作为人体负重最大的关节，踝关节骨折的 Lauge-Hansen 分型对于很多年轻骨科医生来说既熟悉又陌生。以下内容结合相关文献详细阐述这一分型，并与 AO 分型相对应。
Lauge-Hansen 分类
当足处于旋后位时，内侧的三角韧带松弛，因此最初损伤的是外侧结构
旋后内收损伤
AO/OTA 分型
44C 腓骨骨折线位于下胫腓联合上方，下胫腓关节不稳定。
两种分型的对应关系
后记
理想的骨折可根据骨折分型来判断治疗方案，并能提供给医生和患者预后的预判。
总之，AO 分型对手术治疗有一定指导意义。Lauge-Hansen 分型主要基于踝关节的间接损伤机制，常用来指导骨折的闭合复位。
作者：小六
题图、插图：来源于参考文献
参考文献
1.Çabuk, Haluk; Çelebi, Filiz; İmren, Yunus; Dedeoğlu, Süleyman Semih; Kır, Mustafa Çağlar; Uyanık, Abdullah Faruk; Gürbüz, Hakan (2018). Compatibility of Lauge-Hansen Classification Between Plain Radiographs and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ankle Fractures. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, (), S1067251617307032–.
2. 骨折治疗的 AO 原则第三版.
3.AO/OTA Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018
4.A. Russo,A. Reginelli,M. Zappia,C. Rossi,O. Fabozzi… (2013). Ankle fracture: radiographic approach according to the Lauge-Hansen classification. , 97(2 Supplement), 155–160. doi:10.1007/s12306-013-0284-x
5.Okanobo, H.; Khurana, B.; Sheehan, S.; Duran-Mendicuti, A.; Arianjam, A.; Ledbetter, S. (2012). Simplified Diagnostic Algorithm for Lauge-Hansen Classification of Ankle Injuries. , 32(2), 0–0. doi:10.1148/rg.322115017
6. 解放军总医院创伤骨科手术学
7. 创伤骨科手术学.
8. 骨折的分类与功能评定.
9.Gardner, Michael J.; Demetrakopoulos, Demetris; Briggs, Stephen M.; Helfet, David L.; Lorich, Dean G. (2006). The Ability of the Lauge-Hansen Classification to Predict Ligament Injury and Mechanism in Ankle Fractures: An MRI Study. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 20(4), 267–272. doi:10.1097/00005131-200604000-00006
10. Park JW, Kim SK,Hong JS,et al. Anteriortibiofibular ligament avulsion fracture in Weber type lateral malleolar fracture.J Trauma, 2002,52(4):655-659.
11.McConnell, T, Tornetta P, ⅢI. Marginal plafondimpaction in association with supination-adduction ankle fractures: A report of eight cases. J Orthop Trauma,2001,15:447-449.
12.Rüedi TP,Murphy WM.AO Principles of Fracture Management. Stuttgart: Thieme,2000. Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification.J Orthop Trauma,1996,10(S 1): v-ix, 1-154.
13.Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification.J Orthop Trauma,1996,10(Suppl 1):v-ix,1-154.
14.Harper, M. C. (1992). Ankle Fracture Classification Systems: A Case for Integration of the Lauge-Hansen and AO-Danis-Weber Schemes. Foot & Ankle International, 13(7), 404–407. doi:10.1177/107110079201300708
15.Skie M, Woldenberg L,Ebraheim N,et al. Assessment of collicular fractures of the medial malleolus. Foot Ankle,1989: 118-123.
16.Markolf KL, Schmalzried TP, Ferkel RD. Torsionalstrength of the ankle in vitro. The supination-external-rotation injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1989:266-272.
17.Siegler, Sorin; Chen, Jie; Schneck, C. D. (1988). The Three-Dimensional Kinematics and Flexibility Characteristics of the Human Ankle and Subtalar Joints—Part I: Kinematics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 110(4), 364–. doi:10.1115/1.3108455
18.Pankovich AM, Shivaram MS.Anatomical basis ofvariability in injuries of the medial malleolus and the deltoid ligament. II. Clinical studies. Acta Orthop Scand, 1979,50:225-336.
19.Pankovich A M.Fractures of the fibula proximal to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1978, 60:221.
20.Tornetta P 3rd. Competence of the deltoid ligament in bimalleolar ankle fractures after medial malleolar fixation.J Bone Joint Surg Am,2000,82A:843-848. Golterman A F L. Diagnosis and treatment of tibiofibular diastasis.Arch Chir Neerl,1964,16:185.
21.Lauge-Hansen N. Fractures of the ankle. Combined experimental-surgical and experimental-roentgeno-logic investigation.Arch Surg,1950,60:957
