经济学五大顶刊 《American Economic Review》，《Quarterly Journal of Economics》,《Journal of Political Economy》,《Review of Economic Studies》，《Econometrica》。
据web of science数据库统计，最早在经济学五大刊上发表论文的学者是林毅夫，时间是1990年。
在经济学五大刊分别第一位发表论文的中国境内学者，按照时间顺序如下：
林毅夫 1990 JPE
林毅夫 1992 AER
陈增敬 2002 Econometrica
陈庆池 2008 RES
沈凯玲 2013 QJE
以下是论文具体信息：
《Journal of Political Economy》
Collectivization and China Agricultural Crisis in 1959-1961
集体化与1959-1961年中国农业危机
The agricultural crisis in China in 1959-61, after the initial success of the collectivization movement, resulted in 30 million extra deaths. In this paper, a game theory hypothesis proposes the main cause of this catastrophe. I argue that, because of the difficulty in supervising agricultural work, the success of an agricultural collective depends on a self-enforcing contract, however, can be sustained only in a repeated game. In the fall of 1958, the right to withdraw from a collective was deprived. The nature of the collectivization was thus changed from a repeated game to a one-time game. As a result, the self-enforcing contract could not be sustained and agricultural productivity collapsed. Copyright 1990 by University of Chicago Press.
在集体化运动取得初步成功之后，1959年至1961年的农业危机导致了3000多万人死亡。本文用博弈论的假设提出了这一灾难的主要原因。我认为，由于监督农业工作的困难，农业集体的成功取决于自我执行的契约，然而，只有在重复的博弈中才能维持。1958年秋天，集体退出的权利被剥夺了。集体化的性质由此从重复博弈变成了一次性博弈。结果，这种自我执行的契约无法维持，农业生产力崩溃。
《American Economic Review》
Rural Reforms and Agricultural Growth In China
中国农村改革与农业增长
This paper employs province-level panel data to assess the contributions of decollectivization, price adjustments, and other reforms to China's agricultural growth in the reform period. Decollectivization is found to improve total factor productivity and to account for about half of the output growth during 1978-1984. The adjustment in state procurement prices also contributed positively to output growth. Its impact came mainly from the responses in input use. The effect of other market-related reforms on productivity and output growth was very small. Reasons for slowdown in agricultural growth after 1984 are also analyzed.
本文采用省级面板数据来评估改革时期去集体化、价格调整和其他改革对中国农业增长的贡献。人们发现，去集体化提高了全要素生产率，并在1978-1984年期间约占产出增长的一半。国家采购价格的调整也对产出增长作出了积极贡献。其影响主要来自对投入物使用的反应。其他与市场相关的改革对生产率和产出增长的影响非常小。分析了1984年以后农业增长放缓的原因。
《Econometrica》
Ambiguity, risk, and asset returns in continuous time
连续时间内的模糊性、风险和资产回报
陈增敬 山东大学
Larry Epstein 罗切斯特大学
Models of utility in stochastic continuous-time settings typically assume that beliefs arerepresented by a probability measure, hence ruling out a priori any concern with ambiguity.This paper formulates a continuous-time intertemporal version of multiple-priors utility,where aversion to ambiguity is admissible. In a representative agent asset market setting,the model delivers restrictions on excess returns that admit interpretations reflecting apremium for risk and a separate premium for ambiguity.
随机连续时间设置中的效用模型通常假设信念是由概率度量来表示的，因此排除了对模糊性的先验关注。本文提出了一个多先验效用的连续时间跨时间版本，其中对歧义的厌恶是允许的。在代表性代理资产市场设置中，该模型提供了对超额收益的限制，允许反映风险溢价和单独的模糊性溢价的解释。
《Review of Economic Studies》
A Spatial Theory of News Consumption and Electoral Competition
新闻消费与选举竞争的空间理论
陈庆池 上海财经大学 (现为香港中文大学)
Wing Suen 香港大学
We characterize the optimal editorial positions of the media in a model in which the media influence both voting behaviour and party policies. Political parties are less likely to choose partisan policies when more voters consume informative news. When there are two media outlets, each should be slightly biased relative to its audience in order to attract voters with relatively extreme views. Voter welfare is typically higher under a duopoly than under a monopoly. Two media outlets under joint ownership may provide more diverse viewpoints than two independent ones, but voter welfare is not always higher.
我们在媒体影响投票行为和政党政策的模型中描述了媒体的最佳编辑立场。当更多的选民消费信息性新闻时，政党就不太可能选择党派政策。当有两个媒体时，为了吸引观点相对极端的选民，每个媒体都应该相对于受众有轻微的偏见。双寡头垄断下的选民福利通常高于垄断。两家共同拥有的媒体可能比两家独立的媒体提供更多样化的观点，但选民的福利并不总是更高。
《Quarterly Journal of Economics》
Gender Discrimination in Job Ads: Evidence from China
招聘广告中的性别歧视:来自中国的证据
沈凯玲 厦门大学（现为澳洲国立大学）
Peter Kuhn U 加州大学圣巴巴拉分校
We study explicit gender discrimination in a population of ads on a Chinese Internet job board. Gender-targeted job ads are common, favor women as often as men, and are much less common in jobs requiring higher levels of skill. Employers' relative preferences for female versus male workers, on the other hand, are more strongly related to the preferred age, height, and beauty of the worker than to job skill levels. Almost two thirds of the variation in advertised gender preferences occurs within firms, and one third occurs within firm occupation cells. Overall, these patterns are not well explained by a firm-level animus model, by a glass-ceiling model, or by models in which broad occupational categories are consistently gendered across firms. Instead, the patterns suggest a model in which firms have idiosyncratic preferences for particular job-gender matches, which are overridden in skilled positions by factors such as thinner labor markets or a greater incentive to search broadly for the most qualified candidate.
我们研究了中国互联网招聘板上大量广告中明显的性别歧视。以性别为目标的招聘广告很常见，对女性的青睐和对男性的一样多，而在对技能要求更高的工作中，这种广告就少得多了。另一方面，雇主对女性和男性员工的相对偏好与员工的年龄、身高和美貌的关系更大，而不是与工作技能水平的关系。几乎三分之二的广告性别偏好变化发生在公司内部，三分之一发生在公司的职业单元中。总的来说，这些模式并不能很好地解释公司层面的男性意向模型、玻璃天花板模型，或者在公司中广泛的职业类别始终是性别化的模型。相反，这些模式表明了一种模式，即公司对特定的工作性别匹配有着特殊的偏好，而在技术岗位上，这种偏好被劳动力市场萎缩或更大范围寻找最合格候选人的动机等因素所掩盖。
