【罂粟摘要】颈动脉内膜切除术患者手动持续性膨胀与阶梯式PEEP对肺和脑部结局的影响

文摘   2024-12-13 07:01   贵州  

关注罂粟花,共同学习麻醉学最新文献!

颈动脉内膜切除术患者手动持续性膨胀与阶梯式PEEP对肺和脑部结局的影响

贵州医科大学    麻醉与心脏电生理课题组

翻译:赵游霄           编辑:王波          审校:曹莹



背景

肺复张操作(RM)用于减少全身麻醉患者的肺不张,但会导致脑血流动力学下降

材料/方法


30 名接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者被随机分为手动持续充气 (SI) 组或逐步增加 PEEP (IP) 组。在两次 RM 期间,气道峰值压力 (Ppeak) 保持在 30 cmH2O 30 秒。使用电阻抗断层扫描来评估肺通气变化。术中监测大脑中动脉平均血流速度(Vm)和脑氧饱和度(rScO2)。

结果


Ppeak=30 cmH2O 时,IP 比 SI 更好地改善肺通气(58.2±8.4% vs 46.0±8.3%,P=0.001),并且这种情况一直持续到手术结束。 SI组拔管后30 min背侧(依赖)通气量低于术前(7.7±2.6% vs 9.9±3.8%,P=0.003)。 SI 组的 Vm 和 rScO2 在 RM 后立即恢复到基线,而 IP 组的 Vm 和 rScO2 仍低于基线(42.5±12.6 vs 50.9±18.8 cm/s,P<0.001 和 68.1±3.5% vs 70.6±3.7%,P  =0.001)。仅 SI 组在 RM 期间心率显着下降(55.9±6.6 vs 52.2±6.9 bpm,P=0.008)。


结论



与 SI 相比,IP 在改善肺通气方面表现更好,血流动力学稳定性更好。 IP导致脑血流和氧合恢复较慢




原始文献来源:Liang C, Wang T, Wang P, et al. Impact of Manual Sustained Inflation vs Stepwise PEEP on Pulmonary and Cerebral Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy Patients [J]. Medical Science Monitor, 2024, 30.


Impact of Manual Sustained Inflation vs Stepwise PEEP on Pulmonary and Cerebral Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy Patients

Background: Recruitment maneuvers (RMs) are used to reduce pulmonary atelectasis in patients under general anesthesia, but they can lead to a decrease in cerebral hemodynamics.

Material/Methods: Thirty patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were randomized to a manual sustained inflation (SI) group or a stepwise increase in PEEP (IP) group. During both RMs, the peak airway pressure (Ppeak) was maintained at 30 cmH2O for 30 s. Electrical impedance tomography was used to evaluate pulmonary aeration changes. Mean velocity of blood flow in the middle cerebral artery (Vm) and cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) was monitored intraoperatively.

Results: IP improved lung aeration better at Ppeak=30 cmH2O than SI (58.2±8.4% vs 46.0±8.3%, P=0.001) and this persisted until the end of surgery. Dorsal (dependent) ventilation 30 min after extubation in the SI group was lower than that before surgery (7.7±2.6% vs 9.9±3.8%, P=0.003). Vm and rScO2 returned to baseline immediately after RM in the SI group, while it remained below baseline in the IP group (42.5±12.6 vs 50.9±18.8 cm/s, P<0.001 and 68.1±3.5% vs 70.6±3.7%, P=0.001). Heart rate declined significantly during RM only in the SI group (55.9±6.6 vs 52.2±6.9 bpm, P=0.008).

Conclusions: Compared with SI, IP performed better in improving lung aeration, with greater hemodynamic stability. IP resulted in slower recovery of cerebral blood flow and oxygenation.

END



罂粟花
罂粟花,临床麻醉医生的文献阅读平台!
 最新文章