晚期乳腺癌内分泌治疗耐药新突破

学术   健康   2024-12-12 15:29   上海  

  2024年12月10日,第47届圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会在德克萨斯州第二大城市圣安东尼奥开幕,这是全球最大的乳腺癌研究会议,预计将有来自102多个国家和地区的1.1万多位临床工作者、研究者和患者参加。

  2024年12月11日,国际四大医学期刊之一、创刊212周年的美国麻省医学会《新英格兰医学杂志》首页头条和第47届圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会首场全体大会首位报告者同时公布美国、比利时、阿根廷、韩国、日本、西班牙、德国、意大利、澳大利亚、墨西哥、巴西、法国中国哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院张清媛29位学者代表EMBER-3研究协作组起草的研究结果,首次对英鲁奈司群±阿贝西利或者标准内分泌单药治疗晚期乳腺癌内分泌治疗耐药患者的有效性和安全性进行比较。



  • NCT04975308: A Study of Imlunestrant, Investigator's Choice of Endocrine Therapy, and Imlunestrant Plus Abemaciclib in Participants With ER+, HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer (EMBER-3)
  • Official Title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Imlunestrant, Investigator's Choice of Endocrine Therapy, and Imlunestrant Plus Abemaciclib in Patients With Estrogen Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Endocrine Therapy
  • GS1-01: Imlunestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD), as Monotherapy and Combined with Abemaciclib, for Patients with ER+, HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC), Pretreated with Endocrine Therapy (ET): Results of the Phase 3 EMBER-3 trial.

  英鲁奈司群是可渗透血脑屏障、可口服的新一代选择性雌激素受体降解剂,即使对于雌激素受体α编码基因ESR1发生突变的乳腺癌也能发挥持续抑制作用。

  该国际多中心非盲随机对照三期临床研究于2021年10月至2023年11月从全球22个国家和地区195个研究中心入组雌激素受体阳性HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌芳香化酶抑制剂单独或联合CDK4/6抑制剂治疗期间或之后出现复发或进展患者874例(中位年龄61岁,范围27至89岁,55.5%有内脏转移,59.8%用过CDK4/6抑制剂治疗;其中256例ESR1突变,占38.7%,这些患者与全部患者相比,基线特征大致相似,但是PI3K通路突变、肝转移、用过CDK4/6抑制剂治疗患者比例略高,分别占50.4%、40.6%、69.5%)按1∶1∶1的比例随机分为三组:
  • 英鲁奈司群:331例
  • 标准单药内分泌治疗:330例(其中氟维司群292例)
  • 英鲁奈司群+阿贝西利:213例


  主要终点为ESR1突变患者无论是否突变患者英鲁奈司群与标准治疗相比、同时随机入组全部患者英鲁奈司群+阿贝西利与英鲁奈司群相比,研究者评定的无进展生存。如若生存曲线不平行且比例风险假设不成立,则进行受限平均生存分析(截至特定时间点的生存曲线下面积)。关键次要终点为总生存。其他次要终点包括通过盲法独立集中复核评定的无进展生存、总缓解率和安全性。

  结果,对于256例ESR1突变患者,英鲁奈司群与标准治疗相比:
  • 中位无进展生存:5.5个月比3.8个月
  • 由于存在非比例风险证据,估计受限平均生存19.4个月
  • 中位无进展生存:7.9个月比5.4个月(95%置信区间:6.8~9.1、4.6~6.2)
  • 受限平均生存相差:2.6个月(95%置信区间:1.2~3.9,P<0.001)
  • 18个月估计总生存率:77.0%比58.6%(95%置信区间:67.4~84.1、47.2~68.3)
  • 死亡风险比:0.55(95%置信区间:0.35~0.86,P=0.008,未低于预设2.2×10-10


  对于661例无论是否突变患者,英鲁奈司群与标准治疗相比:
  • 中位无进展生存:5.6个月比5.5个月
  • 进展或死亡风险比:0.87(95%置信区间:0.72~1.04,P=0.12)
  • 18个月估计总生存率:78.6%比71.8%(95%置信区间:72.6~83.5、65.4~77.2)
  • 死亡风险比:0.69(95%置信区间:0.50~0.96,未进行统计学检验)


  对于426例同时随机入组全部患者,英鲁奈司群+阿贝西利与英鲁奈司群相比:
  • 中位无进展生存:9.4个月比5.5个月
  • 进展或死亡风险比:0.57(95%置信区间:0.44~0.73,P<0.001)

  对于279例用过CDK4/6抑制剂的同时随机入组患者,英鲁奈司群+阿贝西利与英鲁奈司群相比:
  • 中位无进展生存:9.1个月比3.7个月
  • 进展或死亡风险比:0.51(95%置信区间:0.38~0.68,未进行统计学检验)


  英鲁奈司群、标准治疗、英鲁奈司群+阿贝西利相比,≥3级不良事件发生率分别为17.1%、20.7%、48.6%。


  因此,该研究令人烧脑的设计和结果表明,对于雌激素受体阳性HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌,英鲁奈司群氟维司群等标准单药内分泌治疗相比,ESR1突变患者无进展生存显著较长英鲁奈司群+阿贝西利英鲁奈司群相比,无论ESR1是否突变无进展生存显著较长

  阿贝西利等CDK4/6抑制剂一直是芳香化酶抑制剂标准内分泌治疗的重要补充,如果出现进展,CDK4/6抑制剂联合选择性雌激素受体降解剂可能获益。不过,由于氟维司群等现有选择性雌激素受体降解剂的局限性,包括口服生物利用度低、需要每月肌肉注射,以及对出现ESR1突变患者疗效有限,正在开发的英鲁奈司群等新一代选择性雌激素受体降解剂可以通过口服简化给药提高疗效和患者体验,而且40%~50%的内分泌治疗进展患者可出现ESR1突变。

  这些有希望的结果意味着,对于许多乳腺癌复发伴ESR1突变患者而言,英鲁奈司群可能是另一种单药选择。此外,英鲁奈司群+阿贝西利与英鲁奈司群相比,中位无进展生存分别为9.4个月和5.5个月,疾病进展或死亡风险降低43%。对于全部患者都观察到这两种药物联合的获益,无论是否ESR1突变或PI3K通路突变患者以及是否用过CDK4/6抑制剂治疗,而且这两种药物都可口服

  由于目前大多数符合二线治疗条件的患者之前都用过CDK4/6抑制剂治疗,而且许多目前可用的二线治疗需要进行生物标志物选择,因此这些结果对临床相关亚组的一致性令人放心。

  英鲁奈司群无论作为单药治疗还是联合治疗,安全性和耐受性都良好,不良事件通常级别较低而且可控,并且没有其他口服选择性雌激素受体降解剂特有的眼部或心脏安全问题。该联合的安全性与已知的氟维司群+阿贝西利安全性一致,停药率相对较低,仅6.3%,与现有的联合方案相比更为有利。此外,根据该研究患者报告结局数据,72%的氟维司群治疗患者报告注射部位疼痛、肿胀或发红

  总而言之,这些数据对于患者而言值得期待,表明英鲁奈司群单药治疗或联合阿贝西利有望成为雌激素受体阳性HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌内分泌治疗进展后患者全口服靶向治疗新选择


N Engl J Med. 2024 Dec 11. IF: 96.2


Imlunestrant with or without Abemaciclib in Advanced Breast Cancer.


Jhaveri KL, Neven P, Casalnuovo ML, Kim SB, Tokunaga E, Aftimos P, Saura C, O'Shaughnessy J, Harbeck N, Carey LA, Curigliano G, Llombart-Cussac A, Lim E, García Tinoco ML, Sohn J, Mattar A, Zhang Q, Huang CS, Hung CC, Martinez Rodriguez JL, Ruíz Borrego M, Nakamura R, Pradhan KR, Cramer von Laue C, Barrett E, Cao S, Wang XA, Smyth LM, Bidard FC; EMBER-3 Study Group.


Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Hospital María Curie, Buenos Aires; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; Institut Jules Bordet, Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, U.S. Oncology, Dallas; the Breast Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich University Hospital, Munich, Germany; the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of Milan, Milan; the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; Garvan Institute of Medical Research and University of New South Wales, Sydney; Hospital de Oncología, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Mexico City; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Women's Health Hospital, Sao Paulo; Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China; National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei; Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Filios Alta Medicina, Monterrey, Mexico; Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain; Chiba Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis; Institut Curie and University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines-Paris-Saclay University, Paris.


BACKGROUND: Imlunestrant is a next-generation, brain-penetrant, oral selective estrogen-receptor (ER) degrader that delivers continuous ER inhibition, even in cancers with mutations in the gene encoding ERα (ESR1).


METHODS: In a phase 3, open-label trial, we enrolled patients with ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer that recurred or progressed during or after aromatase inhibitor therapy, administered alone or with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor. Patients were assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive imlunestrant, standard endocrine monotherapy, or imlunestrant-abemaciclib. Primary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival with imlunestrant as compared with standard therapy among patients with ESR1 mutations and among all patients and with imlunestrant-abemaciclib as compared with imlunestrant among all patients who had undergone randomization concurrently.


RESULTS: Overall, 874 patients underwent randomization, with 331 assigned to imlunestrant, 330 to standard therapy, and 213 to imlunestrant-abemaciclib. Among 256 patients with ESR1 mutations, the median progression-free survival was 5.5 months with imlunestrant and 3.8 months with standard therapy. The estimated restricted mean survival time at 19.4 months was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8 to 9.1) with imlunestrant and 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 6.2) with standard therapy (difference, 2.6 months; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.9; P<0.001). In the overall population, the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months with imlunestrant and 5.5 months with standard therapy (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.04; P = 0.12). Among 426 patients in the comparison of imlunestrant-abemaciclib with imlunestrant, the median progression-free survival was 9.4 months and 5.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.73; P<0.001). The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 17.1% with imlunestrant, 20.7% with standard therapy, and 48.6% with imlunestrant-abemaciclib.


CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, treatment with imlunestrant led to significantly longer progression-free survival than standard therapy among those with ESR1 mutations but not in the overall population. Imlunestrant-abemaciclib significantly improved progression-free survival as compared with imlunestrant, regardless of ESR1-mutation status.


Funded by Eli Lilly


EMBER-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04975308.


PMID: 39660834


DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2410858





































SIBCS
上海国际乳腺癌论坛(Shanghai International Breast Cancer Symposium)
 最新文章