【罂粟摘要】硬膜外血贴和纤维蛋白贴片治疗硬膜穿刺后头痛的差异性疗效

文摘   2024-12-11 08:11   贵州  

关注罂粟花,共同学习麻醉学最新文献!

硬膜外血贴和纤维蛋白贴片治疗硬膜穿刺后头痛的差异性疗效

贵州医科大学    麻醉与心脏电生理课题组

翻译:严旭           编辑:王波          审校:曹莹



背景

硬膜外穿破(ADP)是产科进行硬膜外麻醉时最常见的主要并发症。随之而来的脑脊液(CSF)压力下降可导致硬膜穿破后头痛(PDPH),发生率为16%-86%。目前,尚无针对硬膜外纤维蛋白贴片(EFP)疗效的对照临床试验,也未见其与硬膜外血贴(EBP)的比较研究


方法


本研究旨在比较EFPEBP在治疗顽固性意外PDPH方面的疗效。这项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、平行对比研究纳入了70名在医院因常规镇痛治疗失败的意外PDPH产妇。患者随机分为两组,每组35人,分别接受EBPEFP治疗。


结果



使用EFP的患者相比EBP2小时(97.1% vs. 54.3%)和12小时(100.0% vs. 65.7%)后完全缓解PDPH的比例更高。需要救援性镇痛的患者比例显著低于EFP组,分别为2小时(2.9% vs. 48.6%)和12小时(0.0% vs. 37.1%)。24小时后,所有接受EFP治疗的患者均已缓解PDPHEBP组中有1名患者(2.9%)复发PDPH,需进行第二次贴片治疗。EFP组的平均住院时间显著短于EBP组(3.9vs. 5.9天)。在患者满意度方面(Likert量表),EFP组的平均值显著高于EBP组(4.7 vs. 3.0


结论



 EFP在治疗产科PDPH方面,相较于EBP,表现出更高的疗效、更好的安全性及更高的患者满意度。




原始文献来源:López-Millán JM, Fernández AO, Fernández JM, et,al. Differential efficacy with epidural blood and fibrin patches for the treatment of post-dural puncture headache[J]. Pain Pract. 2024 Mar;24(3):440-448. doi: 10.1111/papr.13318.


Differential efficacy with epidural blood and fibrin patches for the treatment of post-dural puncture headache

Abstract

Background: Accidental dural puncture (ADP) is the most frequent major complication when performing an epidural procedure in obstetrics. Consequently, loss of pressure in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leads to the development of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), which occurs in 16%-86% of cases. To date, the efficacy of epidural fibrin patches (EFP) has not been evaluated in a controlled clinical trial, nor in comparative studies with epidural blood patches (EBP).

Methods: The objective of the present study was to compare the efficacy of EFP with respect to EBP for the treatment of refractory accidental PDPH. This prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel, comparative study included 70 puerperal women who received an EBP or EFP (35 in each group) after failure of the conventional analgesic treatment for accidental PDPH in a hospital.

Results: A higher percentage of women with EFP than EBP achieved complete PDPH relief after 2 (97.1% vs. 54.3%) and 12 h (100.0% vs. 65.7%) of the patch injection. The percentage of patients who needed rescue analgesia was significantly lower with EFP after 2 (2.9% vs. 48.6%) and 12 h (0.0% vs. 37.1%). After 24 h, PDPH was resolved in all women who received EFP. The recurrence of PDPH was reported in one woman from the EBP group (2.9%), who subsequently required a second patch. The mean length of hospital stay was significantly lower with EFP (3.9 days) than EBP (5.9 days). Regarding satisfaction, the mean value (Likert scale) was significantly higher with EFP (4.7 vs. 3.0).

Conclusions: EFP provided better outcomes than EBP for the treatment of obstetric PDPH in terms of efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction.

END



罂粟花
罂粟花,临床麻醉医生的文献阅读平台!
 最新文章