业主和承包商参与重大基础设施项目协同风险管理的动机研究
Examining Owners’ and Contractors’ Motivations to Participate in Collaborative Risk Management of Mega Infrastructure Projects
论文介绍
在重大基础设施项目风险管理实践中，项目利益相关者的协同工作并不容易实现。虽然合同或系统可能规定了协作方法，但利益相关者的参与通常是自愿的。了解项目利益相关者在重大基础设施项目的协同风险管理中投入精力和时间的原因至关重要。具体来说，我们必须探究：是什么动机驱动利益相关者参与重大基础设施项目协同风险管理？利益相关者参与重大基础设施项目协同风险管理的动机是否存在差异，这些差异是什么？
In the practice of MIP risk management, collaborative working of project stakeholders is not easy to achieve. While collaborative approaches may be stipulated by contracts or systems, stakeholder participation typically remains voluntary. It is imperative to understand the reasons behind project participants' investment of effort and time in CRM of MIPs. Specifically, we must inquire: What motivations drive stakeholders to participate in CRM of MIPs? Are there differences in stakeholders' motivations for engaging in CRM of MIPs, and what are the differences?
本研究结合访谈数据和以往文献的理论框架，构建了利益相关者参与重大基础设施项目协同风险管理的动机框架，该框架结合身份逻辑（组织或个人层面）和利益逻辑（内在驱动或外在刺激），组成四组动机。基于港珠澳大桥的案例研究，讨论了项目业主和承包商之间的动机差异，表明这些差异与利益相关者的身份认同和项目进展密切相关。
By combining interview data with the theoretical framework based on previous literature, this study constructs a motivation framework for stakeholders to participate in collaborative risk management of mega infrastructure projects, comprising four groups of motivations formed by glue identity logic (organizational or individual level) and interest logic (intrinsic drive or extrinsic stimulus). Motivational differences between project owners and contractors are discussed based on the case study of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, indicating that these differences are closely related to the identity of stakeholders and project progress.
下图展示了项目业主和承包商之间动机的差异。
原文亮点
Highlights
亮点1
本研究提出了参与重大基础设施项目协同风险管理的动机框架，包括与组织层面或个人层面以及外部刺激或内部驱动相关的四组动机，该框架基于理论和访谈数据构建，旨在为提供一个包容且系统的视角做出贡献。
This study proposed the motivation framework for participation in collaborative risk management of MIPs, including four groups of motivations related to the organizational level or the individual level and external stimuli or internal drives, which was constructed based on theories and interview data to contribute an inclusive and systematic perspective.
亮点2
基于访谈数据，本文探讨了业主和承包商之间的动机差异。
Some differences in motivations between owners and contractors were discussed based on interview data.
亮点3
业主和承包商之间的动机差异主要体现在组织层面，但在剥离组织身份后，承包商和业主在个人层面动机的认知上几乎没有差异。
The motivation differences between owners and contractors are primarily organizational-level, but after stripping organizational identities, contractors and owners have little difference in perceptions of individual-level motivations.
亮点4
随着项目的推进，业主与承包商在动机上的差异逐渐缩小，以实现共同目标并完成项目。
As the project progressed, the differences between the owner and the contractor in motivation gradually narrowed to achieve a common goal and complete the project.
李元莉
重庆大学 管理科学与房地产学院 博士研究生
研究方向：重大工程项目管理、风险协同管理
向鹏成
重庆大学 管理科学与房地产学院 教授
研究方向：重大工程项目管理、安全风险与应急管理
Paul W Chan
Professor of Design and Construction Management at the Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment at Delft University of Technology
Research direction lies in social practices in the field of project studies.
张劲文
广州航海学院 副校长、教授
研究方向：重大工程管理、海洋工程技术
精彩回顾
PREVIOUS REVIEW
期刊链接
JOURNAL LINK
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102614
欢迎投稿
Welcome to submit your research and contribute to IJPM!
扫描二维码获取
更多精彩
IJPM公众号
阅读全文
