雅思写作7.5分语料| 政府类:政府应该为医疗和教育付费吗?

文摘   2024-11-15 07:01   上海  
雅思写作历年大作文真题:Some people think the government should pay for health care and education, but others believe it is not the government's responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.有些人认为政府应该为医疗保健和教育买单,但其他人认为这不是政府的责任。讨论两种观点并给出你的观点。


a contentious issue有争议的问题
with differing opinions on the extent of the government's responsibility对政府的责任范围有不同的看法
be essential for societal well-being对社会福祉至关重要
ensure accessibility and quality确保可及性和质量
should be left to the private sector应该留给私营部门
The issue of whether the government should provide for health care and education is a contentious one, with differing opinions on the extent of the government's responsibility. Advocates argue that these services are essential for societal well-being and that it is the government's duty to ensure accessibility and quality. Conversely, opponents assert that providing these services should be left to the private sector. In this essay, we will explore both perspectives and offer a reasoned opinion.


fundamental rights that should be guaranteed by the government政府应该保障的基本权利
should have access to quality health care and education应该享有高质量的医疗保健和教育
regardless of their financial status不管他们的经济状况如何
can ensure equal opportunities能确保机会均等
reduce social inequalities减少社会不平等
contribute to the overall well-being of society为社会整体福祉作出贡献
public provision 公共供给
allows for greater regulation and control允许更大的监管和控制
ensure that standards are met确保达到标准
be not exploited by profit-driven entities不被逐利实体剥削
On one hand, proponents argue that health care and education are fundamental rights that should be guaranteed by the government. They argue that everyone should have access to quality health care and education, regardless of their financial status. By providing these services, governments can ensure equal opportunities, reduce social inequalities, and contribute to the overall well-being of society. Furthermore, public provision allows for greater regulation and control, ensuring that standards are met and that vulnerable individuals are not exploited by profit-driven entities.



inefficient  public provision低效的公共供给
lead to excessive costs and low-quality services导致成本过高,服务质量低下
be driven by competition and market forces受竞争和市场力量的驱动
provide better services at more affordable prices以更实惠的价格提供更优质的服务
should be accountable for their own health and education应该为自己的健康和教育负责
On the other hand, opponents contend that health care and education should not be the responsibility of the government. They argue that public provision can be inefficient, leading to excessive costs and low-quality services. They believe that the private sector, driven by competition and market forces, will provide better services at more affordable prices. Additionally, they argue that individual responsibility is crucial, and people should be accountable for their own health and education, rather than relying on the government.


should not be solely responsible for health care and education不应该单独负责卫生保健和教育
play a crucial role in ensuring accessibility and quality在确保可及性和质量方面发挥关键作用
can create and regulate frameworks that ensure fair competition and affordable private sector services能建立和管理确保公平竞争和负担得起的私营部门服务的框架
provide a safety net for those unable to afford these services为那些负担不起这些服务的人提供安全网
this hybrid model这个混合模式
can promote innovation, competition, and efficiency这个混合模型
In reality, a balanced approach is needed. While it is true that governments should not be solely responsible for health care and education, they play a crucial role in ensuring accessibility and quality. Governments can create and regulate frameworks that ensure fair competition and affordable private sector services, while also providing a safety net for those unable to afford these services. This hybrid model can promote innovation, competition, and efficiency, while also ensuring that no one is left behind.


minimal government involvement 政府少量的参与
highlight the importance of equal access and societal well-being强调平等机会和社会福祉的重要性
strike a balance between government provision and private sector competition在政府供应和私营部门竞争之间取得平衡
ensure accessible, high-quality health care and education for all确保人人享有高质量的卫生保健和教育
In conclusion, the question of whether the government should pay for health care and education is a complex one. While opponents argue for minimal government involvement and emphasize individual responsibility, proponents highlight the importance of equal access and societal well-being. Striking a balance between government provision and private sector competition is vital to ensure accessible, high-quality health care and education for all.

Sharon黄文琪雅思口语干货推荐

雅思口语 |10个让你听起来像贵族的高级词汇

打招呼只会说How are you吗?

雅思口语|中国学生容易犯的7个错误,最后一个你踩坑了吗?

雅思口语语法7+技巧

雅思口语 part3 future 类话题考官范文分析

雅思口语 8分副词

雅思口语| 3个让你轻松上7分的短语

雅思口语 考试刚开始时有哪些注意要点?

雅思口语时态之过去将来完成进行时

雅思口语 语法句式之8分英语思维

雅思口语 如何展现时态变化拿到语法7+甚至8+

雅思口语8分语法学习之独立主格结构

雅思口语 | 学会这一点让你的口语轻松上7

雅思口语  情态动词如何助你上7分

雅思口语7.5分技巧之量词的使用

雅思口语高分技巧之模糊语的使用

雅思口语| English native speakers 常说的话语标记语

如何让雅思口语说得流利

雅思口语 | 5个助你上7.5分的习语

雅思口语 | 如何使用简单又口语化的词?


更多雅思口语干货欢迎关注微信公众号:Sharon黄文琪


扫码关注我吧

Sharon黄文琪
雅思9年教学经验,英国留学对外英语教育硕士,雅思听说读写全科教师
 最新文章