。人工智能究竟靠不靠谱？AI写的就真的比我们自己写的好吗？
橡沐IB教研组导师们为了解答这一问题，将GPT生成答案与橡沐在读学生们的样本进行对比，通过IB官方的评分标准判断谁更胜一筹。以一道IB经济大题为例：
📋 题目 📋
Evaluate the use of carbon taxes to reduce threats to sustainability. Write more than 500 words.
💻 ChatGPT 💻
（滑动查看完整内容）
The use of carbon taxes to reduce threats to sustainability is a complex but highly effective approach that offers numerous advantages to both industry and the environment. Carbon taxes are taxes imposed on the production, distribution, or consumption of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas. The purpose of such taxes is to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, which are linked to global climate change. Carbon taxes are an effective tool to encourage businesses to reach sustainability targets by reducing their carbon emissions. Carbon taxes can provide an incentive for businesses to become more energy efficient, reduce their reliance on fossil fuels, and invest in renewable energy.
The implementation of a carbon tax is a cost-effective alternative to more direct measures to reduce emissions, such as regulations or subsidies. Carbon taxes provide an economically efficient way to allow market forces to adjust resource allocation and production decisions to reach desired environmental goals. Carbon taxes can also be used to raise public revenues, making them an attractive source of funds for governments.
In terms of sustainability, carbon taxes can be instrumental in motivating industry to reduce emissions at a rate that is both cost effective and equitable. It provides a way to reduce emissions without the heavy burden of large-scale regulations, which can be expensive and complex to administer. Carbon taxes also incentivize more energy efficient production, which can reduce environmental damage. By shifting production away from fossil fuels to renewable sources of energy, carbon taxes can reduce air and water pollution and ultimately lead to improved sustainability.
Carbon taxes also have the potential to reduce inequality. By levying taxes on higher-income households, governments can reinvest those funds into clean energy and public services that benefit low- and middle-income groups. Carbon taxes can also reduce the tax burden for lower-income households, freeing up funds for other uses.
Despite their advantages, there are drawbacks to the use of carbon taxes. Carbon taxes can have a negative impact on certain industries and communities, particularly those that rely on income from the production of fossil fuels. Carbon taxes can also be regressive, disproportionately affecting certain segments of the population. Additionally, depending on how a tax is structured, businesses may pass on the cost of the tax to consumers, resulting in higher energy costs for households and businesses alike.
Though carbon taxes have their benefits and drawbacks, they can be a powerful tool in the global effort to reduce emissions and ensure a more sustainable future. By providing incentives for renewable energy, reducing the tax burden on lower-income households, and promoting energy efficiency, carbon taxes can have a transformative effect on global sustainability. The key lies in finding the right mix of policies to ensure that the cost of emissions is reflected in the price of goods and services. By striking this balance, governments and businesses around the world can take advantage of the significant potential of carbon taxes to reduce threats to sustainability.
💬 导师解读 💬
✅ ChatGPT产出文章优点
对carbon tax的定义明确，对于carbon tax 的用途阐述清晰;
对carbon tax imposition的好处描述较为全面。
❌ ChatGPT产出文章不足
对carbon tax imposition的好处归纳仍有不足。比如，收carbon tax还有很多其他的pros，比如it can raise tax revenue for government, thus, government have more funds to do
other things that are beneficial for the society. For instance, providing a better health care service, etc. 同时，carbon tax还有很多其他的pros，比如，carbon tax makes energy price more predictable; they are easy to design and implement; they can be applied to all users of fossil fuels, etc.
对carbon tax imposition的劣势归纳不完整。除文章中所提到的cons外，carbon tax还有很多其他的cons，比如，carbon taxes face political pressures to set too low; they cannot target a particular level of caron reduction, etc.
答案缺少real life example和evaluation；没有介绍为什么要impose carbon tax，而我们学生在回答中，可以讨论到经济中的externality，来解释carbon tax的作用和重要性。
VS总结
总的来说，Chat GPT生成的答案虽然精确且快速，它可以根据大量的信息生成逻辑和语法正确的文本。
但是，Chat GPT毕竟是人工智能语言模型，是一种计算机程序，没有人类所拥有的思维和情感，所以它生成的答案缺乏人类所具备的创造力，以及人类的文化、背景和经验，它的回答很少会提及现实生活中的范例。而我们自己写的文章却可以和现实生活很好的联系起来，会更加完整且生动。
除此之外，还有数学IA、英语语言文学分析性题目等方面的“人机pk”，感兴趣的同学可以点击链接浏览详细内容👉【人机对决：国际高中生 VS ChatGPT ！写同一道IB题，结局竟然？】
综上所述，同学们也不必太过妄自菲薄，ChatGPT可以是一个很高的搜索引擎，写作的辅助工具，但并不是具有原创和自己独立思考的个体。一位IBer凭借自己的独立思考能力，优秀的结构与表述，和自身独特的视角与体验，完全可以写出优秀的论文！
文学写作素养并非可速成的，需要大家持之以恒的训练，日积月累才能产生质的飞跃。而IB的写作不仅对大家的文学、语言能力有极高的要求，EE、TOK还要求大家对知识点有深入的理解，有独立的思辨能力。
因此，我们特别为大家准备了IB写作大礼包，包含20+热门科目EE选题优秀范文、50+TOK优秀范文和5本学术论文写作专业指导书。
想要领取IB写作礼包
或了解更多论文写作技巧
扫码添加好友
回复关键词【IB写作】
关注【橡沐国际教育】公众号
随时掌握留学动态~
👇
