「经济学人」A postcard from Baku

教育   2024-11-22 20:30   福建  
A postcard from Baku
Big oil may be softening its stance on climate-change regulation

ExxonMobil’s boss wants America to stick with the Paris accord

A spectre hangs over Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, where diplomats, scientists and activists are gathered for the UN’s annual climate-change summit. Last time he was in office Donald Trump, a fossil-fuel booster and climate-science denier, yanked America out of the UN’s Paris climate agreement (it later rejoined). The president-elect has vowed to do so again on his first day back in office.


To add to climate warriors’ gloom, Shell, a British oil giant, won an important legal victory this week. In 2021 a Dutch court had ordered the company to cut its emissions of greenhouse gases by 45% by 2030, in line with the Paris agreement. On November 12th the Hague Court of Appeal overturned the ruling.


Yet those championing climate action also received a boost from an unexpected quarter this week. “We will continue to advocate for the world to address greenhouse-gas emissions and the world needs to do this on a collective basis,” declared Darren Woods, the boss of ExxonMobil, America’s biggest oil-and-gas company, at the event in Baku. He added, for good measure, “I’m not sure how ‘drill, baby, drill’ [a frequent Trump campaign chant] translates into policy.”


Although the Dutch judgment and Mr Woods’s remarks send seemingly conflicting signals on the outlook for climate action, two threads connect them. One is a growing recognition that government regulation, which oilmen reflexively criticise, matters in a world worried about the climate. The appeal court made it clear that responsibility for responding to climate change lies mainly with governments, not companies. It did not let firms off the hook; Shell, it said, had a duty to “limit its carbon-dioxide emissions”. But it found insufficient scientific basis for a court to impose emissions targets on firms.


Mr Woods, too, appears to be converted to the need for government intervention on the climate—or at least some policy continuity. In an interview with The Economist, he cautions Mr Trump against scrapping America’s Inflation Reduction Act, a law passed in 2022 that offers generous subsidies and tax incentives for clean technologies like hydrogen and carbon capture in which ExxonMobil is now investing. He also warns Mr Trump against leaving the Paris agreement: “It doesn’t benefit our country going in and out, in and out.”


The second connecting thread is the need for better measurement of emissions. Although the Dutch court acknowledged Shell’s efforts at reducing emissions from its own operations, it noted the difficulty of measuring and attributing those generated by the fuels it sells. For its part, ExxonMobil wants a global effort to lower the carbon intensity of products, based on standardised metrics, which are currently lacking. “Let’s establish a global accounting system for carbon,” Mr Woods says. Such words would have been unthinkable from an Exxon boss a generation ago.


This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline “A postcard from Baku” (Nov 14th 2024)

我没有译文,仅供拓展阅读

LearnAndRecord

2015年2月8日

2024年11月22日

第3576天

每天持续行动学外语

LearnAndRecord
每天持续行动学外语,持续日更3000+天。学习记录,外刊阅读。前行路上,谢谢你的关注和相伴,让我知道我不是一个人在努力。如果哪天这里找不到我了,可以去另一公众号「英语学习社」看看。
 最新文章