Pragmatics and Society
Volume 15, Issue 1-5, 2024
Pragmatics and Society（SSCI三区，2023 IF：0.7，排名：144/194）2024年第1-6期共发文48篇，其中2024年第1期共发文12篇，涉及阿尔兹海默症双语者包容、老年人互动、痴呆护理语言等主题。2024年第2期共发文6篇，涉及修辞学、土耳其语、在线医疗咨询、伊朗语波斯语对比等主题。2024年第3期共发文7篇，涉及文化和身份、在线投诉、学术写作中作者自引用、舆论逆转等主题。2024年第4期共发文7篇，涉及意识形态名称、负面判断、开放性问题、政治修辞等主题。2024年第5期共发文8篇，涉及非话语语言行为、情感潜力、缓解分歧的方法、通用语言交互、跨文化语用学等主题。2024年第6期共发文8篇，涉及医疗咨询话语、专家与公众交际、谚语中的女性话语、认知语用学、网络幽默等主题。欢迎转发扩散！（2024年已更完）
目录
第1期
■ Taking actions to enhance inclusivity of persons living with dementia（采取行动加强对痴呆症患者的包容）, by Yoshiko Matsumoto and Heidi E. Hamilton, Pages 1–16.
■ Determiners of social inclusion and exclusion in the dementia context（痴呆症背景下社会包容和排斥的决定因素）, by Alison Wray and Axel Bergström, Pages 17–32.
■ "That was a long time ago"—Memory work spanning the arc from normal healthy aging to cognitive impairment（“那是很久以前的事了”——记忆工作跨越了从正常健康衰老到认知障碍的弧线）, by Elena Bandt and Annette Gerstenberg, Pages 33–48.
■ Code accommodation as a measure of inclusion for bilingual people living with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type（代码调节作为阿尔茨海默氏症型痴呆双语患者包容性的衡量标准）, by Carolin Schneider and Birte Bös, Pages 49–66.
■ Attitudes to language and bilingualism in residential care for older persons in Ireland（爱尔兰老年人寄宿护理中对语言和双语的态度）, by Nicole Müller and Angela M. Medina, Pages 67–84.
■ Learning from initial reviews of multilingual graphics illustrating dementia caregiving（从多语种痴呆症护理图解的初步审查中学习）, by Boyd H. Davis, Margaret Maclagan and Meredith Troutman-Jordan, Pages 85–103.
■ On an even playing field of haiku making—An inclusive activity of creative verbal art（俳句创作的公平竞争——创造性语言艺术的包容性活动）, by Yoshiko Matsumoto, Harumi Maeda, Emily Yu Wan and Hsiao-Wen Liao, Pages 104–121.
■ Verbal play in dementia care—A longitudinal study（痴呆症护理中的语言游戏——纵向研究）, by Shumin Lin, Pages 122–139.
■ "Let' s Just Forget It!"—Discourse of inclusion in a Japanese nursing home（“忘了吧”——日本养老院中的包容话语）, by Toshiko Hamaguchi, Pages 140–156.
■ Singling out—A method of group inclusion for residents living with dementia（挑选——一种让患有老年痴呆症的居民融入群体的方法）, by Gitte Rasmussen, Pages 157–177.
■ 'Proto-conversation' as a practice in late-stage dementia care（作为晚期痴呆症护理实践的“原对话”）, by Lars-Christer Hydén, Anna Ekström and Ali Reza Majlesi, Pages 178–195.
■ Conversation practices that foster or hinder inclusivity during interactions involving persons with dementia（在有痴呆症患者参与的互动过程中促进或阻碍包容性的对话方式）, by Trini Stickle, Pages 196–213.
第2期
■ “I hope this is your last sorrow”—Condolence strategies in colloquial Persian（“我希望这是你最后的悲伤”波斯语中的吊唁策略）, by Amir Sheikhan, Pages 215–245.
■ The interpersonal semantics of rhetoric—Ideological variations and their rhetorical construction in the GM debate in China（修辞的人际语义——中国转基因辩论中的意识形态变异及其修辞建构）, by Wenge Chen and Ranran Zhang, Pages 246–274.
■ Common ground management via evidential markers in Turkish（通过土耳其语证据标记进行共同点管理）, by Kadri Kuram, Pages 275–294.
■ Deontic authority-based resolution of deontic right-based resistance in online medical consultation（在线医疗咨询中基于道义权威的道义权利阻力解决方案）, by Minwen Wei and Yongping Ran, Pages 295–319.
■ Comparing compliments in Face-to-Face vs. online interactions among Iranian speakers of Persian（比较伊朗波斯语使用者在面对面互动和在线互动中的赞美之词）, by Ali Derakhshan, Zohreh R. Eslami and Farzaneh Shakki, Pages 320–344.
■ Review of Placencia & Eslami (2020): Complimenting Behavior and (Self)Praise across Social Media. New Contexts and New Insights（回顾 Placencia & Eslami (2020)：社交媒体上的点赞行为与（自我）赞美。新语境与新见解）, by Juan J. Colomina-Almiñana, Pages345–349.
第3期
■ Culture and identity in critical remarks—A case study of Russian and Israeli academic classroom discourse（批判性言论中的文化与身份——俄罗斯和以色列学术课堂言论案例研究）, by Claudia Zbenovich, Tatiana Larina and Vladimir Ozyumenko, Pages 351–375.
■ A contrastive study of Chinese and American online complaints—Speech act construction in relation to face management（中美网络投诉对比研究——与面子管理相关的言语行为建构）, by Ming Wei, Pages 376–399.
■ Making up or taunting?—Positive rapport and negative rapport strategies in response to sharing business Airbnb' s online negative reviews: A cross-linguistic study（编造还是嘲弄？——针对共享企业 Airbnb 的在线负面评论的积极融洽和消极融洽策略：跨语言研究）, by Wei Feng and Leyang An, Pages 400–424.
■ Conventions of author self-reference in Chinese academic writing—Modesty as motivation（中文学术写作中的作者自述习惯——以谦虚为动力）, by Rong Chen and Dafu Yang, Pages 425–447.
■ Attacks and remedies in online public opinion reversal events（网络舆论反转事件中的攻击和补救措施）, by Yiman Wu, Wei Ren and Yi Zhang, Pages 448–470.
■ Blame-avoiding strategies for a digital scandal—A critical discourse analysis of Mark Zuckerberg's Congressional hearings（数字丑闻的避责策略——对马克扎克伯格国会听证会的批判性话语分析）, by Ming Liu and Yanxi Lu, Pages 471–494.
■ Review of Walton, Macagno & Sartor (2019): Statutory Interpretation. Pragmatics and Argumentation（评论 Walton, Macagno & Sartor (2019)：法定解释。语用学与论证）, by Jan Engberg, Pages 495–499.
第4期
■ Historical imprints on Chinese ideological given names（中国意识形态名称的历史印记）, by Heng Su, Peyman G. P. Sabet and Grace Q. Zhang, Pages 501–531.
■ Correcting the scientific record—Legitimation strategies in retraction notices（更正科学记录--撤稿通知中的辩驳策略）, by Yuting Lin, Pages 532–556.
■ Criticizing for the public interest and aligning with others—How Jordanians constructed their online criticisms of lockdown breaches during the COVID-19 pandemic（为公共利益而批评并与他人结盟——约旦人如何在网上对 COVID-19 大流行期间的封锁违规行为提出批评）, by Muhammad A. Badarneh and Malak Damiri, Pages 557–583.
■ Degrees of negative judgement—Insights from a qualitative study of six sentencing remarks on judges' sentencing practices（负面评价的程度——对法官量刑实践中六种量刑意见的定性研究的启示）, by Xin Dai, Pages 584–606.
■ Defining openness in teachers' 'open' questions—A pragmatic approach（界定教师 “开放式 ”提问的开放性——一种务实的方法）, by Chrysi Rapanta, Pages 607–631.
■ Patients resist, doctors manage—The management of patient resistance by doctors in Chinese Online Medical Consultation（患者抵触，医生管理——中文在线问诊中医生对患者抵触情绪的管理）, by Yansheng Mao, Shuang Wei and Xiaojiang Wang, Pages 632–654.
■ Review of Cap (2022): The Discourse of Conflict and Crisis: Poland’s Political Rhetoric in the European Perspective（评论 Cap (2022)：冲突与危机的话语：欧洲视角下的波兰政治修辞）, by Roberto M. Lobato, Pages 655–659.
第5期
■ On the constitutional relevance of non‑discursive enlanguaged doings to sociomaterial practices（论非话语性语言行为与社会物质实践的宪法相关性）, by Rasmus Gahrn-Andersen, Pages 661–681.
■ “Not everything is on the hostess”—Cooperative hospitality among Saudi female friends（“并非一切都取决于女主人"——沙特女性朋友之间的合作款待）, by Inas I. Almusallam, Pages 682–707.
■ Affect in the pragmeme of delivering a health directive—Toward an analysis of affective potential in two BBC videos（传递健康指令时的情感——对BBC两段视频中情感潜力的分析）, by Ming-Yu Tseng, Pages 708–731.
■ A politeness-theoretic approach to mitigated disagreements in online radio medical consultations（在线广播医疗咨询中缓解分歧的礼貌理论方法）, by Xin Zhao, Pages 732–754.
■ Politely warning?—A usage-based analysis of directives in Japanese disaster warnings on Twitter（有礼貌地发出警告？——基于使用情况的日本 Twitter 灾难预警指令分析）, by Amy Ives Takebe, Pages 755–778.
■ Exploring lexical associations in English as a Lingua Franca interactions—Taking verbs of perception as an example（探索英语作为外语互动中的词汇关联——以感知动词为例）, by Yang Pang, Pages 779–799.
■ Review of House & Kádár (2021): Cross-cultural pragmatics（评论 House & Kádár (2021)：跨文化语用学）, by Roberto Graci, Pages 800–804.
■ Review of McCready (2019): The Semantics and Pragmatics of Honorification: Register and Social Meaning（回顾麦克雷迪（2019）：荣誉的语义学和语用学：语域与社会意义）, by Chengtuan Li and Xiaorui Li, Pages 805–809.
第6期
■ ‘Like to comment on that?’: Student-oriented questions in British and Montenegrin university linguistics lectures（“喜欢对此发表评论吗？”：英国和黑山大学语言学讲座中面向学生的问题）, by Branka Živković & Milica Vuković-Stamatović, Pages 811–838.
■ Discursive positioning of doctors and e‑patients in online medical consultations in China: An orientation toward affective affiliation（中国在线医疗咨询中医生与电子患者的话语定位：情感联结的导向）, by Yu Zhang, Pages 839–857.
■ Dealing with the dual demands of expertise and democracy: How experts create proximity to the public without undermining their status as experts（应对专业知识与民主的双重需求：专家如何在不削弱其专业地位的情况下拉近与公众的距离）, by Henrike Padmos, Hedwig te Molder & Tom Koole, Pages 858–883.
■ Conspiracy theories and passion: The pragmatics of a Bulgarian debate on vaccination（阴谋论与激情：保加利亚关于疫苗接种辩论的语用学分析）, by Todor Hristov, Pages 884–904.
■ Negotiating academic conflict in discussion sections of doctoral dissertations（在博士论文讨论部分中协商学术冲突）, by F. Esmaili & Esmaeel Abdollahzadeh, Pages 905–928.
■ Representation of women in English and Persian proverbs: A Cultural-Linguistic perspective（英语和波斯语谚语中女性的表征：文化-语言学视角）, by Ali Dabbagh & Esmat Babaii, Pages 929–951.
■ Review of Klaus-Uwe Panther. 2022. Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics（评论 Klaus-Uwe Panther（2022）：认知语用学）, by Kim Ebensgaard Jensen, Pages 952–956.
■ Review of Francisco Yus（2023）Pragmatics of Internet Humour（评论Francisco Yus（2023）网络幽默语用学）, by Ruby Rong Wei & Yanlan Hu, Pages 957-961.
（以上为小编翻译，仅供参考。）
Pragmatics and Society puts the spotlight on societal aspects of language use, while incorporating many other facets of society-oriented pragmatic studies. It brings together a variety of approaches to the study of language in context, inspired by different research perspectives and drawing on various disciplines, for instance, sociology, psychology, developmental and cognitive science, anthropology, media research, and computer-related social studies. It is concerned with how language use and social normativity influence and shape each other, for instance, in education (the teaching and acquisition of first and second languages), in political discourse (with its manipulative language use), in the discourse of business and the workplace, and in all kinds of discriminatory uses of language (gender- and class-based or other). Finally, it pays special attention to the impact that our increased dependency on the computer is having on communication and interaction (especially as seen in the social media), as well as to the role of pragmatics in guiding social and racial emancipatory developments.
《语用学与社会》重点关注语言使用的社会方面，同时纳入了以社会为导向的语用学研究的许多其他方面。它汇集了在语境中研究语言的各种方法，受到不同研究视角的启发，并借鉴了各种学科，例如社会学、心理学、发展和认知科学、人类学、媒体研究以及与计算机相关的社会研究。它关注语言使用和社会规范性如何相互影响和塑造，例如在教育（第一语言和第二语言的教学和习得）、政治话语（及其操纵性语言使用）、商业和工作场所话语以及各种歧视性语言使用（基于性别和阶级或其他）中。最后，它还特别关注我们对计算机的依赖性增加对交流和互动的影响（尤其是在社交媒体中），以及语用学在指导社会和种族解放发展中的作用。
官网地址：
https://benjamins.com/catalog/ps
本文来源：Pragmatics and Society官网
点击文末“阅读原文”可跳转官网
